English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48383899      Online Users : 672
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37065


    Title: 顧客基礎網路品牌權益構面之再思
    Rethinking of customer-based on-line brand equity
    Authors: 李嘉玲
    Lee, Chia Ling
    Contributors: 錢玉芬
    Chien, Yu Fen
    李嘉玲
    Lee, Chia Ling
    Keywords: 品牌
    網路品牌權益
    顧客基礎
    使用與滿足
    Brand
    Online brand equity
    Customer-based
    Uses and gratification
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 11:53:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 網際網路普及背後孕育著龐大商機,但電子商務仍然面臨商業競爭與來自消費者的挑戰。研究者認為引進品牌權益的概念,協助電子商務經營者建立強勢網路品牌,是一可行辦法。回顧文獻,發現過去顧客基礎品牌權益研究多半為行銷者導向,較少重視消費者個別差異。為了更進一步區分消費者的差異,研究者欲藉由使用與滿足理論對媒體使用動機的研究成果,來瞭解消費者在不同的使用動機下其重視的網路品牌權益構面。本研究以Aaker(1996)提出的品牌權益為基礎,並使用網路消費者為研究對象,建構顧客基礎的網路品牌權益構面。也一併瞭解消費者個別差異,作為電子商務經營者在發展電子商務時的重要參考依據。
    本研究分四階段進行。第一階段為定義何謂網路品牌;第二階段透過焦點團體,發展出顧客基礎的網路品牌權益內涵;第三,透過第一、二階段的成果,進行網路品牌權益問卷編製與大樣本施測,確立顧客基礎的網路品牌權益構面。第四階段使用典型相關分析,以瞭解不同使用動機下的消費者,是否重視不同網路品牌權益概念。網路品牌權益量表透過線上調查,收集358份有效問卷。研究結果指出,網路品牌權益可分作五大構面,分別為網站管理(包含營運方式與互動關係)、品牌忠誠(包含使用偏好與使用習慣組成)、品牌聯想、自我表達及知覺品質,因素負荷量達52.77%;量表共33題,信度.905(p<0.01),效標關連效度達.512(p<0.01)。本研究亦發現在不同網路使用動機之下,消費者重視的網路品牌權益不同;在資訊蒐集與娛樂動機下,消費者重視網路品牌的網站管理與知覺品質;在人際與娛樂動機下,則重視知覺品質與自我表達。
    最後則對電子商務業者提出品牌經營參考,及未來學術發展方向。

    關鍵字:品牌、網路品牌權益、顧客基礎、使用與滿足。
    Despite the universal availability of the Internet and the immense business opportunities generated e-commerce, e-commerce itself is confronted by endless business competition and consumer mistrust. How should e-commerce managers react to these competition and challenges? This research proposes that the introduction of the brand equity concept is viable in helping e-commerce managers establish strong online brands, yet existing literature on customer-based brand equity are mostly marketer oriented rather than customer oriented, thus not much weight is given to individual consumer differences. We use mass media theory “uses and gratification” theory to understand if customer have different internet use motivation will cause them prefer different online brand equity. We use online consumer as research participant, and build customer-based online brand equity construct, describe individual differences as our results. E-commerce managers can utilize as important reference when developing their business affairs.
    This research is conducted in four stages: the first stage is intended for understanding consumers’ definition of online brands; the second stage develops preliminary customer-based online brand equity constructs via focus groups; the third stage develops customer-based brand equity constructs by designing and testing a survey based on the results of the first two stages using large samples; and the fourth stage uses canonical analysis to find out whether customer have different internet use motivation will cause them prefer different online brand equity. We collected 358 validate questionnaires. Findings indicate that online brand equity can be divided into five dimensions: web site management, brand loyalty, brand associations, self expressions, and perceived quality. Totaling 33 items, factor loading 52.77%, with 0.905 in reliability and 0.512 (p<0.01) in criteria-related validity. When conusumer’s internet use motivation is search information and entertainment, the online brand equity construct they will prefer is web site managemet and perceived quality. But when conusumer’s internet use motivation is interpersonal and entertainment, the online brand equity construct they will prefer is perceived quality and self expressions.
    According results above, we propsed some recommdations for e-commerce managers and scholars.


    Keywords: Brand, Online brand equity, Customer-based, Uses and gratification
    Reference: 中文參考文獻
    吳明隆與涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北:五南出版。
    林新慧、盧希鵬(2004)。網路經濟環境之網站品牌權益衡量模式--顧客基礎觀點。電子商務研究,2(2),161-180。
    施翠娟(2004)。知覺品質、品牌聯想對品牌權益因素之研究--以新聞網站為例。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。
    柯達(2003)。網路購物使用與滿足之研究。世新大學傳播管理學系,未出版碩士論文,台北市。
    洪偉仁(2001)。網路品牌 vs. 傳統品牌:N世代的認知差異分析。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,高雄市。
    耿慶瑞、黃思明與洪順慶(2003)。 WWW互動廣告效果。管理學報,19(1),1-39。
    張卿卿(2006)。網路的功與過:網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討。新聞學研究,86,45-90。
    陳振燧(1996)。顧客基礎的品牌權益衡量與建立之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所,未出版博士論文,台北市。
    游智雯(2000)。網路健康資訊的使用與滿足—從網路與閱聽人特性之觀點探討。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所,未出版碩士論文,嘉義縣。
    趙光正(2000)。網際網路瀏覽行為之研究。國立政治大學資訊管理學系,未出版碩士論文,台北市。
    盧希鵬(2005)。網路行銷-電子化企業經營策略。台北:雙葉書廊。
    蕭仁閩(2000)。網際網路企業品牌建立之初探性研究-- 以台灣純線上購物網站為例。國立政治大學科技管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,台北市。
    錢玉芬(2007)。傳播心理學。台北:威仕曼文化。
    錢玉芬、傅豐玲與盧恩慈 (2000年11月)。 比較電子報與傳統報紙之傳播效果─以閱聽人對新政府的態度形成為例。卓美玲(主持人),New Technologies and Information Society。淡江大學國際傳播學術研討會,淡江大學。
    羅文輝、李郁青、施盈廷與楊秀娟(2005)。網路採用、使用與獲得之滿足。新聞學研究,83,127-165。

    西文參考文獻
    Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. N.Y. : The Free Press.
    Aaker D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets, California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
    Blackston, M.(2000). Observations:Building brand equity by managing the brand’s relationships. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(6),101-106.
    Chien, Yu-fen, & Lee, Chia-ling. (2008, March). Building customer-based online brand equity. In Pimmanee Rattanawicha (Chair), e-Commerce, paper presented at the meeting of e-CASE 2008 Conference, Bangkok.
    Christodoulides, G., & Chernaton de L. (2004). Dimensionalising on- and offline brands’ composite equity. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(2/3), 168-179.
    Don, E. S. (2000).Understanding And Measuring Brand Equity. Marketing Management, 9, 1-9. 轉引自施翠娟(2004) 知覺品質、品牌聯想對品牌權益因素之研究--以新聞網站為例。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所,未出版之碩士論文,台北市。
    Eighmey, J., & McCord, L. (1998). Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the world wide web. Journal of Business Research, 41(3), 187.
    Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68.
    Kamakura, W. & Russell, G. (1993). Measuring Brand Value With Scanner Data. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 9-22.
    Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
    Keller, K. L. (2001). Building Customer-based Brand Equity. Marketing Management, 10(2), 14-20.
    Kim, J., Sharma, S., & Setaekorn, K. (2002). A Framework for Building Brand Equity Online for Pure-Play B2C Retail and Services. The International Journal on Media Management, 4(2), 123-131.
    Ko, H., Cho, Chang-Hoan, & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet Uses And Gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 57-70.
    Kotler, P. (1999). Kotler on Marketing: How to Create, Win, and Dominate Markets. N.Y.: The Free Press.
    Kynch, P. D., Kent, R. J., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2001). The Global Internet Shopper: Evidence from Shopping in Twelve Countries. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(3), 15-23.
    LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395-413.
    Liu, Yuping. & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31, 53-64.
    Morgan, P. P. (2000). A Consumer-Orientated Framework of Brand Equity and Loyalty. Journal of the Marketing Research Society, 42(1), 65-78.
    Morris, M. & Ogan, C. ( 1996 ). The Internet as Mass Medium, Journal of Communication, 46(1):39-50.
    Murphy, J. (1990). Brand Strategy. NY: Prentice-Hall.
    Netemeyer, R.G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagcid, M., Dean, D., Ricks, J., & Wirth, F. (2004). Developing and Validating Measures of Facets of Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Business Research, 57, 209– 224.
    Pauwels, K., & Dans, E. (2001). Empirical Studies Internet marketing the News: Leveraging Brand Equity from Marketplace to Marketspace. Brand Management, 8(4 & 5), 303-314.
    Quelch, J. A., & Klein, L. R. (1996). The internet and international marketing. Sloan Management review, 37, 60-75.
    Simon, C. J., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The measurement and determinants of brand equity: A financial approach. Marketing Science, 12(1), 28-53. 轉引自施翠娟(2004)。 知覺品質、品牌聯想對品牌權益因素之研究--以新聞網站為例。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所,未出版之碩士論文,台北市。
    Song, I., Larose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Lin, C. A. (2004). Internet gratifications and internet addiction: On the uses and abuses of new media. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 384-394.
    Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet. Decision Science, 35(2), 259-288.
    Washburn, J.H., & Plank, R.E. (2002). Measuring brand equity: An evaluation of a consumer-based brand equity scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(1), 46-62.
    Xueming, L. (2002). Adding value in the information age: A multidisciplinary perspective. Proceeding of American Marketing Association Conference, winter 2002, Austin, TX.

    網路資料
    何佩儒、王純瑞(2005年07月07日)。MIC:電子商店 陣亡率超過三成。UDN
    數位文化誌。2005年12月09日,取自http://mag.udn.com/mag/dc/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=3&f_SUB_ID=529&f_ART_ID=15575。
    資策會ACI-IDEA-FIND(2005年10月06日)。2005年6月底止台灣上網人口。2005年12月09日取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=118。
    資策會ACI-IDEA-FIND(2005年10月20日)。購物習性偏好及追求低價可能成為線上購物業致命傷。2005年12月15日,取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=news&id=3969。
    資策會ACI-IDEA-FIND(2005年9月15日)。美2005Q2線上零售突破200億大關 走勢上揚。2005年12月09日,取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=news&id=3914。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    93752005
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093752005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    75200501.pdf66KbAdobe PDF21174View/Open
    75200502.pdf98KbAdobe PDF21204View/Open
    75200503.pdf75KbAdobe PDF21743View/Open
    75200504.pdf91KbAdobe PDF21406View/Open
    75200505.pdf108KbAdobe PDF21307View/Open
    75200506.pdf321KbAdobe PDF25678View/Open
    75200507.pdf238KbAdobe PDF22216View/Open
    75200508.pdf369KbAdobe PDF22038View/Open
    75200509.pdf159KbAdobe PDF21712View/Open
    75200510.pdf177KbAdobe PDF21943View/Open
    75200511.pdf579KbAdobe PDF23978View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback