Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38737
|
| Title: | 台灣西方翻譯文學作品之引用研究
Citation Analysis of Taiwan Translational Literature |
| Authors: | 李青親 |
| Contributors: | 蔡明月
李青親 |
| Keywords: | 翻譯文學
西方外國文學
引用文獻分析
跨科際整合研究
translational literature
Western literature
Citation Analysis
Interdisciplinary research |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-04-09 15:32:58 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 引用文獻分析法可觀察學科研究特性與歷程、未來發展趨勢、學科與跨學科關係，並建構知識地圖，但較少被應用在人文學領域的研究。而文學作品包含著豐富意涵，具有多種探討面向，正可藉引用文獻分析法來觀察其被引用的情形，而發現其多元內涵。本研究透過引用文獻分析法，以1950至2008年間台灣高度翻譯的西方外國文學作品為對象，觀察其在國外被引用的次數，以及年代、語言、主題分佈情形，以了解文學作品在台灣被翻譯次數與在國外被引用次數之差異與相關性、在不同年代、語言、主題領域中的不同影響性，以及被研究與引用的分佈情形。
研究結果如下：1.西方外國文學作品被引用次數概況：(1)整體而言，文學作品被翻譯次數與被引用次數相關程度為低度正相關；(2)西班牙文學分區之作品與莎士比亞的作品在台灣被翻譯次數與在國外被引用次數皆成高度正相關；(3)被引用次數前三名的文學分區為英國、古代西洋、法國文學；(4)被引用次數前三名的文學作品為《伊里亞德》、《奧德賽》、《神曲》。2.被引用之年代分佈情形：(1) 各文學分區最高被引年代多集中在1990年代；(2) 各年代區段皆以英國文學分區被引次數最高；(3) 1970、1980與1990三個年代區段皆以《伊里亞德》被引次數最高。3.被引用之語言分佈情形：(1) 各文學分區皆被引用在英語文章中最多；(2) 各語言文章中所高度引用的文學分區與文學作品多與該地區所使用之語言相符。4.被引用之主題分佈情形：(1) 各文學分區除了古代西洋文學，皆被引用在文學主題領域文章中最多；(2) 各主題文章所高度引用之文學作品多屬古代西洋、英國、義大利、法國與德國文學作品。
本研究結果可應用於圖書資訊界在規劃館藏發展、進行參考服務及舉辦閱讀推廣活動時之參考。外文學門研究者可藉由不同文學分區之文學作品被引用的多寡與分佈情形，觀察各文學分區與文學作品被研究的狀況與範圍，進一步探討學術研究與發展史、觀察文學作品在不同語言國家與主題領域的影響力，並發現跨科際整合研究的契機，探掘文學作品更多元深沉的內涵。
Citation Analysis reveals research characteristics, research development, scholarly communication, and helps to construct knowledge map. However, little research devoted to the cited situation of humanity discipline. This study aims to investigate how literary works were cited. Through Citation Index, the Western literary works highly translated in Taiwan during 1950 and 2008 were examined in terms of their cited times and cited distribution in foreign papers.
The findings are as follows. Correlational analysis of translated times of Western literary works in Taiwan and cited times of which in foreign research was lowly positive. Nevertheless, the translated times of Spanish literature in Taiwan and cited times of which in foreign research were highly positive correlated, and also the case in Shakespeare’s works. English literature was the most highly cited literary division in five year period, and Iliad was the most highly cited work in 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. In all literary divisions, more than half of the citing papers were in English. On the whole, the language of citing papers corresponded to the language of their highly citing literary division and works. Except for Classical literature, all literary divisions were highly cited by papers of literature subject area. In different subject areas, most highly cited works belonged to Classical literature, English literature, Italian literature, French literature, and German literature.
The results of the study may assist in Collection Development, Reference, and reading promotion. On the other hand, foreign literature researchers can further observe research progress, review literary theory, and proceed interdisciplinary research to explore the abundant and diverse connotation of literary works. |
| Reference: | 西文：
1. Ariely, D. “Combining Experiences Over Time: The Effects of Duration, Intensity Changes and On-Line Measurements on Retrospective Pain Evaluations.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11:1 (1998): 19-45.
2. Arora, SL. “ ‘To the Grave with Dead’: Ambivalence in a Spanish Proverb.” Fabula 21:3/4(1980): 223-246.
3. Avia, MD. “Personality and Positive Emotions.” European Journal of Personality 11:1(1997):33-56.
4. Bailey, JE. “Asklepios: Ancient Hero of Medical Caring.” Annals of Internal Medicine 124:2 (1996): 257-263.
5. Brooks, Terrence A. “Evidence of Complex Citer Motivations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37:1(January 1986):34-36.
6. Budd, John. “A Citation Study of American Literature: Implications for Collection Management.” Colleciton Management 8:2(Summer 1986): 49-62.
7. Bywaters, EG.“The Cheshire Cat Syndrome.”Postgraduate Medical Journal 44:507 (1968): 19-22.
8. Choi, Jin M. “Citation Analysis of Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication Patterns of Anthropology in the U.S.A.” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 6:3/4(1998):65-84.
9. Cody, LF. “Sex, Civility, and the Self: Du Coudray, d`Eon, and Eighteenth-Century Conceptions of Gendered, National, and Psychological Identity.” French Historical Studies 24:3 (2001):379-407.
10. Cullars, John. “Citation Characteristics of French and German Literary Monographs.” Library Quarterly 59:4(1986): 305-325.
11. Cullars, John. “Citation Characteristics of Italian and Spanish Literary Monographs.” Library Quarterly 60:4(1990): 337-356.
12. Curtis, RC. “Robbing a Man of his Illusions: Response to Herbert Fensterheim and Stanley Messer.” Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 9:2 (1999): 157-159.
13. Dixon, DP, and JP Jones. “For a Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Scientific Geography.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86:4 (1996): 767-779.
14. Doherty, JJ. “The Academic Librarian and the Hegemony of the Canon.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 24:5 (1998):403-406.
15. Edmondson, HT.“Teaching Administrative Ethics with Help from Jefferson.” PS, Political Science& Politics 28:2 (1995):226-229.
16. Fitzgibbons, Shirley A. “Citation Analysis in the Social Sciences,” in Collection Development in Libraries: A Treatise(Part B). ed. Robert D. Stueart and George B. Miller (Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press Inc., 1980), 291-331.
17. Fleming, P, and G Sewell. “Looking for the Good Soldier, Svejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace.” Sociology 36:4 (2002):857-873.
18. Fost, JW. “Toward the Glass Bead Game: A Rhetorical Invention (Artist`s Statement).” Leonardo 37:3 (2004):191.
19. Friedler, EZ. “Essay: Shakespeare`s Contribution to the Teaching of Comparative Law - Some Reflections on The Merchant of Venice.” Louisiana Law Review 60:4(2000):1087-1102.
20. Frost, Carolyn O. “The Use of Citation in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions.” Library Quarterly 49:4(1979): 399-414.
21. Garfield, E. “Random Thoughts on Citationology. Its Theory and Practice.” Scientometrics 43:1(September 1998):69-76.
22. Garfield, E. “Can Citation Indexing Be Automated?” In Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation(NBS Misc. Pub. 269), ed. Mary E. Stevens, et. al.(Washington D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1965), p.89.
23. Garrett, J. “Missing Eco: On Reading The Name of The Rose as Library Criticism.” Library Quarterly 61:4 (1991):373-388.
24. Ginsburg, RB.“A Plea for Legislative Review.” Southern California Law Review 60:4 (1987): 995-1017.
Hayward, ML, and JE Taylor. “A Schizophrenic Patient Describes the Action of Intensive Psychotherapy.” Psychiatric Quarterly 30:2 (1956):211-248.
25. Heald, PJ. “Medea and the Un-man Literary Guidance in the Determination of Heinousness Under Maynard v. Cartwright.” Texas Law Review 73:3 (1995):571-595.
26. Heinzkill, Richard. “Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals.” Library Quarterly 50:3(1980):352-365.
27. Heinzkill, Richard. “References in Scholarly English and American Literary Journals Thirty Years Later: A Citation Study.” College& Research Libraries 68:2(2007):141-153.
28. Herubel, Jean-Pierre V. M. and Anne L. Buchanan. “Citation Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Selective and Annotated Bibliography.” Collection Management, 18:3/4(1994):89-137.
29. Jacobs, JB, and EH Steele. “Sexual Deprivation and Penal Policy.” Cornell Law Review 62:2 (1977):289-312.
30. Jacobs, Li. “Cognitive Therapy of Postmanic and Postdepressive Dysphoria in Bipolar Illness.” American Journal of Psychotherapy 36:4 (1982): 450-458.
31. Kiser, S. “An Existential Case Study of Madness: Encounters with Divine Affliction.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 44:4 (2004): 431-454.
32. Kortenkamp, KV, and CF Moore.“Children`s Moral Evaluations of Ecological Damage: The Effect of Biocentric and Anthropocentric Intentions.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39:8 (2009): 1785-1806.
33. Landis, ML. “Fate, Responsibility, and ‘Natural’ Disaster Relief: Narrating the American Welfare State.” Law & Society Review 33:2 (1999):257-318.
34. Lane, DC, and R Oliva. “The Greater Whole: Towards a Synthesis of System Dynamics and Soft Systems Methodology.” European Journal of Operational Research 107:1 (1998): 214-235.
35. Leubsdorf, J.“The Structure of Judicial Opinions.”Minnesota Law Review 86:2 (2001):447-496.
Litowitz, DE.“Franz Kafka`s Outsider Jurisprudence.” Law and Social Inquiry 27:1 (2002): 103-137.
36. Liu, Mengxiong. “Progress in Documentation. The Complexities of Citation Practice: A Review of Citation Studies,” Journal of Documentation 49:4(December 1993):370-408.
37. MacRoberts, Michael H. and Barbara R. MacRoberts. “Problems of Citation Analysis: A Critical Review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:5(September 1989): 342-349.
38. Markel, D. “Wrong Turns on the Road to Alternative Sanctions: Reflections on the Future of Shaming Punishments and Restorative Justice.” Texas Law Review 85:6(2007): 1385-1412.
39. Max, B. “Chocolate Addiction, the Dual Pharmacogenetics of Asparagus Eaters, and the Arithmetic of Freedom.” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 10:10 (1989): 390-392.
40. McLellan, MF. “Literature and Medicine: Some Major Works.”Lancet 348(1996):1014-1016.
41. Miller, AS.“ Privacy in Modern Corporate State: A Speculartive Essay.” Administrative Law Review 25:3 (1973):231-264.
42. Nehf, JP.“Recognizing the Societal Value in Information Privacy.” Washington Law Review 78:1 (2003):1-91.
43. Nicolaisen, Jeppe. “Citation Analysis,” in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol.41, ed. Cronin, Blaise (Washington: American Society for Information Science, 2007), 609-641.
44. Norris, C. “Music Theory, Analysis and Deconstruction: How They Might (Just) Get Along Together.” International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 36:1 (2005):37-82.
45. Osareh, Farideh. “Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature I.” Libri 46(1996):149-158.
46. Peritz, B. C. “On the Objectives of Citation Analysis: Problems of Theory and Method.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43:6(July 1992): 448-451.
47. Radford, GP. “Positivism, Foucault, and the Fantasia of the Library- Conceptions of Knowledge and the Modern Library Experience.” Library Quarterly 62:4 (1992):408-424.
48. Radford, GP. “Flaubert, Foucault, and the Bibliotheque Fantastique: Toward a Postmodern Epistemology for Library Science.” Library Trends 46:4 (1998):616-634.
49. Radford, GP, and ML Radford. “Libraries, Librarians, and the Discourse of Fear.” Library Quarterly 71:3 (2001):299-329.
50. Rescher, N. “Quixotic Skepticism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 30:2 (1993):183-184.
51. Rosengarten, R. “An Impossible Love: Subjection and Embodiment in Paula Rego`s Possession.” Art History 30:1 (2007): 83-103.
52. Russell, LM. “Inclusive Language and Power.” Religious Education 80:4(1985): 582-602.
53. Shotter, J. “`Real Presences`: Meaning as Living Movement in a Participatory World.” Theory & Psychology 13:4 (2003): 435-468.
54. Smith, HW.“Salt and Water Volume Receptors- An Exercise in Physiologic Apologetics.” American Journal of Medicine 23:4 (1957):623-652.
55. Smith, Linda C. “Citation Analysis.” Library Trends 30(Summer 1981):83-106.
56. Snyder, Herbert, Blaise Cronin, and Elisabeth Davenport. “What’s the use of citation? Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences.” Journal of Information Science 21:2(1995): 75-85.
57. Solove, DJ.“Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy.” Standford Law Review 53:6 (2001): 1393-1462.
58. SPSS. “About SPSS.” <http://www.spss.com/corpinfo/?source=homepage&hpzone=nav_bar>. (10 January, 2010)
59. Stevens, JP. “The Shakespeare Canon of Statutory Construction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140:4(1992):1373-1387.
60. Sweetland, J. H. “Errors in Bibliographic Citations: A Continuing Problem.” Library Quarterly 59:4(1989): 291-304.
61. Thompson, Jennifer Wolfe. “The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary scholarship,” Libri 52(2002): 121-136.
62. Thomson Reuters. “A&HCI Scope Notes.” <http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/scope/scope_ahci/#BI> ( 3 December 2009)
63. Thomson Reuters. “Web of Science.” <http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/scientific/Web_of_Science#what_s_included>(3 December 2009).
64. Vandenberg, B. “Is Epistemology Enough?-- An Existential Consideration of Development.” American Psychologist 46:1 (1991): 1278-1286.
65. Williams, C. “Psychology and Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.” Australian Psychologist 20:1 (1985):5-19.
66. Wurmser, L. “Flight from Conscience: Experiences with the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Compulsive Drug-Abusers—Part Two: Dynamic and Therapeutic Conclusions from the Experiences with Psychoanalysis of Drug Users.” Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 4(1987): 169-179.
中文：
1. 方美芬。1979-2002年中國大陸閩粵地區發表台灣文學論文文獻計量分析。東吳大學中國文學系，碩士論文，民93年。
2. 全國學術電子資訊資源共享聯盟。「Web of Science簡介」。2008年11月14日。<http://www.stpi.org.tw/fdb/wos/index.html> (2008年11月14日)。
3. 米樂。「跨越邊界：翻譯理論」。在第三屆美國文學與思想研討會論文選集：文學篇，單德興主編(台北：中央研究院美國文化研究所，民82)，頁1-27。
4. 何光國。文獻計量學導論。台北：三民，民83年。
5. 余匡復。德國文學史。台北：志一，民85年。
6. 周文萍。英語戲劇在台灣：一九四九年至一九九四年。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所，碩士論文，民84年。
7. 李少維。台灣地區宋代理學學位論文引用文獻分析與特性研究：一九五八至一九九六年。中國文化大學史學研究所，碩士論文，民87年。
8. 李惠珍。美國小說在台灣的翻譯史：一九四九至一九七九。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所，碩士論文，民84年。
9. 邱均平。文獻計量學。北京：科學技術文獻，1988年。
10. 高幸玉。日本小說在台灣的翻譯史：一九四九至二00二。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所碩士論文，民93年。
11. 崔燕慧。台灣地區近五年文史哲期刊論文引用文獻分析。輔仁大學圖書館資訊學研究所，碩士論文，民87年。
12. 梁銘心。「Web of Science引文資料庫期刊篩選機制」。在兩岸學術期刊評鑑暨出版產業發展學術研討會論文集，台北，民97年6月23-24日，淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系教育資料與圖書館學季刊編委會編，頁6-1—6-2。台北：編者，民97年。
13. 陳光華。引文索引之建置與應用。台北：文華圖書館管理，民95年。
14. 陳世芳。德語文學在台灣的中譯本：一九五一至二000年。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所，碩士論文，民90年。
15. 陳靖奇。「史坦貝克小說憤怒的葡萄中的社會觀」。在美國文學與思想研討會論文集，台北：民73年11月25-27日，中央研究院美國文化研究所編，頁215-232。台北，編者，民73年。
16. 葉協杰、蔡麗珠、邸銘。「我國近年引文分析研究論文的計量分析」。現代情報2期(2006年2月)：130-132。
17. 董蕙茹。台灣地區的世界文學作品：書目計量分析。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，碩士論文，民96年。
18. 張靜二。西洋文學在台灣研究書目1946年-2000年。台北市：國科會，民93年。
19. 張琰。說了又說的故事—十九世紀英國小說中譯本在台灣(一九四九—一九九四)。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所，碩士論文，民85年。
20. 蔡明月。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北：國立編譯館，民92年。
21. 蔡禎昌。中國近世翻譯文學之研究。中國文化學院中國文學研究所，碩士論文，民60年。
22. 賴永祥編定。中國圖書分類法。台北：文華，民90年。
23. 賴慈芸。飄洋過海的謬思：美國詩作在台灣的翻譯史：一九四五至一九九二。輔仁大學翻譯學研究所，碩士論文，民84年。
24. 鍾芝美。德國文學在台灣。輔仁大學德國語文學系，碩士論文，民74年。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
96155013
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096155013 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 501301.pdf | | 2774Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1885 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
