English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48079715      Online Users : 897
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34511


    Title: 我國中央層級分立政府成因之初探研究
    Authors: 王宏忠
    Hongu -chung, Wang
    Contributors: 吳重禮
    王宏忠
    Hongu -chung, Wang
    Keywords: 分立政府
    分裂投票
    投票穩定度
    分權制衡
    政黨認同
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 15:42:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國中央層級分立政府成因之初探研究
    摘 要
    邇來,行政部門與立法部門分屬不同政黨所掌控的「分立政府」(divided government)似乎逐漸成為台灣地區縣市政府的常態。我國自2000年總統大選過後,中央層級政府亦首度呈現分立政府型態。鑑於分立政府之意涵及其對我國實際政治運作具有相當的重要性,本論文嘗試探討造成我國中央層級分立政府的成因。分立政府的形成主要源自選民的「分裂投票行為」(split-ticket voting),儘管諸多研究者試圖運用各種學說,加以解釋選民為何採取分裂投票行為,但迄今仍莫衷一是,無法對其成因提供周延的解釋。本論文嘗試回顧相關文獻著作,綜合各家觀點,為其整理出研究脈絡,以作為探討我國中央層級分立政府之基礎。本論文嘗試藉由「2001年台灣選舉與民主化調查研究:民國九十年立法委員選舉全國大型民意調查研究」所釋出的資料,針對選民「分立政府」心理認知與投票行為進行分析。在影響因素方面,本文認為選民的制衡觀念、多重政黨認同、投票習性,以及憲政制度的規範等因素,可能是形成我國中央層級分立政府的重要變數。

    關鍵詞:分立政府、分裂投票、投票穩定度、分權制衡、政黨認同
    Reference: 參考文獻
    王甫昌,1993,〈光復後台灣漢人族群通婚的原因與型式初探〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,第七十六期,頁43-96。
    王甫昌,1994,〈族群同化與動員-台灣民眾政黨支持之分析〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》,第七十七期,頁1-31。
    王國璋,1993,《當代美國政治論衡》。台北:三民書局。
    吳怡銘,2000,〈台北市選民分裂投票之研究—民國八十七年市長與市議員選舉之分析〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    吳重禮,1998,〈美國「分立性政府」與「一致性政府」體制運作之比較與評析〉,《政治科學論叢》,第九期,頁61-90。
    吳重禮,2000,〈美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析:兼論台灣地區政治發展〉,《問題與研究》,第三十九卷,第三期,頁75-101。
    吳重禮、陳慧玟譯,David R. Mayhew原著,2001,《分立政府:1946~1990年間之政黨控制、立法與調查》。台北:五南書局。
    吳重禮、林長志,2001,〈我國2000年總統大選後中央層級「分立政府」的爭議:核四議題與府會互動的評析〉,2001年台灣政治學會年會暨「政黨輪替後之台灣政治」學術研討會,12月16日。
    吳重禮、湯京平、黃紀,〈我國「政治功效意識」測量之初探〉,《選舉研究》,第六卷,第二期,頁23-44。
    吳重禮、楊樹源,〈台灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」與「一致政府」之比較:以新竹縣市與嘉義縣市為例〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第十三卷,第三期,頁251-304。
    林瓊珠,2001,〈台灣民眾政治知識之探析〉,2001年台灣政治學會年會暨「政黨輪替後之台灣政治」學術研討會,12月16日。
    胡佛,1998,《政治學的科學研究(三):政治參與與選舉行為》,台北:三民書局。
    洪永泰,1995,〈分裂投票:八十三年台北市選舉的實證分析〉,《選舉研究》,第二卷,第一期,頁119-45。
    洪永泰、陳義彥、黃德福,1995,〈臺北市民眾市政意向之研究〉,台北市政府研考會委託政大選研中心執行。
    施奕任,2001,〈1998年高雄市市長與市議員選舉中選民「分裂投票」行為〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    徐火炎,1993,〈選民的政黨政治價值取向、政黨認同與黨派投票抉擇:第二屆國大代表選舉選民的投票行為分析〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第三卷,第二期,頁144-66。
    徐火炎,1995,〈「李登輝情結」與省市長選舉的投票行為:一項政治心理學的分析〉,《選舉研究》,第二卷,第二期,頁1-36。
    徐火炎,1998,〈李登輝情結的政治心理與選民的投票行為〉,《選舉研究》,第五卷,第二期,頁35-71。
    翁秀琪、孫秀蕙,1994,〈選民的媒介使用行為及其政治知識、政黨偏好與投票型之間的關聯-兼論台灣媒體壟斷對政治認知與行為之影響〉,《選舉研究》,第一卷,第二期,頁1-25。
    陳若蘭,2001,〈台北市選民投票變遷之研究--民國八十三年與八十七年台北市長選舉之分析〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    陳陸輝、游清鑫,2001,〈民眾眼中的分立政府:政黨的府會互動與首長施政滿意度〉,《理論與政策》,第十五卷,第三期,頁61-78。
    許勝懋,2000,〈台北市選民的分裂投票行為:一九九八年市長選舉之分析〉,國立政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    許增如,1996,〈美國選民分裂投票行為之研究:以一九九二年選舉為例〉,國立政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    許增如,1999,〈一九九六年美國大選中的分裂投票行為:兩個議題模式的探討〉,《歐美研究》,第二十九卷,第一期,頁83-126。
    黃秀端,1995,〈一九九四年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析〉,《選舉研究》,第二卷,第一期,頁51-76。
    黃秀端,1996,〈政治知識之認知與性別差異〉,《東吳政治學報》,第五期,頁27-50。
    黃紀,2000,〈質變數之計量分析〉,載謝復生、盛杏湲主編《政治學的範圍與方法》,頁387-411。台北:五南書局。
    黃紀,2001,〈一致與分裂投票:方法論之探討〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第十三卷,第五期,頁541-74。
    黃紀、吳重禮,2000,〈台灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」影響之初探〉,《台灣政治學刊》,第四期,頁106-147。
    黃德福,1991,〈臺灣地區七十八年底選舉分裂投票之初探研究-以臺北縣、雲林縣與高雄縣為個案〉,《政治學報》,第十九卷,頁55-80。
    彭睿仁,2001,〈中央與地方層級選舉間投票穩定程度之研究--1999年雲林縣長補選與2000年總統選舉雲林縣選舉結果的比較分析〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    張益超,1999,〈選民投票穩定度之研究-嘉義市第四屆與第五屆市長選舉之分析〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    楊樹源,2001,〈台灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」與「一致政府」之比較:以新竹縣市與嘉義縣市為例〉,國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
    Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan politics, and Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Atwood, Erwin L., and Keith R. Sanders. 1975. “Perception of Information Sources and Split Ticket Voting.” Journalism Quarterly 52: 421-428.
    Alvarez, R. Michael, and Matthew M. Schousen. 1993. “Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations-Testing the International Models of Split-Ticket Voting.” American Politics Quarterly 21(4): 410-438.
    Balch, George I. 1974. “ Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept’ Sense of Political Efficacy’.” Political Methodology 1: 1-43.
    Beck, Paul Allen, Lawrence Baum, Aage R. Clausen, and Charles E. Smith. 1992. “Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 86(4): 916-928.
    Born, Richard. 1994. “Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina’s Policy-Balancing Model.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(1): 95-115.
    Brady, David W. 1993. “The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics?” American Political Science Review 87(1): 189-194.
    Burden, C. Barry, and David C. Kimball. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 533-544.
    Campbell, Angus, Gerald Gurin, and Warren Miller. 1954. The Voter Choice. Evanston, ІL: Row, Peterson.
    Campbell, Angus, and Warren E. Miller. 1957. “ The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting.” American Political Science Review 51: 293-312.
    Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes.1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Chen, Don-yun, and Huang Tong-yi. 1999. “Divided Government: A New Approach to Taiwan’s Local Politics.” Issues & Studies 35(1): 1-35.
    Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. “Divided Control of Fiscal Policy.” In The Politics of Divided Government, ed. Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp.155-175.
    Cox, Gary W., and Samuel Kernell. 1991. “Introduction: Governing a Divided Era.” In The Politics of Divided Government, ed. Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp.1-10.
    Craig, Stephen C. 1979. “Efficacy, Trust, and Political Behavior: An Attempt to Resolve a Lingering Conceptual Dilemma.” American Political Quarterly 7: 225-239.
    Cutler, Lloyd N. 1980. “To Form a Government: On the Defects of Separation of Power.” Foreign Affairs 59(1): 126-143.
    Cutler, Lloyd N. 1988. “Some Reflections about Divided Government.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 18(3): 489-490.
    Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter.1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    DeVries, Walter, and Lance Tarrance. 1972. The Ticket-Splitter: A New Force in American Politics. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
    Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economics Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
    Edwards, George C., III, Andrew Barrett, and Jeffrey Peake. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 545-563.
    Feigert, Frank B.1979. “Illusions of Ticket-splitting.” American Politics Quarterly 7(4): 470-488.
    Fiorina, Morris P.1988. “The Reagan Years: Turning to the Right or Grouping toward the Middle?” In The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies, ed. Barry Cooper, Allan Kornberg, and William Mishler. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Pp.430-459.
    Fiorina, Morris P. 1989. Congress: Keystone of Washington Establishment. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Fiorina, Morris P. 1991. “Divided Government in the States.” In The Politics of Divided Government, ed. Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp.179-202.
    Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
    Fiorina, Morris P.1994. “Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina Policy-Balancing Model-Response.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(1): 117-125.
    Garand, James C. and Marci Glascock Lichtl. 2000. “Explaining Divided Government in the United States: Testing an International Model of Split-Ticket Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 173-191
    Ingberman, Daniel. and John Villani. 1993. “An Institutional Theory of Divided Government and Party Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 429-472.
    Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Jacobson, Gary C. 1991. “Explaining Divided Government: Why can’t Republicans Win the House.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(4): 640-643.
    Jennings, M. Kent., and Richard G. Niemi. 1981. Generation and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Jones, Charles O. 1994. Presidency in a Separated System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Key, V. O., Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17: 3-18.
    Key, V. O., Jr. 1959. “Secular Realignment and the Party System.” Journal of Politics 21:198-210.
    Krehbiel, Keith. 1996. “Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock: A Theory of Divided and Unified Government.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 8(1): 7-40.
    Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Democracy, Presidential or Parliamentary: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 3-87.
    Litt, Edgar. 1970. Beyond Pluralism: Ethnic Politics in America. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
    Mayhew, David R. 1991a. “Divided Party Control: Does It Make a Difference?” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(4): 637-640.
    Mayhew, David R. 1991b. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    McAllister, Ian, and Robert Darcy. 1992. “Sources of Split-Ticket Voting in the American Elections.” Political Studies 40(4): 695-712.
    McCubbins, Mathew D. 1991. “Government on Lay-Away: Federal Spending and Deficits under Divided Party Control.” In The Politics of Divided Government, ed. Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp.113-153.
    Menefee-Libey, David. 1991. “Divided Government as Scapegoat.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(4): 643-646
    Milbrath, Lester, and M.L. Goel. 1977. Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Miller, Warren E.1992. “Generational Changes and Party Identification.” Political Behavior 14: 335-352.
    Nie, Norman H, Sidney Verba, and John P. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Sigelman, Lee, Paul J. Wahlbeck, and Emmett H. Buell, Jr. 1997. “Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 879-894.
    Soss, Joe, and David T. Canon. 1993. “Partisan Division and Voting Decisions: U.S. Senator, Governors, and the Rise of a Divided Federal Government.” Political Research Quarterly 48(2): 253-274.
    Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of Party System. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    Sundquist, James L. 1986. Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    Sundquist, James L. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103(4): 613-635.
    Thurber, James A. 1991. Divided Democracy: Cooperation and Conflict between the President and Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
    Thurber, James A. 1991. “Representation, Accountability, and Efficiency in Divided Party Control of Government.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24(4): 653-657.
    Wattenberg, Martin P. 1990. The Decline of American Political Parties. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991.The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wolfinger, Raymond E.1965. “The Development and Persistence of Ethnic Voting.” American Political Science Review 59: 896-908.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    89252014
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0892520144
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52014401.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2781View/Open
    52014402.pdf18KbAdobe PDF2780View/Open
    52014403.pdf17KbAdobe PDF2918View/Open
    52014404.pdf20KbAdobe PDF2761View/Open
    52014405.pdf36KbAdobe PDF21054View/Open
    52014406.pdf57KbAdobe PDF21202View/Open
    52014407.pdf56KbAdobe PDF2924View/Open
    52014408.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2861View/Open
    52014409.pdf37KbAdobe PDF2929View/Open
    52014410.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2753View/Open
    52014411.pdf35KbAdobe PDF2996View/Open
    52014412.pdf23KbAdobe PDF2844View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback