| 參考文獻: | 中文部分
〈2011出版年鑑〉（無日期）。取自行政院新聞局網頁
http://info.gio.gov.tw/Yearbook/100/index.html
〈天下觀點〉（無日期）。取自《天下雜誌》網頁
http://www.cw.com.tw/about/perspective.jsp
〈台灣雜誌搜尋〉（無日期）。取自台北市雜誌商業同業公會網頁
http://www.magazine.org.tw/Magazine
〈台灣媒體廣告營收大調查〉，《動腦》，349: 76-85。
〈南非德班氣候會議對我政策走向的影響與啟示〉（無日期）。取自行政院環境保
護署網頁
http://ivy5.epa.gov.tw/enews/fact_Newsdetail.asp?InputTime=1001214163437
〈關於商周媒體〉（無日期）。取自《商業周刊》網頁
http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/aboutus/aboutus.php
〈寶山第二水庫運用要點〉（無日期）。取自經濟部水利署北區水資源局網頁
http://www.wranb.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=5
《大英百科全書線上繁體中文版》（無日期）。取自
http://daying.wordpedia.com.ezproxy2.lib.nccu.edu.tw/
王石番（1992）。《傳播內容研究法－理論與實證》。台北：幼獅。
王京明（2010）。〈國際環境制衡已逐漸成形〉，卓越新聞獎基金會（編），《面對真相、即刻行動：台灣減碳紀事》，頁19-26。台北：巨流。
尤傅莉譯（2011）。《親愛的臥底經濟學家》，台北：早安財經。（原書 Harford, T.[2009]. Dear undercover economist: Priceless advice on money, work, sex, kids, and life’s other challenges. New York, US: Random House.）
余也魯（1994）。《雜誌編輯學》。香港九龍：海天書樓。
吳宜昭、陳永明、朱容練（2010）。〈台灣氣候變遷趨勢〉，《國研科技》，25(1)：
40-46。
何明修（2006）。《綠色民主：台灣環境運動的研究》。台北：群學。
李幼寅（2004年1月）。〈天下與數位時代半月刊市場挑戰成功？〉，《動腦》，333: 24-25。
林子倫（2008）。〈台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析〉，《公共行政學報》，28：153-175。
林嘉琪、劉力仁（2010年1月31日）。〈《氣候門振盪》暖化派大戰急凍派〉，《自由電子報》。取自
http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/jan/31/today-life12.htm。
周桂田、劉華美（2010年12月）。〈氣候變遷運動與台灣能源密集產業與決策分
析〉，｢2011氣候變遷、風險治理與公眾參與研討會」，台北：台灣大學。
卓亞雄（2010）。〈少了文化背景的環境意識啟蒙〉，卓越新聞獎基金會（編），《面對真相、即刻行動：台灣減碳紀事》，頁61-78。台北：巨流。
柳中明（2010）。《台灣環境變遷解密：改變未來的12堂課》。台北：日月文化。
徐美苓、熊培伶、吳姿嫺、施馨堯、賴若函（2010）。〈台灣人口「問題」的建構：以少子化新聞框架為例〉，《新聞學研究》，103：43-80。
孫曼蘋（2009）。〈新聞雜誌寫作〉，政大傳院媒介寫作教學小組（編），《傳媒類型寫作》，頁185-218。台北：五南。
陳世榮（2007）。〈探究環境治理中的知識溝通：台灣氣候變遷研究的網絡分析〉，《公共行政學報》，25：1-30。
陳洛薇、蕭旭岑（2008年6月6日）。〈省電10%、水20%、紙30% 馬帶頭發起
「節能減碳一二三」〉，《中國時報》，A2版。
陳儒修（2010）。〈電影研究與生活脈絡〉，《傳播研究簡訊》，63：24-26。
陳靜茹、蔡美瑛（2009）。〈全球暖化與京都議定書議題框架之研究－以2001-2007年紐約時報新聞為例〉，《新聞學研究》，100：253-295。
國家災害防救科技中心（2008）。《IPCC 2007氣候變遷評估報告摘錄》。（國家災害防救科技中心年報 2007）。台北：國家災害防救科技中心。
國家災害防救科技中心（2010）。《莫拉克颱風總體回顧》。（國家災害防救科技中心年報 2009）。台北：國家災害防救科技中心。
黃兆慧（2007年8月）。〈做好事也要步步為營〉，《動腦》，376: 17。
黃馨儀（2009年8月4日）。（水庫渴！最快下周大用戶限水），《中國時報》，A6
版。
楊純明、張致盛、陳駿季（2011）。〈因應氣候變遷之調適與緩解策略〉，《作物、環境與生物資訊》，8(4)：254-264。
葉欣誠（2010）。《抗暖化關鍵報告：台灣面對暖化新世界的6大核心關鍵》。台
北：新自然主義。
趙家緯（2010）。〈哥城峰會後、台灣新起跑點〉，卓越新聞獎基金會（編），《面對真相、即刻行動：台灣減碳紀事》，頁41-48。台北：巨流。
趙家緯、謝雯凱（2007）。〈台灣氣候變遷政策的回顧與展望〉，《全球變遷通訊雜誌》，56：16-23。
潘忠黨（2006）。〈架構分析：一個亟需理論澄清的領域〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，1：17-46。
賴文遠（2004）。〈台灣面對全球暖化之衝擊而來的因應對策〉。《應用倫理研究通訊》，32：32-38。
臧國仁（1999）。《新聞媒體與消息來源－媒介框架與真實建構之論述》。台北：
三民。
英文部分
Anderson, A. (1997). Media, culture and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(4), 338-352.
Bell, A. (1994). Climate of opinion: Public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse & Society, 5(1), 33-64.
Boycoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transaction of the
Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477-489.
Boycoff, M. T., & Boycoff, J. M. (2004). Bias as balance: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125-36.
Boycoff, M. T., & Boycoff, J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38(6), 1190-1204.
Carragee, M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233.
Carvalho, A. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(1), 1-29.
Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet, 1985-2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457-1469.
Clinton, P. (1997). Guide to writiong for the business press. New York, NY: Business Press Educational Foundation.
Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representation of global warming. Science Communication, 26(2), 129-153.
Cox, R. (2010). Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
D’Angelo, P., & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Introduction: Doing news framing analysis. In J. Kuypers & P. D’Angelo (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. (pp. 43-83). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dirikx, A., & Gelders, D. (2010). To frame is to explain: A deductive frame-analysis of Dutch and French climate change coverage during the annual UN conferences of the Parties. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 732-742.
Documentary movies at the Box Office Mojo. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=documentary.htm.
Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-28.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Environment News Service. (2006, August 29). Wounded Gulf Coast takes stock one year after Hurricane Katrina. Environment News Service. Retrieved from http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2006/2006-08-29-03.html
Foust, C. R., & Murphy, W. O’S. (2009). Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environmental Communication, 3(2), 151-167.
Gamson, W. A., & Lasch, K. E. (1983). The political culture of social welfare policy. In S. E. Spiro & E. Yuchtman-Year (Eds.), Evaluating the welfare state: Social and political perspectives (pp. 397-415). New York, NY: Academic.
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. Chicago Journals, 95(1), 1-37.
Gavin, N. T. (2009). Addressing climate change: A media perspective. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 765-780.
Gavin, N. T., Leonard-Milson, L., & Montgomery, J. (2011). Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 20(3), 422-438.
Guedes, O. (2000). Environmental issues in Brazilian press. International Communication Gazette, 62(6), 537-554.
Hansen, A. (2010). Environment, media and communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hoffman, A. J. (2011). The culture and discourse of climate skepticism. Science Organization, 9(1), 77-84.
Howard-Williams, R. (2009). Ideological construction of climate change in Australian and New Zealand newspapers. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 28-40). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Hulme, M. (2006, November 4). Chaotic world of climate truth. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/6115644.stm
Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change: Organization. Retrieved from Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change Web site: http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization_history.shtml
Jensen, D. (2009, July 13). Taking shorter showers doesn’t cut it: Why personal change does not equal political change. Orion Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.alternet.org/story/141260
Kenix, L. J. (2008). Framing science: Climate change in the mainstream and alternative news of New Zealand. Political Science, 60(1), 117-132.
Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Global public perception, opinion, and undertanding of climate change: Current patterns, trends, and lmitations. Thematic paper for Human Development Report 2007, United Nations Development Programme.
Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2007-2008/papers/leiserowitz_anthony.pdf
Livesey, S. M. (2002). Globla warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxonmobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, 39(1), 117-148.
Maibach, E., & Priest, H. (2009). No more “business as usual”: Addressing climate change through constructive engagement. Science Communication, 30(3), 299-304.
McManus, P. (2000). Beyond Kyoto? Media representation of an environmental issue.Australian Geographical Studies, 38(3), 306-319.
McComas, K., & Shanahan, J. (1999). Telling stories about global climate change:Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research, 26(1), 30-57.
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522.
Morrish, J. (1996). Magazine editing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Morrish, J. (2003). Magazine editing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In J. Kuypers & P. D’Angelo (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. (pp. 43-83). New York, NY: Routledge.
Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “We don’t really want to know”- Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment, 19(3), 347-370.
Olausson, U. (2009). Global warming－global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science, 18(4), 421-436.
Pettenger, M. E. (2007). The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
Pew Research Center. (2009, October). Fewer Americans see solid evidence of global warming. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center Web site http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1386/cap-and-trade-global-warming-opinion
Reese, S. D. (2003). Prologue－Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr. & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. (pp. 7-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-110.
Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
Tankard, J. W. (2003). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr. & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. (pp. 95-105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: Claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 269-283.
UN Principles for Responsible Investment. (2011, April). Universal ownership: Why environmental externalities matter to institutional investors. Retrieved from the UNPRI web site http://www.unpri.org/
Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484-507.
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78.
Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In J. Kuypers & P. D’Angelo (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. (pp. 84-109). New York, NY: Routledge.
Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risk of communication: Discourse on climate change in science, politics and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261-283.
Wilkins, L. (1993). Between facts and values: Print media coverage of the greenhouse effect, 1987-1990. Public Understanding of Science, 2(1), 71-84.
Wilson, K. (2000). Communicationg climate change through the media: Prediction, politics, and perceptions of risks. In B. Adam, S. Allan & C. Carter (Eds.), Environmental risks and the media. (pp. 201-317). New York, NY: Routledge.
Yin, L., & Wang, H. (2010). People-cantred myth: representation of the Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily. Discourse & Communication, 4(4), 383-398.
Zehr, S. C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 85-103.
Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divid? Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 743-761. |
