Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35361
|
| Title: | 技術商品化組織內機制探討 |
| Authors: | 楊慶昌
Yang,Chiang-Chang |
| Contributors: | 溫肇東
楊慶昌
Yang,Chiang-Chang |
| Keywords: | 技術商品化
商品化模式
智慧資本管理 |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 14:49:48 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 『要如何將科技研發技術商品化』是國際間運用科技成果帶動經濟發展最重要的議題，本研究目的即在透過文獻探討及個案研究從對下列三議題的研究：
一、『研發技術商品化』的推動行之有年，然而，聯結『技術價值』與『經濟價值』間的環節為何？
二、智慧資本管理如何有效協助『研發技術商品化』？
三、透過個案研究實証，值得借鏡的做法為何？
探討技術成果商品化的機制。
從文獻的探討，本研究獲得許多學者專家曾提出精闢的看法，並從這些看法中歸納出對『技術商品化組織內機制』的評論與建議，後續並透過對British Technology Group(BTG)的案例研究，驗證實施的可行性。
本研究重要結論如下：
一、利用科技成果帶動經濟發展，近年來成為先進國家重要經濟發展策，『研發技術商品化』仍然有很大的調整空間。
二、技術商品化是一連串複雜的加值過程，透過商品化模式可將技術價值與經濟價值聯結聯結。
三、智慧資本為企業帶來價值，同時為達成技術商品化模式提供競爭策略決策分析。
四、目前大學與研究機構在流程上缺乏以『商品化模式』聯結『技術價值』與『經濟價值』。從文獻回顧，大學與研究機構除擁有技術和專利外，已逐步開始建立社群網脈，從經營觀點來看，專業人力仍是最大的弱點。
關鍵辭：技術商品化、商品化模式、智慧資本管理
In order to have a competitive economic growth, “how to turn the value from R&D technology to knowledge-based economy” becomes one of the most important issue of multi-nations. Hence, the purpose of this study is to explore the mechanism of how to commercialize the R&D technologies.
There are three following topics will be studied by the methods of articles review and case study to explore the mechanism :
1.What is the gap from transferring the technology value to economic value?
2.How intellectual capital management help technology commercialization?
3.What we learned from the benchmark case after studied?
Many profound articles of technology commercialization from those named scholars has been reviewed and summarized into this study as references. The British Technology Group (BTG) was choused as the benchmark of feasibility case, based on its pioneered and experienced performance.
The conclusions of this study are:
1.There are still have many space available for increasing competitive economic value by building up the mechanism of commercialization of R&D technology.
2.”Technology commercialization” is a series of complex value-added process. “Business Model” plays the bridging role linking the “technology value” and “economic value” during the processing.
3.”Intellectual capital management system” provide strategic analysis for competitive business model decision on technology commercialization process.
4.Currently, business model still not play the bridging role between technology value and economic value for most University and R&D institute during the technology commercialization processing. However, from the articles review, some universities and R&D institutes are starting to build up the technology commercialization network will be good for the business promotion, and the most week point for those organization still lock on the shortage of experienced manpower.
Key Word: Technology Commercialization, Business Model, Intellectual Capital Management |
| Reference: | 一、中文部份
1.國科會(1990,1997,2004年版)，中華民國科學技術統計要覽。
2.任曙(2003)，『旅行業核心資源與經營策略之研究』，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系，台中。
3.陳佩佩(2001)，影響新事業技術商品化與績效相關因素之研究--以高科技產業為例。
4.陳怡之(1996)，我國廠商技術移轉需求與特性分析。
5.陳怡之、郭明宗(1999)，智慧財產權之衍生研究技術商品化問題之研究，智慧產權，182-192頁。
6.馮震宇撰(1995)，技術移轉之類型及其比較，工業財產權與標準，106頁。
7.黃俊英、劉江彬(1999)，智慧財產權的法律與管理二版，華泰事業。
8.劉江彬(1995)，『美國大學及研究機構技術移轉之模式與成效』，跨世紀產業發展中之智慧財產權研討會論文集，經濟部，134-151頁。
9.劉江彬、孫遠釗(1998)，『美國大學及研究機構專利運用績效之表達』，工研院。
10.行政院國家科學委員會簡報(20048.31)，”民間與政府投入研發經費之探討”。
二、英文部份
1. Allen, M.,( 2001),”A Review of Best Practices in University Technology Licensing Offices”,The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, Vol.XIII,pp.57-69,
2.Andonian,J,k., (1991),”New Method to Determine Royalty Rates”,Les Nouvelles ,pp.58-60,
3.Applegate,L.M.;Austin,R.D.& McFarlan,F.W., (2003),”Corporate information strategy & management”(6th ed),New York, McGraw Hill-Irwin..
4.AUTM (2001,2002,2003,2004),AUTM Licensing Survey,
5.Baclawski,J.E., (1997),”How University Research Benefits the USA”, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 11,No.4, pp. 255-257
6.Bary,M.J.;Lee,J.N.(2000), “University Revenues from Technology Transfer:Licensing Feesvs. Equity Position”, Journal of Business Venture, Vol.15, Sep., pp.385-392
7.Bidault,F., (1989),Technology Pricing-From Principal to Strategy, Translated by Page,Brian and Sherwood, Peter,St. Martins Press, New York.
8.Bontis,N., (1999),”Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field”, International Journal of Technology Management,Vol.18, No.5/6/7/8, ,pp.433-462
9.Branson, L., (1966), “Transfer of International Knowledge by International Corporation to Developing Countries”, American Economic Review, Paper and Proceeding S. Vol.56, May., pp.259-267,
10.Brody, H., (2001), “The TR University Research Scorecard”,
Http//:www.technologyoverview.com/magazine/sep01
11.Booth, R.., (1998),”The measurement of intellectual capital”, Management Accounting, Vol.76, No. 10, Nov. pp.26-28
12.Brooking, A., (1996), Intellectual Capital, London: International Thomason Business Press,
9.BTG,(1998,1999.2000.2001.2002,2003,2004),Annual Report,
10.BTG ,(1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004),Interim Report,
11.BTG,(1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004),Prelimary Results,
12.Chesbrough, H.;Rosenbloom,R.S.,( 2002),”The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation:evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies”,Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.11,No.3, pp.529-555
13.Churchwell, T.L.,(1999)”The ARCH Development Corporation Process for Commercialization of Technology from Research Institution” Industry of Higher Education,Vol. 13,No.6, pp412-415
14. Contractor, F. J., (1981),”The Role Licensing International strategy”, Columbia Journal of World Business, pp.73-83
15.Cooper, R.G. and More, R.A., (1979), “Modular risk. management: an applied example.”, R&D Management, Vol.9, No.2, pp.93–100.
16.Davies, H., (1977), “Technology Transfer through Commercial Transfer Transaction”, J. of Industrial Economics, December.
17.Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual
capital: An introduction. Management Accounting (February): pp.32-36.
18.Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M., (1997),” Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower”, New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.,.
19.Goldsmith, R., (1999),Technology Commercialization Model.
20.Grummer.L., (1998),”Strategic Consideration in the Commercialization of Technology”,Circuits & Device, pp55-56.
21.Harrison,S.;Sullivan,P., (2000),”Profiting from Intellectual Capital-Learning from leading companies”,J. of Intellectual Capital,Vol.1, No.1,pp.33-46
22.Harvey,I., (2003),”Taking IP to market the BTG way”,Intellectual Asset Management,Nov./Dec.,pp.16-22.
23. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/technology
24.Jenkins S, Forbes S, Durrani TS & Banerjee SK., (1997), “Managing the product. development process”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.13, No.4, pp.359-378.
25. Jolly, V. K., (1997),”Commercializing New Technology”,Harvard Business School Press
26.Karlsson, M., (2004).”Commercialization of Research Results in The United States-An Overview of Federal and Academia Technology Transfer”, A Report Commissioned by the Swedish Ministry of Education and Science, U2001/467/F, Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies,ITPS, Embassy of Sweden,Washington D.C.
27.Kolter, P., (1984), Marketing E., Chapter 10, Prentic-Hall, Inc.
28.Magretta,J., (2002),”Why Business Model Matter”,Harvard Business Review, R0205F,May.
29.Mansfield, E., (1983),” International Technology Transfer: forms,resource requirements and policies”, Technological Transfer, Vol. 65, No.2 pp.372-377
30.Martino, J.P., (1996),” The Role of University Research Institutes in Technology Transfer”, Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 10,No.5, pp.316-320
31.Morgan, R.P.;Strickland,D.E., (2001),”US University Research Contributions to Industry: Findings and Conjectures”,Science and Public Policy,Vol.28,No.2, pp. 113-121.
32.Nelsen,L.,( 2000),”Strategyand Tactics for Technology Licensing”, Taiwan Licensing Seminar, Taiwan, Jan.
33.OECD(2004),Main Science and Technology Indicators
34.Porter M.,( 2001), Harvard Business Review, March,pp.63-68
35. R&D Funding Forcast(2004),R&D Magazine, pp.F1,January
36.Rappert, B., (1997), “University Spin-Offs in the Commercialization of Research”, Industry and Higher Education
37.Seddon,P.B.;Lewis,G.P. (2003),”Strategy and Business Models: What’s the Difference?”,7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information System,, Adelaide, South Australia,pp.236-248
38.Schein J., (2004), “The Role of the Business Model and Strategy for Business”,http://www.articlesfactory.com
39.Steward, T.A., (1994),”Your company’s most valuable asset: Intellectual capital: Fortune, Oct., pp.68-74
40.Teece,D., (1977),”Technology Transfer by Multinational Firm: the resource cost of transferring technology know-how”, The Economic Journal, Vol.87, pp.242-261..
41.Teece, D., (1986),”Profiting from Technology Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol.15, No.6,pp.285-305
42.Weill, P. & Vitale,M.R.,(2001),”Place to Space-Migrating to eBusiness Models”,Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation,USA. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
90932921
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090932921 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
