English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47923491      Online Users : 985
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/50766
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50766


    Title: 產品專案創新類型與新產品開發關鍵成功因素及其管理之個案研究
    Product project innovative types and critical success factors of new product development case study
    Authors: 林冠亨
    Contributors: 王文英
    林冠亨
    Keywords: 新產品開發
    目標成本制
    產品專案創新類型
    專案績效
    New product development
    Target costing
    Product project innovative type
    Project performance
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-09-29 16:38:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討新產品開發關鍵成功因素與其管理方式,以及產品專案創新類型如何影響新產品開發關鍵成功因素之重要性,並辨別在不同產品專案創新類型下可提升新產品開發專案績效之關鍵成功因素。本研究以國內某汽車製造公司為個案研究對象,並透過問卷調查與統計分析之結果提出以下四項結論:
    一、新產品開發關鍵成功因素構面包含供應商、技術母廠、經銷商、高階主管與跨功能團隊、新產品開發管理、績效評估與獎酬等六大構面。於新產品開發過程中,企業針對各構面設有相關的管理作法。
    二、新產品開發關鍵成功因素之重要性會受產品專案創新類型不同而有所差異。
    三、在大改專案下,高階主管與跨功能團隊構面、新產品開發管理構面、績效評估與獎酬構面對新產品開發專案績效構面有顯著正向影響。
    四、在小改專案下,供應商構面、高階主管與跨功能團隊構面、績效評估與獎酬構面對新產品開發專案績效構面有顯著正向影響。
    The study focuses on several topics: critical success factors of new product development, product project innovative type’s influence on relative importance of critical success factors, identification of critical success factors which improve project performance in different product project innovative types. The study applies case study based on one motor manufacturing company, questionnaire, and statistical analysis. The results are as follows:
    1. Critical success factors of new product development include supplier dimension, technical parent company dimension, distributor dimension, upper management and cross functional team dimension, new product development management dimension, performance appraisal and reward dimension. During the project time, the company establishes proper management regarding various dimensions.
    2. The importance level of critical success factors is influenced by product project innovative types.
    3. Under big projects, three dimensions which include upper management and cross functional team dimension, new product development management dimension, performance appraisal and reward dimension, have positive impact on project performance dimension.
    4. Under small projects, three dimensions which include supplier dimension, upper management and cross functional team dimension, performance appraisal and reward dimension, have positive impact on project performance dimension.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王文英,1998,日式成本管理利器—豐田式成本企劃之源起及特色,會計研究月刊,第154期(9月):85-90。
    王文英,2007,策略與目標成本制關係之探索性研究-透過國內兩企業之比較個案,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:203-248。
    加登豊,1993,成本規劃—戰略性成本管理,陳文光譯。台北:臺華工商圖書出版公司。
    陳葦憓,2002,目標成本制關鍵成功因素之探討—以國內製造業為研究對象,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    楊清溪與廖益興,1999,目標成本制度實施問題與改革方法之實證研究—以國瑞汽車公司為例,管理會計,第50期(10月):16-35。
    英文文獻
    Ancona, D. G., and D. F. Caldwell. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3(August): 321-341.
    Ansari, S., J. Bell, and D. Swenson. 2006. A template for implementing target costing. Journal of Cost Management 20(September-October): 20-27.
    Belout, A., and C. Gauvreau. 2004. Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management. International Journal of Project Management 22(1): 1-11.
    Bonner, J. M., R. W. Ruekert, and O. C. Walker. 2002. Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(May): 233-245.
    Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1990. The power of product integrity. Harvard Business Review 68(November-December): 107-118.
    Clark, K.B., and S.C. Wheelwright. 1992. Managing New Product and Process Development. New York: The Free Press.
    Cooper, R. G. 1990. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons 33(May-June): 44-54.
    Cooper, R. G., and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 1995. Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12(November): 374-391.
    Cooper, R. G., and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 1996. Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. Research Technology Development 39(4): 18-29.
    Cooper, R., and R. Slagmulder. 1999. Development profitable new products with target costing. Sloan Management Review 40(Summer): 23-33.
    Denison, D. R., S. L. Hart, and J. A. Kahn. 1996. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal 39(4): 1005–1023.
    Ernst, H. 2002. Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Review 4(1): 1-40
    Evert, G. 2000. Qualitative Methods in Management Research. Sage Publications.
    Gagne, M., and R. Discenza. 1995. Target costing. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 10(1): 16-22.
    Griffin, A., and A. L. Page. 1993. An interim report on measuring product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(September): 291-308.
    Griffin, A., and A. L. Page. 1996. PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(November): 478-496.
    Harmsen, H., K. G. Grunert, and K. Bove. 2000. Company Competencies as a network: The role of product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17(May): 194-207.
    Holahan, P. J., and S. K. Markham. 1996. Factors affecting multifunctional team effectiveness. In The PDMA Handbook of New Product development, edited by M. D. Rosenau, A. Griffin, G. A. Castellion, and N. F. Anschuetz. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 455-461.
    Holland, S., K. Gaston, and J. Gomes. 2000. Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews 2(3): 231-259.
    Hultink, E. J., and H. S. J. Robben. 1995. Measuring new product success: The difference that time perspective makes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12(November): 392-405.
    Lawson, B., K. J. Petersen, P. D. Cousins, and R. B. Handfield. 2009. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(March): 156-172.
    Loch, C., L. Stein, and C. Terwiesch. 1996. Measuring development performance in the electronics industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(January): 3-20.
    Montoya-Weiss, M. M., and R. Calantone. 1994. Determinants of new product performance: A review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11(November): 397-417.
    Nakata, C., and S. Im. 2010. Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: A group effectiveness perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(July): 554-571.
    Olson, E. M., O. C. Walker, and R. W. Ruekert. 1995. Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing 59(January): 48-62.
    Page, A. L. 1993. Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(September): 273-290.
    Ragatz , G. L., R. B. Handfield, and T. V. Scannell. 1997. Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(May): 190-202.
    Rauniar, R., W. Doll, G. Rawski, and P. Hong. 2008. The role of heavyweight product manager in new product development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 28(2): 130-154.
    Salomo, S., J. Weise, and H.G. Gemunden. 2007. NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24(July): 285-302.
    Shaw, D. G., and C. E. Schneier. 1995. Team measurement and rewards: How some companies are getting it right. Human Resource Planning 18(3): 34-49.
    Song, M., T. Kawakami, and A. Stringfellow. 2010. A cross-national comparative study of senior management policy, marketing-manufacturing involvement, and innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(March): 179-200.
    Song, M., and J. Thieme. 2009. The role of suppliers in market intelligence gathering for radical and incremental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(January): 43-57.
    Song, X. M. and M. M. Montoya-Weiss. 1998. Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(March): 124-135.
    Song, X. M., M. M. Montoya-Weiss, and J. B. Schmidt. 1997. Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(January): 35–47.
    Song, X. M., and M. E. Parry. 1997. The determinants of Japanese new product successes. Journal of Marketing Research 34(February): 64-76.
    Swink, M. 2000. Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17(May): 208-220.
    Tani, T., H. Okano, N. Shimizu, Y. Iwabuchi, J. Fukuda, and S. Cooray. 1994. Target cost management in Japanese companies: Current state of the art. Management Accounting Research 5(1): 67-82.
    Tessarolo, P. 2007. Is integration enough for fast product development? An empirical investigation of the contextual effects of product vision. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24(January): 69-82.
    The CAM-I Target Cost Core Group. 1997. Target Costing: The Next Frontier in Strategic Cost Management. Chicago: Irwin Professional Pub.
    Thieme, R. J., X. M. Song, and G. Shin. 2003. Project management characteristics and new product survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(March): 104–119.
    Tyagi, R. K., and M. S. Sawhney. 2010. High-performance product management: The impact of structure, process, competencies, and role definition. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27(January): 83-96.
    Veryzer, R. W. 1998. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15(July): 304-321.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    97353001
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353001
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback