English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47880888      Online Users : 875
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37358


    Title: 估價師部分調整行為之研究－以不動產證券化重估價為例
    Appraiser partial adjustment behavior: evidence from T-REITs reappraisals
    Authors: 賴靖雯
    Contributors: 陳奉瑤
    Chen, Fong Yao
    賴靖雯
    Keywords: 部分調整
    行為財務學
    模糊趨避
    台灣不動產投資信託
    appraiser partial adjustment
    behavioral finance
    ambiguity aversion
    T-REITs
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 13:15:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 估價平滑相關研究大多採取Quan and Quigley（1991）提出的理性行為解釋估價師的部分調整行為。然而財務行為學認為行為人通常具有非理性的行為，因此本研究以保守性心理偏誤解釋部分調整行為，探討非理性心理對於估價師之影響。為了捕捉估價師個體的行為資訊，本研究以台灣不動產投資信託的重估價結果作為研究資料，檢視估價師對市場新資訊和過去估值的處理行為。本研究首先應用部分調整模型進行實證分析，結果發現台灣估價師確實具有部分調整行為，相對較低估市場價值資訊的權重，而此類保守性偏誤即為總體估價平滑效果的展現。此外進一步以Tobit Model進行市場價值資訊權重的影響因素分析，結果發現市場資訊的權重會受到心理效果而改變，當估價方法價值差異率越大時，估價師會降低市場資訊的權重，展現了對模糊事件的趨避傾向。捷思法可以幫助估價師提升效率，但過度依賴捷思法亦有可能引發錯誤和偏差；本研究發現模糊趨避效果顯示估價師更重視市場資訊的可信度，似較符合估價證據之要求，故非理性心理偏誤對估價師言非全為負面影響。
    Previous appraisal smoothing studies were based on the appraiser rational behavior assumptions which developed by Quan and Quigley (1991) and found that appraisers do insufficiently react to market fluctuate. However, this paper starts with behavioral finance theory to investigate the partial adjustment behavior of Taiwan appraisers, using the reappraisals of Taiwan Real Estate Investment Trust (T-REITs) to show each appraiser’s behavioral intention at disaggregate level which could be diversified away at aggregate level. This study tests the partial adjustment model to observe the weights of new market information and previous estimates of the same property reappraisal. The results show that Taiwan appraisers more rely on the previous estimates, namely the conservatism bias, which will induce the appraisal smoothing at aggregate level. Further, the Tobit Model is employed to test the influence factors of appraisers’ weight on new market information, and the results show weights on new market information will be affected by appraisers’ heuristics. There is a negative effect to weights on new market information which stands for the ambiguity aversion of appraisers. It shows appraiser do concern about the reliability of market evidence which is much accord with the appraisal normative model.
    Reference: 1. 王士鳴，2006，「不動產估價師信心判斷行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    2. 李易璇，2005，「不動產估價人員估值行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    3. 汪駿旭，2005，「不動產估價人員受客戶影響之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    4. 林英彥，2007，『不動產估價』，台北：文笙書局。
    5. 施能仁，施純楨，施若竹，2004，『計量經濟』，台北：高立圖書。
    6. 徐詩怡，2007，「不動產估價師與地價人員估值決定行為之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，台北市。
    7. 張能政，2004，「不動產估價行為研究—行為理論之應用」，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文，台北市。
    8. 梁仁旭，陳奉瑤，2006，『不動產估價』，台北：陳奉瑤。
    9. 郭敏華，2008，『行為財務學—當財務學遇上心理學』，台北：智勝文化。
    10. 游適銘，2007，「不動產證券化發行金額與估價方法估值關聯探討」，論文發表於中華民國住宅學會第十六屆年會學術研討會論文集，中華民國住宅學會：台北，頁61-75。
    11. Accetta, G.J., 1998, “Supporting capitalization rates”, The Appraisal Journal, 66(4): 371-374.
    12. Babbie, E.R.著，陳文俊譯，2006，『社會科學研究方法』，台北：雙葉書廊。
    13. Baum, A., N. Crosby, P. Gallimore, P. McAllister, A. Gray, 2000, The Influence Of Valuers And Valuations On The Workings Of The Commercial Property Investment Market . UK: Reading and Nottingham Trent Universities.
    14. Brown, G. R., and G. A. Matysiak, 1998, “Valuation Smoothing without Temporal Aggregation”, Journal of Property Research, 15(2):89-103.
    15. Clapp, J.M., 1990, “A new test for equitable real estate tax assessment”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 3(3):233 – 249.
    16. Clayton, J., D. Geltner, and S. W. Hamilton, 2001, “Smoothing in Commercial Property Valuation: Evidence from Individual Appraisals”, Real Estate Economics, 29(3) 337-360.
    17. Diaz, J., 1990, "How Appraisers Do Their Work: A Test of the Appraisal Process and the Development of a Descriptive Model," Journal of Real Estate Research, 5(1): 1-16.
    18. Diaz, J., 1997, “An Investigation into the Impact of Previous Expert Value Estimate on Appraisal Judgment”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 13(1):57-66.
    19. Diaz, J., 2002, Behavioural Research in Appraisal and Some Perspectives on Implications for Practice, RICS Foundation Research Review Series, London: RICS Foundation.
    20. Diaz, J. and J. A. Hansz, 1997, “How Valuers Use the Value Opinions of Others”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15(3):256-260.
    21. Diaz, J. and M. Wolverton, 1998, “A Longitudinal Examination of the Appraisal Smoothing Hypothesis”, Real Estate Economics, 26(2):349-358.
    22. Edwards, W., 1962, “Conservatism in human information processing”, Edited by Kleimutz, B., Representation of Human Judgement, New York, 17-52.
    23. Fox, C.R. and A. Tversky, 1995, “Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance”, the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3):585-603.
    24. Fisher, J., M. Miles, and R. Webb, 1999, “How Reliable are Commercial Property Appraisals? Another Look”, Real Estate Finance, 16(3):9-15.
    25. Gallimore P., 2002, “Real Estate Valuation Theory: The components of appraisal accuracy”, US, Edited by K. Wang and M. Wolverton, Appraisal Institute and American Real Estate Society.
    26. Geltner, D., 1989a, “Bias in Appraisal-Based Returns”, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association (AREUEA Journal), 17(3): 338–352.
    27. Geltner, D., 1989b, “Estimating Real Estate’s Systematic Risk from Aggregate Level Appraisal-Based Returns”, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 17(4): 463–81.
    28. Geltner, D., 1991, “Smoothing in Appraisal-Based Returns”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4:327-345.
    29. Geltner, D., R.A. Graff and M. Young, 1994,"Random Disaggregate Appraisal Error in Commercial Property: Evidence from the Russell-NCREIF Database" Journal of Real Estate Research, 9(4):403-420.
    30. Geltner, D., 1998, “Appraisal Smoothing: The Other Side of the Story—A Comment”, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=131459, Working Paper, Department of Finance, University of Cincinnati.
    31. Graff, R. and M.S. Young, 1999, “The Magnitude of Random Appraisal Error in Commercial Real Estate Valuation”, Journal of Real Estate Research, 17(2):33-54.
    32. Graff, R. and J. Webb, 1997, “Agency costs and inefficiency in commercial real estate”, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 3(1):19-37.
    33. Hansz, J.A. and J. Diaz, 2001, “Valuation Bias in Commercial Appraisal: A Transaction Price Feedback Experiment”, Real Estate Economics, 29(4): 553-565.
    34. Hansz, J. A., 2004, “Prior Transaction Price Induced Smoothing: Testing and Calibrating the Quan-Quigley Model at the Disaggregate Level”, Journal of Property Research, 21(4):321-336.
    35. Heath, C. and A. Tversky, 1991, “Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1):5-28.
    36. Hirshleifer, D., 2001, “Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing.”, The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533-1597.
    37. Ibbotson, R. and L. B. Siegel, 1984, “Real Estate Return: a Comparison with Other Investment”, AREUEA, 12:219-242.
    38. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1973, “On the Psychology of Prediction”, Psychological Review, 80(4):237-251.
    39. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Econometrica, 47(2):263-291.
    40. Knight, F., 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit., Houghton Mifflin: New York.
    41. Lai, T.Y., and K. Wang, 1998, “Appraisal Smoothing: The Other Side of Story”, Real Estate Economics, 26(3): 511-535.
    42. Lizieri, C., And C. Ward, 2001, “Commercial Real Estate Return Distributions: A Review of Literature and Empirical Evidence”, Working Paper, University of Reading.
    43. Levy, D. and E. Schuck, 1999, “The Influence of Clients on Valuation”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4):380-400.
    44. Mcallister, P., A. Baum, N. Crosby, P. Gallimore, and A. Gray, 2003, “Appraiser behaviour and appraisal smoothing: some qualitative and quantitative evidence”, Journal of Property Research, 20(3):261-280.
    45. Miles, M., D Guilkey, B Webb, and K Hunter, 1991,”An empirical evaluation of the reliability of commercial appraisals”, NCREIF Research Paper, Chicago: National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries.
    46. Pompian, M.M., 2006, Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build optimal portfolios that account for investor biases, John Wiley & Sons Inc: New York.
    47. Quan, D. C., and J. M. Quigley, 1991, “Price Formation and the Appraisal Function in Real Estate Markets”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4: 127-146.
    48. Ramsett, D., 1999, “Yield capitalization for market analysis”, The Appraisal Journal, 67(4):398-403
    49. Ross, S., and R. Zisler, 1987, “Managing Real Estate Portfolio, Part 3: A Close look at Equity Real Estate Risk”, Goldman Sachs Real Estate Research.
    50. Yiu, C. Y., B. S. Tang, Y. H. Chiang, and L. H. Choy, 2006, “Alternative Theories of Appraisal Bias”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 14(3):321-344.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    96257003
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096257003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700301.pdf202KbAdobe PDF21032View/Open
    700302.pdf159KbAdobe PDF21414View/Open
    700303.pdf221KbAdobe PDF21246View/Open
    700304.pdf277KbAdobe PDF21101View/Open
    700305.pdf311KbAdobe PDF21447View/Open
    700306.pdf404KbAdobe PDF21342View/Open
    700307.pdf499KbAdobe PDF21784View/Open
    700308.pdf429KbAdobe PDF24534View/Open
    700309.pdf267KbAdobe PDF21500View/Open
    700310.pdf284KbAdobe PDF21410View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback