Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49450
|
| Title: | 領導者才能對決策品質、團隊競爭力、與績效之影響－以Sternberg之WICS模式為例
The effect of leaders’ skills on the quality of leaders’ decisions, team competitiveness and performance – Sternberg’s WICS model |
| Authors: | 陳力睿 |
| Contributors: | 張裕隆
陳力睿 |
| Keywords: | WICS模式
領導者智慧
領導者實用智力
領導者分析智力
領導者創新能力
領導者決策品質
團隊競爭力
團隊績效
WICS model
leaders’ wisdom
leaders’ practical intelligence
leaders’ analytic intelligence
leaders’ creativity
quality of leaders’ decision
team competitiveness
team performance |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 11:44:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 領導者之決策對於組織的影響甚大，不僅決定企業的獲利，更可能影響組織的存亡。在現今快速變遷的環境中，領導者經常面臨在時間壓力下需快速做出正確的決策，因此本研究著重於探討領導者才能對於領導者決策品質，以及團隊競爭力與績效之影響。具體而言，本研究從Sternberg所提出的WICS模式為出發點，探討「領導者智慧」、「領導者實用智力」、「領導者分析智力」及「領導者創新能力」對於「領導者決策品質」、「團隊競爭力與績效」之影響，並建構「領導者才能之競爭力模式」。至於領導者才能之競爭力模式，不僅可以做為後續相關研究之重要參考，亦可協助企業與領導者檢視其領導效能，進而做為改善競爭力與績效之重要依據。
本研究之問卷經嚴謹之程序編製，首先進行專家會議、信效度及因素分析之檢驗，之後再進行研究變項間之探討。研究樣本採立意取樣方式，以團隊為單位，每個團隊收集團隊領導者及其五位直屬部屬之調查問卷。本研究總計回收40位領導者與200位部屬之有效樣本，統計分析結果顯示，本研究所有量表皆具有良好之內部一致性信度（.754~.972）與效標關聯效度（.280~.820）。
此外，本研究根據結構方程模式驗證本研究之假設，綜合結果顯示：1. 領導者智慧、實用智力、分析智力及創新能力對於領導者決策品質具有顯著且正向之影響；2. 領導者決策品質對於團隊競爭力具有顯著且正向之影響；3. 團隊競爭力對於團隊績效具有顯著且正向之影響；4. 「領導者才能之競爭力模式」獲得實證支持。最後，研究者根據本研究結果，提出對未來學術研究與實務應用具體之建議。
Leaders’ decisions have a great impact on organizations; they influence not only the revenue but also the survival of organizations. In this fast-changing environment, leaders always need to make fast and correct decisions under time pressure. Therefore, the focus of this study is the effect of leaders’ skills on the quality of leaders’ decisions so as to improve the competitiveness and performance of teams or organizations. The present study starts from WICS model which developed by Sternberg to examine the effect of leaders’ wisdom, practical intelligence, analytic intelligence, and creativity on the quality of leaders’ decisions, team competitiveness and performance, and to construct the competitiveness model of leaders’ skills. The development of competitiveness model of leaders’ skills could not only be used by following related studies, but also assist organizations and leaders to review leadership efficacy in order to improve the competitiveness and performance.
The present study constructed the questionnaire through an expert committee, tests of reliability, validity, and factor analysis. The samples of team unit were collected using purposive sampling, and each unit included one leader and five immediate subordinates. A total of forty valid sample units which had forty leaders and two hundred immediate subordinates were collected. Through the statistical analysis, it shows the internal consistency reliability (.752-.972) and criterion-related validity (.280-.820) of all scales (leaders’ self-rating and subordinates’ other-rating) were excellent.
Furthermore, according to the result of hypothesis testing and Structural Equation Modeling analysis, it shows: 1. Leaders’ wisdom, empirical intelligence, analytic intelligence, and creativity have a significant and positive influence on the quality of leaders’ decisions; 2. The quality of leaders’ decisions has a significant and positive influence on team competitiveness; 3. Team competitiveness has a significant and positive influence on team performance; 4. The constructed competitiveness model of leaders’ skills was supported. Finally, suggestions were proposed for further academic studies and practical application based on the result of the present study. |
| Reference: | 毛治國、鄭琇君（2009）。管理決策概念架構之回顧與建議。管理與系統，16(2)，131-155。
王建忠（2001）。團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果。國立臺灣大學理學院心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
司徒達賢（2001）。策略管理新論。台北：智勝文化
司徒達賢（2007）。管理學的新世界。台北：天下文化
白崇亮（1991）。策略決策特性、競爭優勢策略與經營績效的關係－台灣電子資訊業之實證研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文，未出版。
吳雅倩（2009）。領導才能、組織文化、目標設定、組織效能感、與競爭力、績效之相關研究。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
宋秋儀（譯）（2006）。Yukl, G.(2002)著。組織領導學（Leadership in organization 5e）。台北市：華泰文化
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論技術與應用。台北市：雙葉書廊
林邦傑、陳美娟（2006）。學校組織與教職人員心理契約量表的建構。教育研究與發展期刊，2(4)，39-68。
林家五、熊欣華、黃國隆（2006）。認同對決策嵌陷行為的影響：個體與群體層次的分析。台灣管理學刊，6(1)，157-180。
施振榮（2007）。宏碁的世紀變革：淡出製造，成就品牌。台北市：天下文化
徐家偉（2007）。組織轉型能力之建構與評鑑工具之發展。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
徐維秉（2009）。企業因應中國勞動合同法之變革策略及其對心理契約、組織承諾、核心競爭力、與組織績效之影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
張裕隆（2001）。管理才能測驗發展及信效度分析。應用心理研究：10，65-95。
張裕隆（2004）。個人與組織「競爭力」及個人「年薪」與「EPS」相關之研究。
論文發表於台灣心理學會第四十三屆年會之「組織績效與競爭力提升」研討會。台北市。
張裕隆（2005a）。組織、個人「競爭力」與組織獲利、個人財富之相關研究。國家文官培訓所—T&D飛訊：30，1-18。
張裕隆（2005b）。「標竿」與「一般」、「虧損」、「政府」組織競爭力之比較分析研究。國家文官培訓所—T&D飛訊：33，1-13。
張裕隆（2006）。ISO10015與培訓價值創新。中華人力資源管理年鑑，131。
莊敦閔（2009）。從學習型組織、文化、與領導，探討個人學習與組織訓練對績效、競爭力之影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
陳彰儀（1999）。組織心理學。台北：心理出版社
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
黃敏萍、鄭伯壎、王建忠（2003）。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能：I-P-O模式之驗證。管理學報，20(3)，397-427。
齊若蘭（譯）（2004a）。Peter Drucker (1954)著。彼得．杜拉克的管理聖經。台北：遠流出版社
齊若蘭（譯）（2004b）。Jim Collins (2001)著。從A到A+。台北：遠流出版社
楊國樞、鄭伯壎（1989）。傳統價值觀、個人現代性及組織行為：後儒家假說的一項微觀驗證。中央研究院民族學研究所刊集，64，1-49。
鄧熙華（2009）。領導才能、組織使命、人力資源政策與運作、組織文化、與組織競爭力、績效之相關研究。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
鄭伯壎（2005）。華人領導－領論與實際。台北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司
顧淑馨（譯）（2004）。Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1994)著。競爭大未來。台北市：智庫
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122-136.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E.(1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirement. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human performance, 10, 331-360.
Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80(2), 97-125.
Dean Jr, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 368-396.
Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 389-402.
Eisenhardt, K. M. and M. J. Zbaracki (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17-37.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West.
Fox, S., & Dinur, Y. (1988). Vality of self-assessment: Afield evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 581-592.
Fredrickson, J. W. (1985). Effects of decision motive and organizational performance level on strategic decision processes. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 821-843.
Frisch, D., & Clemen, R. T. (1994). Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 46-54.
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30, 471-491.
Hedlund, J., Forsythe, G. B., Horvath, J. A., Williams, W. M., Snook, S., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(2), 117-140.
Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 353-370.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership? American Psychologist, 49(6), 493.
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169-180.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352.
Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47-71.
Javidan, M. (1998). Core competence: What does it mean in practice? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60-71.
Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training & Development Journal, 44(11), 79.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36-51.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251.
Kaiser, R. B., Hogan, R., & Craig, S. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. The American psychologist, 63(2), 96-110.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74, 75-85.
Katzenback, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. New York: Happer Collins.
Lowe, K. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Ten years of the leadership quarterly: Contributions and challenges for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 459-514.
Luthans, F., Hodgetts R. M., & Rosenkrantz S. A. (1988). Real managers. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "Intelligence.". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14.
McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Boal, K. B. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 177-190.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mintzberg, M., Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 246-275.
Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology applied to work. CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.
Papadakis, V. M., Lioukas, S., & Chambers, D. (1998). Strategic decision-making processes : The role of management and context. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 115-147.
Parker, G. H. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79-91.
Schoner, B., Rose, G. L., & Hoyt, G. C. (1974). Quality of decisions: Individuals versus real and synthetic groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(4), 424-432.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil`s advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71.
Semadar, A., Robins, G., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). Comparing the validity of multiple social effectiveness constructs in the prediction of managerial job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 443-461.
Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organization. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
Spencer, M. L. & Spencer, M. S. (1993). Competence at Work: Model for superior performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Spreitzer, G. M., McCall, M. W., & Mahoney, J. D. (1997). Early identification of international executive potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 6-29.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607-627.
Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, C., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: a case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29, 401-418.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365.
Sternberg, R. J., & Hedlund, J. (2002). Practical intelligence, g, and work psychology, Human Performance, 15, 143-160.
Sternberg, R. J., & Vroom, V. (2002). The person versus the situation in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 301-323.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003a). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. UK: Cambridge University .
Sternberg, R. J. (2003b). WICS: A model of leadership in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 386-401.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28, 37-44.
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). A systems model of leadership: WICS. American Psychologist, 62(1), 34-42.
Stogdill(1974). Handbook of leadership: a survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
Thornton, G. C. III & Byham, W. C. (1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. New York: Academic Press.
Tilles, S. (1963). How to evaluate corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 41, 111-121.
Tjosvold, D. (1988). Cooperative and competitive interdependence collaboration between departments to serve customers. Group & Organization Studies (1986-1998), 13(3), 274.
Vinokur, A., Burnstein, E., Sechrest, L., & Wortman, P. M. (1985). Group decision making by experts: Field study of panels evaluating medical technologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 70-84.
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1978). On the Validity of the Vroom-Yetton Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 151-162.
Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 436-458. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
96752014
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0967520141 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [心理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 014101.pdf | 859Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2469 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
