Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36410
|
| Title: | 同儕評量與自評之差異、相對親疏關係決策控制力及內外控對團體成員公平知覺的影響 |
| Authors: | 徐瑋伶
Hsu, Wei-Ling |
| Contributors: | 陳彰儀
Chen, Chang-I
徐瑋伶
Hsu, Wei-Ling |
| Keywords: | 同儕評量與自評之差異
相對親疏關係
決策控制力
內外控
公平知覺
Discrepancies between peer rating and self rating
Relative relationship
Decision control
Locus of control
Perception of fairness |
| Date: | 1998 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 18:30:30 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究之目的在了解使用同儕評量為考核方式時，可能影響團體成員公平知覺等心理反應的因素。研究中以96名大學女生為實驗對象，採2x2x2實驗設計，探討“同儕評量與自評之差異”、“團體成員相對親疏關係”及“決策控制力（自評對獎金分配之影響力）”等三個因素對團體成員公平知覺之影響，並了解內外控傾向在此影響機制中扮演的角色。研究結果顯示，當團體使用同儕評量之考核方法時，“同儕評量與自評之差異”對個體的公平知覺、結果滿意、團體吸引力、再次合作意願均有非常顯著的影響。顯示個體相當關心自我評量與同儕評量之差異，當同儕評量比自評低時，個人在以上幾種心理反應都顯著的較弱。在“相對親疏關係”上，結果顯示個體進入團體中時，若感覺其他兩位成員間之親疏關係，比個體自己與其他任一人間為親密時，其公平知覺會較低。在“決策控制力”上，則發現其對公平知覺與再次合作意願有顯著影響，當自評對酬賞結果具有影響力（決策控制力高）時，個體的公平知覺會較高，也較願意再次與其他兩位成員合作。在“同儕評量與自評之差異”、“相對親疏關係”、“決策控制力”三者之交互作用方面，分析結果顯示均未達顯著。在內外控此變項上，除發現其對公平知覺有顯著影響，即愈外控者之公平知覺愈低外，另亦顯示內外控與“相對親疏關係”具有交互作用，但與“決策控制力”、“同儕評量與自評之差異”之交互作用並不顯著，表示內外控只在“相對親疏關係”對公平知覺之影響上有調節效果。本研究最後對未獲驗證之部份加以討論，並依實驗所得結果，提出可能之貢獻、限制、對未來研究的建議及工商實務上之應用。
This study, employing 96 undergraduates and 2×2×2 experimental design, examined the effects of “discrepancies between peer rating and self rating”, “ relative relationship” and “decision control (the influence of self rating on reward) ” to group members’ perception of fairness. The role of locus of control was also explored. When using the peer rating, subjects who received relative lower peer rating showed weaker perception of fairness, less satisfied with outcome, less attracted to other two coworkers and lower recooperative willing. Subjects perceived fairer when the relative relationship is equal (the familiarity within group members is the same). With the high decision control, subjects’ perception of fairness and recooperative willing were higher. No interaction effect of these three independent variables was found. Locus of control had moderating effect on the relation between relative relationship and perception of fairness. Implications for management and future research are discussed. |
| Reference: | 李美枝（民82）。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人人己關係的界限。
本土心理學研究，第1期，頁267﹣300。
李俊明（民87）。以同儕提名法在團體活動中評鑑初、中階主管人員之
應用分析研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
吳子輝（民64）。內外控取向與自由選擇對閱讀測驗成績之影響。國立
政治大學教育所碩士論文。
邱月淑（民81）。領導權的獲得程序及個人利得立場對程序公正知覺和
權威信服度的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
黃光國（民77）。人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。見楊國樞主編：中
國人的心理，頁289﹣318。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
曾光佩（民82）。大學生的憂鬱與歸因：憂鬱性歸因理論之驗證。國立
In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace, (pp.107-
131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Korsgaard, M.A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in
performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-
instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions.
Journal of Management, Vol 21(4), 657-669.
Lerner, M.J.（1981）. The justice motive in human relations:
Some thoughts on what we know and need to know about
justice. In M.J. Lerner (Eds), The Justice Motive in
Social Behavior (pp.23-51). New York: Academic Press.
台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文。
Leung, K., & Bond, M.H.（1984）. The impact of cultural
collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality
and Social psychology, 47, 793-804.
Lind, E.A. (1982). The Psychology of the courtroom procedure.
In N.L. Kerr & R.M. Bary (Eds), The psychology of
courtroom (pp.13-37) New York : Academic Press.
Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The Social Psychology of
Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Lind, E.A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P.C.(1993). Voice, control,
and Procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental
楊幼蘭 譯（民85）。改造企業。Michale Hammer & James Campy 原著。
concerns in fairness judgement. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
Lind, E.A., Kray, L. ＆ Thompson, L.（1998）. The social
construction of injustice :Judgement in response to own
and other`s unfair treatment by authorities.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 75, 1
-22.
Mahler, I., Greenberg, L., & Hayashi, H.（1981）. A comparative
study of rules of justice: Japanese versus American.
Psychological: An International Journal of Psychology in
台北：牛頓出版股份有限公司。
the Orient, 24(1), 1-8.
Motta, R.W., & Tiegerman, S.（1979）. Perception of justice: An
adolescent view. Journal of Community Psychology, 7(2),
151-157.
Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N.(1995). Understanding
Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-
based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murphy, K.R., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis: A
Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern
Hypothesis Tests. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associts.
齊若蘭 譯（民84）。第五項修煉﹣實踐篇(I)(II)。Peter M.Senge等
Parker, G.M. (1990). Team Player and Teamwork: The New
Competitive Business Strategy. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-
Bass Publishers.
Ployhart, r.e., & Marie Ryan, A. (1998). Applicants’ reactions
to the fairness of selection procedures: The effect of
positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 3-16.
Reberon, L., Torkel, S., Korsgarrd, A., Klein, D., Diddams, M.,
& Cayer, M. (1993). Self appraisal and perception of the
appraisal discussion: A field experiment. Journal of
著。台北：牛頓出版股份有限公司。
Organizational Behavior, 14, 129-142.
Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in Performance
evaluation : The role of instrumental and noninstrumental
voice in performance appraisal discussion. Journal of
Management, 21, 657-699.
Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal
versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological
Monographs, 80 (1,Whole no.609).
Schmitt, N., Goging, R.Z., Noe, R.A. & Kirsch, M.(1984). Meta-
analysis of validity studies published between 1964 and
Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedure and
1982 and the investigation of study characteristic.
Personnel Psychology, 37, 407-422.
Shore, L.M., & Thornton, G.C.III（1986）. Effect of gender on
self and supervisory rating. Academy of Management
Journal, 29, 111-129.
Sweeney, P.D., McFarlin, D.B., & Cotton, J.L.（1991）. Locus of
control as a moderator of the relationship between
perceived influence and procedural justice. Human
Relations, 44(4), 333-342.
Tajifel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. New
distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social
York: Cambridge University Press.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L.（1975）. Procedural Justice : A
Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive:
Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal
Of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850-863.
Tyler, T.R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in
defendant’s evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law
and Society Review, 19,51-74.
Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E.（1978）. Equity:
Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wellims, R.S., Byham, W.C., & Williams, G.R. (1994). Inside
Teams: How 20 World-class Organizations are Winning through
Teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Austin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effect of type of
relationship and task performance on choice of
distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 6(3), 402-408.
Barclay, J.H., & Harland, L.k. (1995). Peer performance
appraisal: The impact of rater competence, rater location,
and rating correctability on fairness perception. Group and
Organizational Management, 20(1), 39-60.
Basset, G.A., & Meyer, H.H.(1968). Performance appraisal based
on self review. Personnel Psychology, 21, 421-430.
Bernardin, W.C., & Beatty, R.W.（1984）. Performance Appraisal:
Assessing Human Behavior at Work. Boston: Kent.
Blakely, G.L. (1993). The effect of performance rating
discrepancies on supervisors and subordinates.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 54,57-
80.
Borman, W.C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations:
An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 12, 105-124.
Brewer, M.B. & Kramer, R.M. (1986). Choice behavior in social
dilemmas: Effect of social identity, group size, and
decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 50, 543-549.
Cardy, R.J., & Dobbins, G.H.（1994）. Performance Appraisal:
Alternative Perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western
Publishing.
Campell, D.J., & Lee, C.(1988). Self-appraisal in performance
evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of
Management Review, 13, 302-314.
Cascio, W.F. (1997). Applied Psychology in Human Resource
Management (5th). Upper Saddle River,NJ: Prentice-Hall,
Inc.
Casper, J., & Tyler, T.R.(1986). Procedural justice among felony
defendants. Paper presented at the meeting of the Law and
Society Association, Chicago.
Cawley, B.D., Keeping, L.M., & Levy, P.E.（1998）.
Participation in the performance appraisal process and
employee reaction: A meta-analysis review of field
investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615-
633.
Conlon, D.E. (1993). Some test of the self-interest and group-
value models of procedural justice: Evidence from an
organizational appeal procedure. Academy of Management
Journal, 36, 1109-1124.
Dulebohn, J.H.(1997). Social influence in justice evaluations
of human resource system. Personnel and Human Resources
Management, 5, 241-291.
Edward, M.R., & Ewen, A.J. (1996). 360-degree Feedback: The
Powerful New Model for Employee Assessment & Performance
Improvement. CA: American Management Association.
Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the Preconditions of
resentment: A referent cognition model .In J.C. Master &
W.P. Smith (Eds),Social Comparison, Relative Deprivation,
and Social Justice. New York: Pleum Press.
Folger, R., Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process
metaphor for performance appraisal. In B. Staw & L. Cumming
(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (14,127-148).
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Folger, R., & Lewis, D. (1993). Self appraisal and fairness in
evaluation. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the
Workplace, (pp.107-131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of
performance evaluation. Journal of Applied psychology,
71, 310-342.
Harris, M.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A Meta-analysis of self-
supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor rating.
Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-46.
Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E. (1978). Methods of peer assessment.
Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586.
Kanter, R.M. (1989). When Giants Learn to Dance : Mastering the
Challenge of Strategy,Management, and Careers in the
1990s. New York:Simon and Schuster.
Kirkman, B.L. Shapiro, D.L., Novelli, L. & BeReet, J.M. (1996).
Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: A
multidimensional justice perspective. Social Justice
Research, 9(1), 47-67.
Kleiman, L.S. (1997). Human Resource Management: A Tool for
Competitive Advantage. St.Paul,Minn:West Pub. Co..
Konovsky, M.A., & Brockner, J. (1993). Managing victim and
survivorlayoff reactions: A procedural justice perspective. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
86752010
87 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001297 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [Department of Psychology] Theses
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 304 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
