Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52726
|
| Title: | 情緒、決策情境與社會規範對於支持環保程度之影響
How emotions, decision-making situations and social norms influence the degree of support for environmental protection |
| Authors: | 張鈞皓
Chang, Chun Hao |
| Contributors: | 邱志聖
張鈞皓
Chang, Chun Hao |
| Keywords: | 情緒
決策情境
社會規範
支持環保程度
emotions
decision-making situations
social norms
degree of support for environmental protection |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-04-17 09:10:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 環保這類型的公益議題，其資源並不如一般企業或是營利單位來的充裕，因此我們更應該重視環保議題之廣告支出所能獲得的效益，希望能在有限的廣告預算之下，取得最佳的效果，促成本研究選擇環保議題作為廣告效果探討主軸的想法。
過去Griskevicius等人對於情緒效果的研究，確實指出消費者所帶有的不同情緒確實對於廣告的效果有所影響。而本研究認為，消費者在做出選購決策時候，其廣告效果除了受到情緒的影響之外，消費者在做出決策當下所處的環境是公開的還是私人的也十分重要。
此外，雖然環保議題逐漸受到重視，但在每個不同的國家、社會之中，其受重視的程度並不相同，因此會存在不同的環保重視程度，而本研究認為這種對環保有著不同重視程度的現象是屬於一種社會規範的概念，期也會影響廣告的效果。
因此根據以上想法，本研究決定以下四個主要研究問題：
(一) 探討情緒對於支持環保程度的影響。
(二) 探討決策情境對於支持環保程度的影響。
(三) 探討社會規範對於支持環保程度的影響。
(四) 探討情緒、決策情境以及社會規範之間對於支持環保程度的交互作用效果。
本研究對於以上四個主要研究問題，發展了六個主要假設，透過實驗方法，得到以下五大結論。
1. 若是選擇在網路、電視這類型比較屬於私人環境的媒介播放廣告，或者消費者可以在比較隱私的環境之作出決策的時候，應該選擇能夠喚起觀眾浪漫渴望的愛情片時段來撥放這類廣告，較為有效。
2. 若是當廣告主選擇在公開環境的資訊媒介撥放廣告，或者是消費者的決策與行為會被大眾一同檢視之時，則應該選擇能夠喚起消費者的恐懼情緒的恐怖片時段來撥放廣告。
3. 社會規範對於消費者的行為影響效果顯著，因此在進行環保廣告的動作前，應先透過描述性規範的使用，告知消費者社會中的其他人都是重視環保的。
4. 在私人環境之下，當整體社會中所存在的社會規範是重視環保之時，環保廣告時段的選擇，就應該選在能夠喚起浪漫渴望的愛情片時段，如此才能夠強化廣告的效果。
5. 若是社會中所普遍存在的社會規範是不重視環保的，應該要先透過描述性規範來改變消費者心中所認知的社會規範方向，再進行進一步的環保教育，如此才能收到良好的環保教育效果。
The public welfare issue such as environmental protection doesn’t have rich resources. We have to pay more attentions on the efficiency of environmental protection advertisement.
Griskevicius already indicate that the consumers with different emotions will affect the efficiency of the advertisement. Besides the emotion issue, we believe that different decision- making situations will also affect the efficiency of the advertisement. Finally, we believe “social norms” is another factor which affect the efficiency of the advertisement.
Based on the above discussion, we propose four major research questions:
1.To discuss how the emotions affect the degree of support for environmental protection.
2.To discuss how the decision-making situations affect the degree of support for environmental protection.
3.To discuss how the social norms affect the degree of support for environmental protection.
4.To discuss the interactive effects of emotions, decision-making situations and social norms to the degree of support for environmental protection.
We use the experimental methods and proposed six hypotheses to find out the answer of the above three research questions. Finally, we got five conclusions:
1.If we want to broadcast the ads on a private media, such as internet and TV channels, we should do this during romantic movie. It will be more efficiency.
2.If we want to broadcast the ads on public media, we should choose the horror movie hours. It will be more efficiency.
3.Social norms have a significant influence on the efficiency of the ads. Before we broadcast the ads, we should use the descriptive norms to educate the consumers that the people in the society are all pay attention to the environmental protection issues.
4.Under the private situation and the environmentally friendly society, we should choose the romance movie hours to broadcast our ads. It will be more efficiency.
5.If we want to broadcast the environmental protection ads in a society which is not environmentally friendly, we should use the descriptive norms to educate the people that the people are all very care about the environmental issues. |
| Reference: | Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113(3), 628.
Batra, R., & Stayman, D. M. (1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness. The Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 203-214.
Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183-194.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice (4th ed.): New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 591-621.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
Cody, M. J., & Seiter, J. S. (2001). Compliance principles in retail sales in the United States. The practice of social influence in multiple cultures, 325-341.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Handbook of emotions, 2, 91-115.
Dahl, D. W., Manchanda, R. V., & Argo, J. J. (2001). Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research.
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide: Aldine.
Dhar, R., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). The effect of common and unique features in consumer choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 23(3), 193-203.
Domjan, M. (2005). Pavlovian conditioning: A functional perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 179-206.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor Doubleday.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 63.
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non) conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281.
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of marketing research, 46(3), 384.
Hochbaum, G. M. (1954). The relation between group members` self-confidence and their reactions to group pressures to uniformity. American Sociological Review, 19(6), 678-687.
Hoyer, W. D., & MacInnis, D. J. (2006). Consumer Behavior (4th ed.): New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Huguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1011.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Cambridge Univ Pr.
Keltner, D., Haidt, J., & Shiota, L. (2006). Social functionalism and the evolution of emotions.
Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110(1), 3.
Kenrick, D. T., & Luce, C. L. (2004). The Functional Mind: Readings in Evolutionary Psychology.: Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kenrick, D. T., & Shiota, M. N. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation (s): An evolutionary perspective.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological bulletin, 107(1), 34.
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions. Psychological Science,, 81(1), 146–159.
Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual review of psychology, 44(1), 585-612.
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., . . . Schaller, M. (2005). Functional Projection: How Fundamental Social Motives Can Bias Interpersonal Perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 63.
Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature: Doubleday Books.
Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind.
Murry, J. P., & Dacin, P. A. (1996). Cognitive moderators of negative-emotion effects: Implications for understanding media context. The Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 439-447.
Myers, D. (2005). Social Psychology (8th ed.): New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. The Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), 102-110.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. The handbook of social psychology, 1, 323-390.
Pham, M. T. (1996). Cue representation and selection effects of arousal on persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 373-387.
Pratkanis, A. R., Pratkanis, A., & Aronson, E. (2001). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion: Holt Paperbacks.
Puntoni, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2007). Social context and advertising memory. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 284-296.
Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. T. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56-77.
Ritson, M., & Elliott, R. (1999). The social uses of advertising: an ethnographic study of adolescent advertising audiences. The Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 260-277.
Saad, G. (2007). The evolutionary bases of consumption: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 379-385.
Schultz, P., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429.
Schwarz, N. (2002). "Feelings as information: Moods influence judgments and processing strategies," in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 534–47.
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. Emotion and social judgments, 55–71.
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195.
Solomon, M. R. (2004). Consumer Behavior (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment Under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 ((6)), 973–988.
Van den Bergh, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2008). Bikinis instigate generalized impatience in intertemporal choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 85. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
98351028
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098351028 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 102801.pdf | 1236Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1076 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
