English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49635465      Online Users : 687
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/37244
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37244


    Title: 斯賓諾莎論釋經:《神學政治論》研究
    Spinoza on biblical interpretation: a study of tractatus theologico-politicus
    Authors: 郭大維
    Kuo, Da-Wei
    Contributors: 楊世雄
    曾慶豹

    Yang, Shih-HSiung
    Chin, Ken Pa

    郭大維
    Kuo, Da-Wei
    Keywords: 神學-政治問題
    解釋者
    聖經研究
    方法論
    德性
    theologico-political problem
    interpreter
    bible study
    methodology
    virtue
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 12:48:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 斯賓諾莎的《神學政治論》向來被認為是現代自由民主、與聖經批判的哲學性起源,學者大多認為斯賓諾莎以一種科學式的方法來研究聖經。本文旨在研究斯賓諾莎的聖經觀與宗教觀。藉著對十七世紀荷蘭神學-政治背景、以及《神學政治論》第七章到第十五章的分析,來說明斯賓諾莎所關心的並不是「如何解釋聖經」,而是「誰有權釋經」。他並不是藉著一種客觀的方法論來研究聖經,而是將解釋聖經的判准建立在解釋者的德性之上。而後不斷質疑各種可能形成解釋權威、壟斷信仰的科學式或理論性宗教知識。他把信仰的本質還原為生活,並且主張唯有解釋者有道德行為,他對聖經的解釋才可能是真的。因此,斯賓諾莎解釋聖經的方式不是一種聖經批判,而是一種德性證成的觀點。藉此,他把解釋聖經的權利還諸一切信仰者,並且將哲學與神學分離,前者的基礎是思辨理論,後者的基礎是道德實踐。
    Spinoza`s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus has always been regarded as the philosophical origin of modern liberal democracy and modern biblical criticism. Most scholars consider Spinoza’s biblical study as a kind of scientific method. This thesis aims at Spinoza’s view of the Bible and his view of religion. By a description of the theological-political background of the 17th century Dutch, and an analysis of Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Chapters 7 through 15, I would demonstrate that Spinoza cares not “how to study the Scripture” but “who has the authority to interpret the Scripture.” He does not study the Scripture by means of an objective methodology, rather, he sets up the criteria of biblical interpretation upon the virtue of interpreters. Then he doubts constantly every kind of theoretical knowledge of religion which may become the authority of interpretation and monopolize the faith. He reduces the essence of faith to life, and claims that only when an interpreter is moral, can his interpretation of the Scripture be true. Therefore, Spinoza’s interpretation of the Bible is not a kind of biblical-criticism, but a kind of justification by means of virtue. By doing so (or simply “Thus”), he returns the right of interpreting Scripture back to all believers, and separates philosophy away from theology. The foundation of philosophy is speculative theory, and theology is based on moral practices.
    Reference: Aubrey, John. Brief Lives. Edited by Andrew Clark. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898s.
    Bentley, Jerry. Humanist and Holy Writ: New Testament in the Renaissance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983.
    Curely, Edwin. "Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (I): Spinoza and the Science of Hermeneutics." In Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, edited by Graeme Hunter. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994.
    Descartes, René, G. R. T. Ross, and Elizabeth Sanderson Haldane. The Philosophical Works of Descartes. London: Cambridge U.P., 1967.
    Freudenthal, J. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza`s in Quellenschriften, Urkunden Und Nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Verlag Von Veit, 1899.
    Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Ma. 2nd, Revised ed. New York: Continuum, 2004.
    Garrett, Don. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
    Goudriaan, Aza. Reformed Orthodoxy and Philosophy, 1625-1750 : Gisbertus Voetius, Petrus Van Mastricht, and Anthonius Driessen. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
    Harrisville, Roy A., and Walter Sundberg. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans Pub., 2002.
    Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan with Selected Vaeiants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Edited by Edwin Curley. Cambridge: Hackett, 1994.
    Hunter, Graeme. Radical Protestantism in Spinoza`s Thought. Aldershot, England ; Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2005.
    Israel, Jonathan. "Introduction." In Theological-Political Treatise, edited by Jonathan Israel, viii-xxxi. New York: Cambridge, 2007.
    Israel, Jonathan Irvine. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    Lang, Berel. "The Politics of Interpretation: Spinoza`s Modernist Turn." Review of Metaphysics 43 (1989): 338-48.
    Maimonides, Moses. The Guide for the Perplexed. Translated by M. Friedländer. skokie, illinois: Varda Books, 2002.
    Meijer, L., S. Shirley, and L. Rice. Philosophy as the Interpreter of Holy Scripture (1666): Marquette University Press, 2004.
    Mendes, David Franco. "Memorias Do Estabelecimento E Progresso Dos Judeos Portuguezes E Espanhoes Nesta Famosa Citade De Amsterdam." Studia Rosenthaliana 9 (1975).
    Nadler, Steven. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    Popkin, R. H. "Spinoza and Bible Scholarship." In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, edited by Don Garrett, 383-407. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1996.
    ———. "Spinoza and La Peyrère." In Spinoza New Perspective, edited by R. W. Shahan and J. I. Biro, 177-95. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1978.
    ———. "Spinoza and Samuel Fisher." Philosophia(Ramat Gan) 15, no. 3 (1985): 219-36.
    Popkin, Richard H., and Richard Henry Popkin. The History of Scepticism : From Savonarola to Bayle. Rev. and expanded ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
    Preus, James S. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part I: Religion on the Margins: Conversos and Collegiants." Religion 28, no. 1 (1998): 3-14.
    ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Ii: The Rise and Fall of the Bible." Religion 28, no. 1 (1998): 15-27.
    ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Iii: The Hidden Dialogue in Spinoza`s Tractatus." Religion 28, no. 2 (1998): 111-24.
    ———. "The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius, Part Iv: Prophecy, Knowledge, and the Study of Religion." Religion 28, no. 2 (1998): 125-38.
    ———. "A Hidden Opponent in Spinoza`s Tractatus." The Harvard Theological Review 88, no. 3 (1995): 361-88.
    ———. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    Revah, I. S. Spinoza Et Juan De Prado. Paris: Mouton & Co., 1959.
    Rummel, Erika, ed. Biblical Humanism and Scholasticism in the Age of Erasmus. Vol. 9, A Series of Handbooks and Reference Works on the Intellectual and Religious Life of Europe, 500-1700. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
    Spinoza, Benedictus de. Complete Works. Translated by Samuel Shirley and Michael L. Morgan. Edited by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2002.
    Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Carl Gebhardt. Opera. Gebhardt, Carl ed. Vol. 5 vols. Heidelberg: C. Winters, 1972.
    Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Jonathan Israel. Theological-Political Treatise, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
    Spinoza, Benedictus de, and Samuel Shirley. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus : (Gebhardt Edition, 1925). Leiden: Brill, 1989.
    Spinoza, Benedictus de, Samuel Shirley, and Michael L. Morgan. Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 2002.
    Strauss, Leo. Persecution and the Art of Writing. University of Chicago Press ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
    ———. Spinoza`s Critique of Religion. New York: Schocken, 1965.
    Stuermann, Walter E. . "Benedict Spinoza: A Pioneer in Biblical Criticism." Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 29 (1960-1961): 133-79.
    Wielema, Michiel. "Adriaan Koerbagh: Biblical Criticism and Enlightenment." In The Early Enlightenent in the Dutch Republic, 1650-1750, edited by Wiep van Bunge, 61-80. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    92154013
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0921540131
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    54013101.pdf93KbAdobe PDF2963View/Open
    54013102.pdf141KbAdobe PDF21176View/Open
    54013103.pdf110KbAdobe PDF2982View/Open
    54013104.pdf105KbAdobe PDF2925View/Open
    54013105.pdf240KbAdobe PDF21313View/Open
    54013106.pdf395KbAdobe PDF21527View/Open
    54013107.pdf462KbAdobe PDF21216View/Open
    54013108.pdf350KbAdobe PDF21144View/Open
    54013109.pdf293KbAdobe PDF21195View/Open
    54013110.pdf400KbAdobe PDF21392View/Open
    54013111.pdf123KbAdobe PDF2988View/Open
    54013112.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21180View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback