Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37309
|
| Title: | 政府網站服務品質指標建構之研究 |
| Authors: | 周思伶 |
| Contributors: | 蕭乃沂
周思伶 |
| Keywords: | 電子化政府
政府網站
網站服務品質
層級分析法
e-government
government website
e-service quality
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-19 13:07:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 當政府機關開始大量的透過網路傳遞服務給民眾，政府迫切需要知道民眾對政府網站服務品質的認知評價為何。然而該如何衡量政府網站的服務品質至今仍沒有一個明確的方法。本論文旨在建構一套可以用來衡量政府網站服務品質的指標同時對政府網站服務品質提出相關的政策建議。本研究使用了線上問卷調查法與層級分析法，利用網路問卷線上調查了使用者對政府網站服務品質的評價，然後請專家利用層級分析法分析並計算出這些指標的相對權重。
本研究主要結果如下：(1).建構適合衡量台灣政府的網站服務品質指標，包含「設計性」、「易用性」、「可靠性」、「資訊品質」、「有用性」與「回應性」六大構面，而六大構面下共包含三十項指標；(2).實際調查台灣網路民眾對政府網站服務品質評價，發現民眾對政府網站服務品質的「有用性」相對評價最高，而對政府網站「回應性」的服務品質則是相對最不肯定；(3).請專家透過層級分析法對政府網站服務品質指標做出重要性權重排序，整體而言，專家給予「資訊品質」相對最高的權重，後依序是「有用性」、「回應性」、「可靠性」、「易用性」，而「設計性」則是專家排序中相對最不重視的；(4).比較專家與民眾對政府網站服務品質指標重要性與評價的差異，發現就評估構面而言，「資訊品質」與「回應性」是專家認為相對重要，但民眾基於使用經驗相對不肯定的指標，應該列為政府提昇網站服務品質優先改善的構面
基於上述研究發現，作者提出了隨時檢視資訊更新程度、替使用者重新編寫資訊與強化政府網站的回應能力等三點研究建議，以期待徹底提昇政府網站的服務品質。
As government organizations have increasingly provided services to the public via Internet, e-government websites have demanded acute understanding of how the users perceived the service quality. However concerning it is not clear how the e-service quality of e-government websites can be measured. This thesis aims to construct the indicators to evaluate e-service quality of e-government websites and propose management suggestions to government. The research methods of this thesis include an online survey and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). A survey was conducted with online users being asked to evaluate the e-service quality of e-government websites. Then AHP was applied to analysis and compute the weights of these indicators from the experts.
The key findings are: First, Design, Usability, Reliability, Information Quality, Usefulness, and Responsiveness are key dimensions of e-service quality of e-government in Taiwan. Second, most of the online users are satisfied with the Usefulness of e-government websites in Taiwan, but they are not satisfied with the Responsiveness of e-government websites in Taiwan. Third, for the evaluation aspects, the sequence of importance for the e-service quality of e-government websites in Taiwan is Information Quality, Usefulness, Responsiveness, Reliability, Usability and Design. Among them, the domain experts think Information Quality and Responsiveness are relatively important aspects of e-service quality of e-government websites in Taiwan. However, general online users are not satisfied with these two aspects. So these two aspects should be listed on the top priority for improvement straight away.
Based on the research findings, the author proposes three policy suggestions to improve the websites in Taiwan’s government. First, keep the information on the government websites most updated. Second, improve the information readability for online users. Finally enhance the responsiveness of government websites. |
| Reference: | 于榮握(2005)。內部顧客導向之高雄市長電子信箱改進策略研究。高雄：國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士在職專班未出版之碩士論文。
方維琳(2001)。台灣入口網站服務品質之研究。台北：國立台北科技大學商業自動化與管理研究所未出版之論文。
古麗如 (2004)。臺北市政府「市長信箱」處理機制與案件內容之研究。台北：銘傳大學公共事務研究所未出版之碩士論文。
朱國瑋、黃珺、龔完全(2006)。電子政府公眾滿意度測評研究。情報科學，24(8)，2115-2130。
江明修等(2000)。各國行政改革之比較及其對我國之啟示：面對千禧政黨輪替後的新思維，發表於八十九四月二十九日新世紀的行政理論與實務研討會，政治大學公共行政學系。
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2000)。行政機關網站評獎要點(草案)規劃 。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.nii.org.tw/Content/schedule.htm
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2001)。電子化政府整合型入口網站發展計畫。台北：行政院。取自：http://www7.www.gov.tw/about/files/egportal.pdf
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2005a)。全面提升政府網站服務品質專案研究報告。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=16904&ctNode=6015
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2005b)。電子化民主之研究。台北：行政院。
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2005c)。94年度行政機關網站評獎實施計畫。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4029278&CtNode=12226&mp=100
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2006)。九十五年度第四季電子化重要工作及具體成果。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=18790&ctNode=8980
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2007a)。電子化政府96年度報告書。台北：行政院。
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2007b)。優質網路政府計畫(97年至100年) 。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=8977&CtUnit=1072&BaseDSD=7
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2007c)。行政院研究發展考核委員會政府網站版型與內容管理規範研究報告書。台北：行政院。取自：
http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4087234&ctNode=9922&mp=100
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2007d)。九十六年數位落差調查報告 。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=19790&CtNode=8706&mp=22
行政院研究發展考核委員會（2007e） 「96年民眾對電子化政府相關議題的看法」民意調查（民國96年5月）。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/Data/89261644071.pdf
行政院主計處(2007)。2007年社會指標統計表。台北：行政院。取自：http://eng.stat.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs2/socialindicator/2007/education-table.xls
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2008a)。九十六年數位落差調查報告 。台北：行政院。取自：http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=19790&CtNode=8706&mp=22
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2008b)。政府網站功能民主化。台北：行政院。
行政院研究考核發展委員會(2008c)。我國電子化政府之影響評估。台北：行政院。
呂東壕(2005)。應用Kano,模糊層級分析法與品質機能展開法於線上服務品質之研究。新竹市：中華大學資訊管理學系研究所未出版之論文。
李政忠(2004)。網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議。資訊社會研究(6)，1-24。取自http://www.rdec.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=8556&CtUnit=1071&BaseDSD=7
周韻采(2003)。電子化政府績效的比較研究：以政府入口網站為例。公共行政學報，9，35-58。
林立宜(2002)。運用模糊成級分析法(FAHP)建立護理之家服務品質指標。雲林：國立雲林科技大學管理研究所未出版之論文。
林震岩(2007)。多變量分析SPSS的操作與應用。台北市：智勝文化事業有限公司。
財團法人資訊工業策進會創新應用服務研究所創新應用中心 (資策會)(2008)。2007我國家庭寬頻、行動與無線應用現況與需求調查分析報告。台北：經濟部工業局。
陳俊明、蕭乃沂 (2004)。網際網路時代公民直接參與的機會與挑戰：民意電子信箱的再檢視。發表於行政院研考會電子化民主新趨勢研討會。
陳啟光、鄭傑升、王國明(2002)，電子化政府推動成效評估量表之建構—民眾主觀認知構面之探討，中國工業工程學刊，19( 2)，39-52。
陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂，(2001)。臺北市政府接受人民施政意見反應機制之研究。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會委託研究案研究報告。
陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂、郭思禹 (2005)。官僚回應性與內部顧客關係管理：台北市政府市長信箱個案研究。發表於2005年4月7-8日兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會，中國北京。
曾淑芬(2002) 數位落差，資訊社會研究，2，234-237。
曾慰親(1997)。我國企業網路發展現況及關鍵成功因素之研究。台北：國立政治大學未出版之碩士論文。
黃建國(2006)。政府為民服務網路申辦系統的服務品質:以「台北市民e點通」為例，台北：世新大學行政管理學系未出版碩士論文。
黃朝盟，(2001a)。電子化政府網站的可用性原則。行政暨政策學報，3，185-212。
黃朝盟，(2001b)。電子化政府的網站設計與評估。台北：韋伯。
黃朝盟、趙美慧 (2007)。網站規劃與設計。台北：商鼎文化出版社。
鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)，中國統計學報，27( 7)，1-15。
鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)，中國統計學報，27( 6)，5-22。
盧彥旭(2000)。資訊系統委外選商評選準則及權重之建立。台北：世新大學資訊管理研究所未出版之論文。
蕭乃沂、陳敦源、黃東益 (2003)。網路民主政府：台北市市長信箱的評估與前瞻。研考雙月刊，27(1)，100-110。
謝玉粟(2002)。虛擬政府的服務品質探討，高雄：國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
謝育文(1985)。分析層級程序法 (AHP) 應用在我國個人電腦用印表機開發之研究。台北：國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
謝培仁(2002)。電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究--以電子化政府入口網站為例，台北:國立台北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
Aladwani & Palvia (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user- perceived web quality. Information and management, 39, 467-476.
American Customer Satisfaction Index (2006), The American Customer Satisfaction Index – The Voice of the Nation’s Consumer. Retrieved from
Anderson, R.E., Srinivasan, S.S. (2003). E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a contingency framework. Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 123-138.
Banatre, M., Issarny V., Leleu F. & Charpiot B. (1997). Providing Quality of Service Over the Web: A Newspaper-Based Approach, Computer Networks, 29, 1457-1465
Bansal, H.S., McDougall, G.H.G., Dikolli, S.S., & Sedatole K.L.(2004). Relating e-satisfaction to behavior outcomes: an empirical study. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(4), 290-302.
Barnes, S. & Vidgen, R. (2004), Interactive e-government: evaluating the web site of the UK Inland Revenue, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1), 42-63.
Baty, J. B. & Ronald M. L.(1995). Intershop: Enhancing the endor/Customer Dialectic in Electronic Shopping. Journal of Information Systems, 11 (4), 9-31.
Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Zouridis, S. (1999). Electronic service delivery in public administration: Some trends and issues. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65(2), 183−196.
Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of obstacles and implications from an international perspective. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
Cai, S. & Jun M. (2003). Internet Users’ Perceptions of Online Service Quality: A Comparison of Online Buyers and Information Searchers. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 504-519.
Chang, Liu, Aenett, Kirk p.(2000). Exploring the Factors Associated with Web Site Success in the Context of Electronic Commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23-33.
Clift, S.(2002). The future of e-democracy-The 50 year plan. Retrieved from http://www.publicus.net/articles/future.html
Collier, J.E. and Bienstock, C.C. (2006). Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing, Journal of service research, 8(3), 260-275.
Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4): 464-494.
Cristobal, E., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2007). Perceived e-service quality: Measurement validity and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty. Managing Service Quality, 17 (3), 317-340.
Crosby, P. B.( 1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain, New York: New American Library.
Davis, D (1989). Perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologym. MIS Quarterly, p319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P.R.(1989). User acceptance of computer
De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. & Kleijnen, M.(2001). Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12, 2, 184-207.
DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R.(1992). Information System Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.(2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems , 19(4), 9-30.
DiCaterino, A. & Pardo T. A. (Eds.) (1996). The World Wide Web as a Universal
Duffy, D. (2000). Q&A: Balancing the role of e-Government: Interview with Mike Hernon, vice president of e-government for New York City-based GovWorks. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/11/13/qna.egov.idg/.
e-Government Unit, DG Information Society, European Commission (2004). Top of the web: user satisfaction and usage survey of e-government services, Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/egovernment_research/doc/top_of_the_web_report_2004.pdf
Eriksson L., Friman M. & Norman A. C.(2007). Electronic Service Quality: Public Transport Information on the Internet. Journal of Public Transportation, 10, 3, 35-46.
ExpertChoice2000(EC2000) Retrieved from http://www.expertchoice.com/.
Fassnacht, M. & Koese, I.(2006). Quality of electronic Services: conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. Journal of Service Research, 9(1), 19-37.
Fassnacht, M. & Koese, I. (2006). Quality of electronic Services: conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. Journal of Service Research, 9(1) , 19-37.
Field, J.M., Heim, G.R., & Sinha, K.K.(2004). Managing quality in the e-service system: Development and application of a process model. Production and Operations Management, 13(4), 291-306.
Finger M., Misuraca G. and Rossel P.（2006）. Governance with and of ICTs: the need for new institutional design in a changing world. egov magazine, 2(5).
Forman, E. & Peniwati, K., (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165-169.
Gant, D. B, & Gant, J. P. (2002). State Web Portals: Delivering and Financing E-Service. E-Government Series, p.1-55.
Gant, D. B. & Gant, J. P. (2003). Enhancing E-Service Delivery in State Government. In E-Government 2003, Eds, Abramson, M.A. & Moran, T.L. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, Maryland.
Garvin , D.A. (1984) . What Does Product Quality Really Mean?” , Sloan Management Review ,26 , 25-43 .
Ghere, R. K., & Young, B. A. (1998). The cyber-management environment: Where technology and ingenuity meet public purpose and accountability. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.pamij.com/gypaper.html
Ghosh, S., Surjadjaja, H., and Antony, J. (2004). Optimisation of the determinants of e-service operations. Business Process Management Journal, 10(6), 616-635.
Government: 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005, Copenhagen.
Gronroos , C.(1984) . A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implication, European Journal of Marketing, 18 (4), 36-44.
Ha, L. & James E. L. (1998). Interactivity Reexamined: A Baseline Analysis for Early Business Web Sites. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42 (4), 457-474.
Halpern, D. F. (1996). Changing data, changing minds: What the data on cognitive sex. differences tell us and what we hear. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.),Psychological and psychobiological perspectives on sex differences in cognition II. Commentaries and Controversies [Special Issue]. Learning and Individual Differences, 8 , 71-80.
Heeks, R. (1998). Information systems and public sector accountability. The University of Manchester, Institute for Development, Policy and Management Information, Systems, Technology and Government: Working Papers Series, Number 1/1998. Retrieved from http://idpm.man.ac.uk/idpm/isps_wp1.htm.
Heeks, R. (1999). Public sector accountability: Can IT deliver? The University of Manchester, Institute for Development, Policy and Management Information, Systems, Technology and Government: Short Papers Series, Number 1/1998.
Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development. The University of Manchester, Institute for Development, Policy and Management Information, Systems, Technology and Government: Working Papers Series, Number 11/2001. Retrieved from http://idpm.man.ac.uk/idpm/igov11abs.htm.
Heim G. R., Field J. M. (2007). Process drivers of e-service quality: Analysis of data from an online rating site. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 962–984.
Ho, A. T.- K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434–444.
Hoque, A.Y.& Lohse,G.L. (1999). An Information Search Cost Perspective for Designing Interfaces for Electronic Commerce. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 387-394.
Horan, T.A., Abhichandani, T. & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of e-government services: development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Horrigan, J., Rainie, L., Fox, S., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., Lewis, O. & Carter, C. (2000). The Holidays Online: Emails and e-Greetings Outpace e-Commerce. Pew Internet and American Life Project.Washington, D. C.
Http://www.theacsi.org
Huang, C. & Chao, M. H.(2001). Managing WWW in Public dministration: Uses and Misuses. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 357-373.
Interface to Government Service. New York: University at Albany.
ISO/ IEC 9126- 1(2001). Information technology-software quality characteristics and metrics-Part1: Quality characteristics and subcharacteristics. International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
ISO9241-11. 引自User Centred Design Standards, http://www.usability.serco.com/trump/resources/standards.html.
James, L. E. and K. C. Alman(1996). Consumer expectations of the information content in advertisment. International Journal of Advertising,15(1),75-88.
Janda, S., Trocchis, P.J, & Gwinner, K.P. (2002). Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(5), 412-431.
Jansen, A. & Ølnes, S. (2004). Quality assessment and benchmarking of Norwegian public web sites. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-government, Dublin.
Jun,M. & Yang,Z.,& Kim D. (2004). Customers’ perceptions of online retailing service quality and their satisfaction. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(8), 817-840.
Juran. J. M. (1989). Juran on Leadership for Quality, New York: Juran Institute.
Kim, T.H., Im, K.H. & Park, S.C. (2005). Intelligent measuring and improving model for customer satisfaction level in e-government. paper presented at the Electronic
La Porte, T. M., De Jong, M., & Demchak, C. C. (1999). Public organizations on the World Wide Web: Empirical correlates of administrative openness. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference (Texas A & M Univ., Dec. 3, 1999).
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122−136.
Li, Meng-Hao & Lin, Chin-Yao & Chen, Wei-Chu (2003).A New Approach of Digital Divide: An Empirical Study in Taiwan, 2003 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta.
Li, Y. N., Tan, K. C & Xie, M. (2002), Measuring Web-based Service Quality. Total Quality Management, 13(5), 685-700.
Lohse, G. L. & Spiller P.(1998). Electronic Shopping. Communications of the ACM, 41, 81-88.
Lohse, G. L.& Spiller, P. (1999). Internet Retail Store Design: How the User Interface Influences Traffic and Sales. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(2),
Loiacono, E. T., Richard, T. W. & Dale, L. G. (2000). WebQual: A Web Site Quality Instrument, working Paper, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Loiacono, E. T., Richard, T. W. & Dale, L. G. (2002). WebQUAL: A Measure of WebSite Quality, Marketing Theory and Applications, 13, 432-438.
Martensen , A. , Gronholdt , L. & Kristensen , K. (2000). Bricks to Clicks: What Drives Customer Use of the Internet in a Multichannel Enviroment. Working Paper, Caroline State University.
McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2000). The Chief Information Officer (CIO): Assessing its impact. Government Information Quarterly,17, 7−12.
McGregor, E. B., Jr. (2001). Web page accountability: The case of public schools. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
Means, G., & Schneider, D. (2000). Meta-capitalism: The e-business revolution and the design of 21st century companies and markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Merwe, R. van der, and Bekker, J. (2003). A framework and methodology for evaluating e-commerce web sites. Internet Research: electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13(5), 330-341.
Nielsen, J. & Loranger, H. (2006).Prioritizing Web Usability.New Riders.
Nielsen, J. (1993), Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press.
Nielsen, J. (1994), Usability Engineering, Boston, MA: AP Professional, Academic Press.
Nielsen, J. (2000), Designing Web Usability. New Riders Publishing.
OECD,( 2001) Understanding the digital divide . Retrieved December 15, 2008, from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf
Okot-Uma, R. (2004). Building Cyberlaw Capacity for eGovernance: Technology Perspectives. Presented at a Commonwealth Regional Pacific Workshop on Law and Technology, Wellington, New Zealand.
Parasuraman, A., Valarie, A. Z., & Leonard, L. B., (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for future Research, Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50.
Parasuraman, A., Valarie, A. Z., & Leonard, L. B., (1988), SERVQUAL: A Multiple Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml V. A. & Malhotra A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233.
Peters R. M,Janessen M. & Engers T. M.,(2004). Measurement of e-Government Impact: Existing practices and shortcomings.Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce.
Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T. & Kavan, C. B.(1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19( 2) 173-188.
Poynter Institute (2000). Stanford-Poynter Project/Eye tracking online news. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from:http://www.poynterextra.org/et/i.htm
Rainey, H. G. & Bozeman B.(2000). Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-470.
Ramanathan, R., Ganesh, L.S., (1994). Group Preference Aggregation Methods Employed in AHP: An Evaluation and Intrinsic Process for Deriving Members’ Weightages. European Journal of Operational Research, 79, 249-265.
Retrieved from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/publications/wp/igovernment/short/igov_sp01.pdf
Rowley, J. (2006). An analysis of the e-service literature: Towards a research agenda. Internet Research, 16 (3), 339-359.
Rust, R. T. & Kannam, P. K.(2003). E-service: a new paradigm for business in electronic environment, Communication of the ACM, 46, 6, 37-42
Rust, R. T. & Lemon, K. N.(2001). E-service and the consumer. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 85-101.
Ruyter, Ko de, Wetzels, M., and Kleijnen, M. (2001). Customer adoption of e-service: An experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(2), 184-207.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Santos, J. (2003). E-service Quality - a Model of Virtual Service Dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 233-247.
Schelin, S. H. (2003). E-Government: An overview. In G. David Garson (Ed.), Public information technology: Policy and management issues. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Sukasame, N. (2004), The development of e-service in Thai government, BU Academic Review, 3, Retrieved from http://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epaper/jan_june2004/nittana.pdf
technology: A comparison of two theorical models. Management Science, 35(8), p982-1003.
The Markle Foundation(2001). Toward a framework for Internet accountability (on-line report) Retrieved from http://www.markle.org/markle_programs/project_archives/2000/frameworkaccountability.php
United Nations (UN) & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. New York, NY: U.N. Publications.
Wangpipatwong S., Chutimaskul W. & Papasratorn B. (2005). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Thai eGovernment Websites: Information Quality and System Quality Approach. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on eBusiness: the Digital Lifestyle and the Road Ahead, Thailand, November 19-20, 2005 and Special Issue of the International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13, SP3, 14.1-14.7.
Webb，Harold W. & Linda A. Webb.(2004). SiteQual: An Integrated Measure of Web Site Quality. The Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(6), 430-440.
West, D. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.
Wnag, L., Bretschneider, S., & Gant, J.(2005). Evaluating Web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Wolfinbarger, M. & Gilly, M.C. (2003). “eTailQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and pedicting etail quality,” Journal of Retailing ,79(3), 183-198.
Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Gilly, M. C.( 2002). .comQ: Dimensionalizing, Measuring and Predicting Quality of the E-tail Experience. Working Paper, No. 02-100, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA
Yang, Z., Jun, M. & Peterson, R.T.(2004). Measuring customer perceived online service quality: scale development and managerial implications, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(11), 1149-1174.
Yang, Z., Peterson R. T. & Huang L.(2001). Taking the Pulse of Internet Pharmacies, Marketing Health Service, 21(2), 4-10.
Yang, Z., Peterson, R.T. & Cai, S. (2003). Service Quality Dimensions of Internet Retailing: an Exploratory Analysis. The Journal of Service Marketing, 17(7), 685-700.
Yoo, B. & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (Sitequal). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 31-46.
Zeithaml V. A. , Parasuraman, A. & Malhotra A. (2000). E-service quality: Definition, dimensions and conceptual model. Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute. Cambridge: MA.
Zeithaml V. A. , Parasuraman, A. & Malhotra A. (2002), Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362-376. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
95256009
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095256009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
