政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51271

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/51271

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 112704/143671 (78%)
造访人次 : 49721972 在线人数 : 725

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/51271

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51271

题名:	展延心靈觀 On the extended mind
作者:	唐孝儀 Tang, Hsiao Yi
贡献者:	林從一唐孝儀 Tang, Hsiao Yi
关键词:	展延心靈觀外在論主動外在論動態系統同等原則鷹架理論 the extended mind externalism active externalism dynamic system parity principle scaffolding theory
日期:	2010
上传时间:	2011-10-05 14:35:53 (UTC+8)
摘要:	心靈範圍在哪裡？以往我們討論心靈議題時，不外乎都是將心靈視為存在於體表之內的一種實體、一種器官或是一種功能，例如：靈魂、大腦、又或者是指包含大腦與所有在體表之內的神經系統。但是，Andy Clark與David Chalmers告訴我們在某些情況下，心靈是可以超越體表而存在的，心靈的界限不是我們的體表；這個立場被我們稱為「外在論」或是「展延心靈觀」。對照於Clark與Chalmers的立場，以往將體表視為心靈界限的立場就被統稱為「內在論」。　　本篇論文以Clark與Chalmers於1998年發表的文章“The Extended Mind”為主，透過介紹展延心靈觀的發展背景聚焦於展延心靈觀的主要論點，並且根據Frederick Adams與Kenneth Aizawa對展延心靈觀的批評及Clark、Richard Menary等人所提出的回應讓我們對於展延心靈觀有更深入的討論與理解。最後，由Clark與Chalmers所提到的「社會性的展延心靈（socially extended mind）」回到語言與心靈的討論，透過Clark曾多次在文章與著作中提到俄國語言及心理學家Lev Semenovich Vygotsky的語言理論，試圖連結Clark與Chalmers的主動外在論與Putnam和Burge的傳統外在論，並且進一步地思考展延心靈觀發展性。
參考文獻:	Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2007/2010) “Defending the Bounds of Cognition,” in M. Richard (ed.) The Extended Mind, MIT Press. Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2009) “Why the Mind Is Still in the Head,” in R. Philip and Murat Aydede (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Cambridge Press. Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2008) The Bounds of Cognition, Wiley-Blackwell. Burge, T. (1979) ‘From “Individualism and the Mental”,’ in P. Andrew and Sanford Goldberg (eds.) The Twin Earth Chronicles, M.E. Sharpe. Carruthers, P. (2004) The Nature of the Mind, Routledge. Clark, A. (2010) “Coupling, Constitution, and the Cognitive Kind: A Reply to Adams and Aizawa,” in M. Richard (ed.) The Extended Mind, MIT Press. Clark, A. (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, Oxford University Press Clark, A. (2007) “Coupling, Emergence and Explanation,” in Schouten, M. and Huibert Looren de Jong (eds.) The Matter of Mind, Blackwell. Clark, A. (2005/2010) “Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind, Extended,” in M. Richard, The Extended Mind, MIT Press Clark, A. (2001) Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Oxford University Press. Clark, A. (1995) “Moving Minds: Situating Content in the Service of Real-Time Success,” Philosophical Perspectives: AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, vol. 9, 89-104. Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998) “The Extended Mind,” Analysis 58, 10-23; reprinted in Clark’s Supersizing the Mind, 220-32 Chalmers, D. (2008) "Foreword," in A. Clark, Supersizing the Mind, Oxford University Press Cole, D. (2009) “The Chinese Room Argument,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/#5.3) Descartes, R. The Philosophical Writing of Descartes [3 vols], J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch and [vol. 3 only] A. Kenny (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984-91), vol. 1: 208. Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy in Essential Squashed Philosophers, ed. Glyn Lloyd-Hughes, (USA: Tomato Press, 2009), http://www.btinternet.com/~glynhughes/squashed/descartes.htm. Flanagan, O. (2009) “Where in the World is the Mind?” New Scientist, 2691, 44-46 Gertler, B. (2007) “Overextending the Mind?” in B. Gertler and L. Shapiro (eds.) Arguing about the Mind, Routledge Giere, R. (2002) “Scientific Cognition as Distributed Cognition,” in Carruthers, P., Stephen Stich and Michael Siegal (eds.) The Cognition Basis of Science, Cambridge University Press. Haugeland, J. (1998) “Mind Embodied and Embedded,” in his Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, Harvard University Press Hurley, S. (1998) “Introduction,” in her Consciousness in Action, Harvard University Press Jacob, P. (2006) “Why Visual Experience Is Likely to Resist Being Enacted,” Psyche 12 (1), 1-12. Kim, J. (2003) Philosophy of mind, Westview Press. Kiverstein, J. and Clark, A. (2009) “Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or many?” Topoi 28, 1-7 Lau, J. and Deutsch, M. (2008) “Externalism and Mental Content,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Levy, N. (2007) “Introduction,” in his Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press. Lycan, W. (1999) “Introduction” in William G. Lycan, Mind and Cognition: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishing. MacKay, D. M. (1991), Behind the Eye, The Gifford Lectures, ed. Valerie MacKay (Oxford: Blackwell) Maslin, K. (2007) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, Polity Press. Menary, R. (2007) Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded, Palgrave Macmillan Menary, R. (2009) “Intentionality, Cognitive Integration and the Continuity Thesis,” Topoi 28, 31-43 Menary, R. (2010) The Extended Mind, MIT Press Murphy, N. and Brown, W. (2007) Did My Neurons Make Me Do It?, Oxford University Press. Noë, A. (2004) Action in Perception, MIT Press Noë, A. (2006) “Experience without the Head,” in T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.) Perceptual Experience, Oxford University Press O’Brien, G. (1998) “The Mind: Embodied, Embedded, but not Extended,” Metascience 7, 78-83 Putnam, H. (1973) “Meaning and Reference,” The Journal of Philosophy LXX, 19 Nov.8, 699-711. Putnam, H. (1975/1996) “The Meaning of Meaning,” in P. Andrew and Sanford Goldberg (eds.) The Twin Earth Chronicles, M.E. Sharpe. Schneider, S. (2009) “ Identity Theory,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Searle, J. (1984) Mind, Brains and Science, Havard Press. Smart, J.J.C. (2007) “The Identity Theory of Mind,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Smart, J.J.C. (1995) “Mind and Brain,” in Chard, W. and Tadeusz Szubka (eds.) The Mind-Body Problem, USA: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Rowlands, M. (2009) “Enactivism and the Extended Mind,” Topoi 28, 53-62 Rowlands, M. (2003) “Vehicle Externalism,” in his Externalism: Putting Mind and World Back Together again, McGill-Queen’s university Press. Rupert, R. (2009) Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind, Oxford University Press. Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1999) The Embodied Mind, The MIT Press. Plato著，王曉朝譯，《柏拉圖全集》卷二，克拉底魯篇(Cratylus)，台北：左岸文化，民92，p.75-76。 Plato著，王曉朝譯，《柏拉圖全集》卷一，美諾篇(Meno)與斐多篇(Pheado)，台北：左岸文化，民92。 Lev Semenovich Vygotsky著，李維譯，《思維與語言》，台北：昭明出版社，民89。方萬全（2004），〈約翰．舍爾論「背景」與實在論〉，《歐美研究》第三十四卷第三期，頁431-456。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學哲學研究所 96154013 99
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096154013
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[哲學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
401301.pdf	944Kb	Adobe PDF2	3218	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈