| Abstract: | 國內過往對於古蹟的保存手法，造成古蹟去生命化的後果，原因除了其忽視再利用面向之經營規劃外，純粹性的觀光政策也簡化了古蹟的社會文化功能。故 「再利用」一詞，於近幾年問被各界提出與熱烈討論，試圖去轉變「古蹟」的消極功能。但事實上，現今國內古蹟保存政策法令，在支援「再利用」此概念時，仍有不足之處。《文化資產保存法》自民國七十一年公佈施行以來，歷經四次之增訂修正，對古蹟保存之發展提供改善的空間。然而對於再利用工作，始終未能有突破性的規範，導致古蹟保存工作就在體制不全的情況下，未能積極發揮其角色所蘊含的意義。緣此，本研究旨在分析自四○年代以來，國內古蹟保存政策之歷程，隨著社經環境的變遷，瞭解現階段古蹟保存政策法令與經營管理上之不足，並擬議古蹟保存再利用之整體配套策略，提供當前古蹟保存政策之參考。
首先，本研究藉由整理分析文獻資料與論述古蹟再利用之意義，進而依據時間序列，探討各階段之古蹟保存政策重點；並分別就行政、立法與社會結構面向，說明古蹟保存的當前困境。此外，藉由問卷調查方式，以釐清再利用機制應參酌的相關面向；並輔以個案調查訪談，以瞭解現行古蹟保存再利用工作之執行情形，作為研訂古蹟保存再利用策略之參考。最後，規劃古蹟保存再利用策略機制，確認古蹟保存再利用之目標，並建立再利用階段性策略，以對國內古蹟保存困境提出改善之道。
本研究結果在現況課題解決方面，建議釐清再利用之定義、建立行政資源統籌部會與修正私有古蹟委託管理相關條文規定；在問卷調查與個案研究方面，發現私有古蹟衝突有待化解、保存誘因不足、欠缺公開透明的再利用經營管理審查機制與經營管理方式欠缺監督與彈性化之問題；另於再利用機制之配套法令方面，建議應提高再利用計畫之執行位階、釐清再利用、修復工程計畫與經營管理工作三者間的關係，並且規範管理再利用收益事項。本研究參酌問卷調查結果，研擬再利用策略之執行機制，在參與主體對象上，建議古蹟所有權人、政府機關與非營利組織之投入；在推動方式方面，建議以社區總體營造、公私合作與商圈再造方式進行；於再利用階段性策略上，共分為三階段：前置基礎階段建議進行古蹟調查研究，以建立完整的歷史資料庫；第二階段強調再利用計畫與修復工程建設的平行協調；第三階段進行古蹟經營管理維護計畫，建構古蹟經營管理機制。期以上述之建議與策略機制，對國內古蹟保存工作有所助益。
關鍵字：古蹟保存政策、再利用、古蹟經營管理、文化資產保存法
As for the historical preservation in Taiwan, we overlook the fact that preservation is to "reuse" a historical monument by management and planning, and the tourism policy only focused on "one dimension@Tourism", which simplified the social and cultural functions of historical monuments. As a result, we fail to revitalize our historical monuments. The catchphrase "reuse", in an attempt to transform the passive function of historical monuments, has been the center of attention among communities in recent years. However, the laws regulating the protection of historical monuments are not fully supportive to the concept of "reuse". "Cultural Assets Protection Law" enacted in 1982, had undergone four revisions due to the need to improve the development of historical preservation. Even so, we hardly see any breakthrough of the laws for the works of "reuse". The current legal system fails to take an active role in terms of historical preservation. Concerning this, the thesis aims to analyze the development of historical preservation policies since 1951. With the changes of social and economic environments, we need to understand the insufficient respects of policies or regulations in terms of management in the current stage, and propose a set of compatible strategies as a reference to the policies of historical preservation.
At the first stage, the thesis is to compile and analyze existing documents looking for the significance of reusing historical monuments. Furthermore, in a chronological order, it studies the measures and policies of historical preservation in different stages in order to draw a picture of the difficulties that have been encountered in administrative, legislative and, social structural levels. In addition, the supplement of questionnaires is to clarify different perspectives that should be considered in terms of "reuse". Also, this study provides with individual interviews of the execution of "reuse" mechanism, to further understand the current situation and to offer reference to the policy makers. In the end, the thesis offers a framework to achieve the "reuse" mechanism and to confirm the goals of both preservation and reuse. With the establishment of reuse policies in different stages, the thesis offers a solution to improve the current difficult situations.
As to the solution of existing problems, the thesis suggests that we clarify the definition of "reuse", establish a department for the administrative management, and revise the articles as well as clauses regarding private historical monuments. From the questionnaires and case studies, we find problems like the conflicts of private historical monuments, the lack of incentive for preservation, the absence of a transparent mechanism for examining reuse management, the absence of the inflexibility and the supervision over the management. As to the laws related to reuse mechanism, we suggest to raise the priority of implementing reuse projects, clarify the relationship among reuse, monument-repair projects, and administrative works, as well as regulate and manage the profits from reuse projects. Based on the result of the questionnaires to frame the implementation mechanism of the reuse strategies, we suggest participation of reuse by the owner, government and the NPOs, and community empowerment, public-private partnership and commercial region reconstruction to set into action. There are three stages on reuse strategies. First, we recommend monuments investigation and studies to establish the complete database; second, strengthening the parallel relationship of reuse projects and monument-repair projects; third, executing monument management project and construct its mechanism Based on above strategies, we believe historical preservation would benefit.
Keywords : Historical Preservation Policy Reuse Historical Monument Management Cultural Assets Protection Law |
