Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37086
|
| Title: | 雙元自主能力對訊息區辨的作用效果：範疇優勢的運作機制
The Effect of dual autonomy on message discernment: processing mechanism of domain superiority |
| Authors: | 吳志文
Wu, Chih-Wen |
| Contributors: | 葉光輝
Yeh, Kuang-Hui
吳志文
Wu, Chih-Wen |
| Keywords: | 雙元自主性模型
範疇優勢性
共存
個體化自主
關係自主
共同方法變異偏誤
訊息區辨
Dual Autonomy Model
Domain Superiority
Coexistence
Individuating Autonomy
Relating Autonomy
Common Method Variance Bias
Message Discernment |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 11:56:54 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在檢證雙元自主性模型中自主能力與情境操弄對訊息區辨表現的範疇優勢性運作機制；並為了排除過去系列相關研究結果可能受到共同方法變異偏誤所造成的效度威脅，本研究採取訊息區辨表現作為非自陳式效標變項，重新檢證雙元自主性模型的各項主張觀點。
本文共包含兩個研究，研究一經由811位台灣北部與南部的高中職三年級學生，以班級作為單位進行團體施測，測量其個體化與關係雙元自主能力，並透過情境中強調不同適應訴求的操弄，探討雙元自主能力與情境操弄對訊息區辨表現的共同作用效果，以重複檢證雙元自主性模型中對（1）雙元自主能力可以共存，以及（2）不同自主能力各具有範疇優勢性的兩項主張觀點。研究一結果發現：個體化自主與關係自主兩種能力之間具有中度的正相關，再次支持雙元自主取向能力可以相互共存的主張觀點；但兩種自主能力彼此間仍具有可區辨的關聯效度，其中個體化自主能力主要作用於個人範疇的訊息區辨表現上，而關係自主能力主要作用於人際範疇訊息區辨表現上。另外也發現與區辨訊息範疇一致的情境操弄，相較於不一致的情境操弄或是不給予情境操弄，能強化範疇優勢性的作用效果。
為強化研究一的結果，研究二針對研究一的研究限制改善情境操弄的工具與訊息區辨作業，並以台灣北部大學生作為研究對象，其中61位雙元自主能力皆高的雙高組受試者，以及63位雙元自主能力皆低的雙低組受試者。分別邀請至實驗室進行個別的電腦施測，並透過情境脈絡中強調不同適應需求的操弄，再次探討雙元自主能力對訊息區辨表現的範疇優勢性運作機制，結果發現：首先，相對於雙低組，雙高組受試者在個人範疇與人際範疇的訊息區辨表現都比較好，重複檢證雙元自主能力對於訊息區辨的作用效果；其次，相較於不一致的情境操弄或是不給予情境操弄，與區辨訊息範疇一致的情境促發能提升個人範疇與人際範疇的訊息區辨表現。並且發現情境操弄的效果主要作用於發展出高度雙元自主能力的雙高組受試者，在雙低組受試者身上不同的情境操弄則沒有差異，不僅反映出雙元自主能力與情境操弄對訊息區辨表現的共同作用效果，並且重複地驗證雙元自主性模型中共存的理論觀點以及本研究對雙元自主性範疇優勢的運作機制推論。
本文並依據研究發現提出各項討論，論述雙元自主性模型與過去相關文獻與實徵發現的異同。像是（1）該模型採取適應能力的觀點重新詮釋自主性的多元發展取向，進行一系列的實徵研究並且獲得支持的研究結果；（2）採取情境與性格交互運作的系統觀點，說明雙元自主能力的共存與範疇優勢性動態機制；（3）透過非自陳式的訊息區辨表現杜絕共同方法變異的可能威脅，重複檢證該模型的各項理論觀點以及本研究的推論假設；（4）最後針對研究中各項不符合預期的結果提出合理解釋，並且說明未來值得繼續深入探討的相關議題。
This article has two main goals about verifying the ideas of the Dual Autonomy Model (Yeh & Yang, 2006; Yeh, Bedford, & Yang, 2007; Yeh, Liu, Huang, & Yang, 2007). The first is testing the collective effect of dual autonomy and situational operation on message discernment to support the processing mechanism of the domain superiority hypothesis. The second is using the message discernments as performance criteria variable to prevent the common method variance bias and replicate the each hypotheses of dual autonomy. In study 1, 811 senior high school students from north and south of Taiwan as participants were asked to complete a group-survey in their classrooms. A medium correlation between individuating autonomy (IA) and relating autonomy (RA) replicates the coexistence hypothesis. It was also found a distinguishable criterion-validity confirms the domain superiority hypothesis that IA was greater associated with personal domain message discernment but RA was greater associated with interpersonal domain message discernment. This effect of domain superiority was enhanced only under the congruous situational operation condition, shows the collective effect of situation and autonomy capacity that verifies the processing mechanism of domain superiority. For strengthening the result of study 1, study 2 improves the situational operation materials and the message discernment tasks. 61 college students whose dual autonomy both are higher and 63 college students whose dual autonomy both are lower were recruited as participants for study 2 from school in north of Taiwan. They were invited to a small room separately and asked to complete all of the materials and tasks that were presented on computer. The participants with higher dual autonomy have better message discernments of both domains than the participants with lower dual autonomy, replicates the effect of dual autonomy on message discernments. The congruous situational operation produced greater message discriminations than incongruous or none situational operation. This situational effect was only significant on the participants with higher dual autonomy, shows the collective effect of situation and autonomy capacity, confirms the coexist of dual autonomy, and also verifies the processing mechanism of domain superiority. These results and limitations of these two studies, comparison with the past findings, and considerations for future research are discussed. |
| Reference: | 邱佳椿、廖芷妤、侯明賢（民92）。綜合高中學生生涯規劃輔導之探討。技術與職業教育雙月刊，76。
黃子騰（民87）。終生學習與全面品管。「技職雙月刊」，43，39-42。
黃光國（民84）：《知識與行動》。台北：心理出版社。
黃光國（民86）：本土契合性：學術研究的方向或學術研究的判準。本土心理學研究，8， 159-171。
楊國樞（民82）：我們為什麼要建立中國人的本土心理學？本土心理學研究 ，1， 6-88。
Aaker, J. L. and Lee, A. Y. (2001). ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘We’ avoid pains: The role of self regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
Baltes, M. M., & Silverberg, S. B. (1994). The dynamics between dependency and autonomy: Illustrations across the life span. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 41-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of the cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
Beyers, W., Goossens, L., Vansant, I., & Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 32, 351-365.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y. & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-110.
Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S. & Lee, A. Y. (1999). ‘I’ value freedom, but ‘We’ value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment, Psychological Science, 4, 321–326.
Hannover, B., Pöhlmann, C., Springer, A. & Roeder, U. (2005). Implications of independent versus interdependent self-knowledge for motivated social cognition: The semantic procedural interface model of the self. Self and Identity, 5, 159-175.
Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403-422.
Koole, S. L., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2001). What’s in a name: Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 669-685.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In: V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman, eds. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-Cultural Differences in Perspectives on the Self, 49, 1–57. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Miller, J. G. (2003). ‘Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development’, in V. Murphy-Berman and J. J. Berman (eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self, 49: 1-57. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
Morris, M. W., Podolny, J. M., & Ariel, S. (1998). Integrating ‘subjective culture’ and ‘network structuralist’ approaches to country differences: Sociocultural systems and interpersonal obligation in work organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Lexington, KY.
Moskowitz, Gordon B. and Ian W. Skurnik (1999). Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplar primes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 911–27.
Noller, P. (1994). Relationships with parents in adolescence: Process and outcome. In R. Montemayor, G. Adams, & T. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence, 33-77. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Noom, M. J., Dekovic, M. & Meeus, W. H. J. (1999). Autonomy, attachment and psychological adjustment during adolescence: A double-edged sword? Journal of Adolescence, 22, 771–783.
Onorato, R. & Turner, J. C. (2001). The "I", the "me", and the "us": The psychological group and self-concept maintenance and change. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, and collective self. Bristol, PA, USA: Psychology Press.
Petty, Richard E.and John T. Cacioppo (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, New York, NY: Academic Press, 123–205.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology, 41-72. New York: Guilford Press.
Raven, J. C., Raven, J., & Court, J. H. (1998). A manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. London: H. K. Lewis.
Ryan, R. M., (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397-427.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Showers, C. J. (2002). Integration and compartmentalization: A model of self-structure and self-change. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science, 271-291. New York: Guilford Press.
Silverberg, S. B. y Gondoli, D. M. (1996). Autonomy in adolescence. A contextualized perspective. En G.R. Adams, R. Montemayor y T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence, 12-61. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
Spears, R., Gordijn, E., Dijksterhuis, A., & Stapel, D. A. (2004). Reaction in action: Intergroup contrast in automatic behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 605-616.
Stapel, D. A., & Koomen, W. (2001). I, we, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 766–781.
Staple, D. A., & Blanton, H. (2004). From seeing to being: Subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 468-481.
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655.
Yeh, K. H., Bedford, O., & Yang, Y. J. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of the coexistence and domain superiority of individuating and relating autonomy. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 1-20.
Yeh, K. H., Liu, Y. L. & Huang, H. S. (2003). Individuating and Relating: Two autonomy orientations in Chinese adolescents. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology (AASP) on July 29 to August 1, 2003, at Manila, Philippines.
Yeh, K. H., Liu, Y. L., Huang, H. S., & Yang, Y. J. (2007). Individuating and relating autonomy in culturally Chinese adolescents. In J. Liu, C. Ward, A. B. I. Bernardo, M. Karasawa, & R. Fischer (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology: Vol. 5. Global perspectives on Asian social psychology (pp.123-146). Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing.
Yeh, K. H., & Yang, Y. J. (2006). Construct validation of individuating and relating autonomy orientations in culturally Chinese adolescents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 148–160. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
95752009
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0957520091 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [心理學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
