English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46019344      Online Users : 712
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53628

    Title: 新瓶舊酒?社會/健康問題的再建構---比較生育與毒癮愛滋議題的論述模式
    Other Titles: Reconstructing Social/Health Problems---Comparing Discourses of Fertility and IDU/AIDS Issues in Taiwan
    Authors: 徐美苓
    Contributors: 國立政治大學新聞學系
    Keywords: 生育;毒癮愛滋
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2012-10-17 11:39:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以2004 年起被重新建構其問題面向的「鼓勵生育」與「毒癮愛滋減害」政 策為例,分別探索與比較再建構之社會/健康議題在新聞論述中所呈現之框架以及影響 框架形塑的機制為何?與議題相關的團體代表與決策者如何參與建構過程中各論述的 競爭與互動?相關團體的倡導策略以及媒體本身的吹捧特性(media hype)又是如何影 響問題的再現與相關政策的發展方向?媒體所強調的議題或特定面向,是否會影響閱 聽大眾對其相關議題或特定面向的認知?又,新聞報導內容對大眾的認知影響是否會 隨著新聞報導內容的變化而有所不同? 本研究預計以三年的時間,透過檔案與文獻檢閱、兩波針對《中國時報》、《聯合報》 與《蘋果日報》三報的新聞內容框架與論述分析、兩波電話調查以及針對30 名利益相 關團體、政策決定者、專家以及記者的深度訪談等方式蒐集資料。深度訪談與新聞論 述分析可幫助我們瞭解論述互相流動、競逐以及利益相關者的倡導與框架策略。比對 兩波新聞內容分析與電訪資料則可測試議題設定的效果。
    This study aims to analyze and compare how frames are represented in the news discourses when addressing the reconstructed social problems related to policies on the encouragement of childbearing and HIV/AIDS harm reduction, respectively. Mechanisms shaping the frames such as the stakeholders』advocacy strategies, media hypes, as well as the competing discourses in the reconstruction processes will also be explored. The study will then examine whether the news frames are able to affect the public cognition and attitudes towards the issues. Data collection methods in the three-year study include document and literature reviews, two-wave content analyses and discourse analyses of relevant news stories from China Times, United Daily News, and Apple Daily, two-wave nationwide telephone surveys, as well as personal in-depth interviews with stakeholders, policy makers, issue experts, and journalists. While the qualitative interview and discourse analytic methods can help us understand the dynamics of discourse interaction and competition, including advocacy and framing strategies used by the stakeholders, quantitative content analytic and survey methods can further test the agenda-setting of the news framing.
    Relation: 基礎研究
    研究期間:9708~ 9807
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback