English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110119/141062 (78%)
Visitors : 46477298      Online Users : 615
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54874


    Title: 銀行住宅擔保品鑑估價格與契約價格之關係
    The relationship between the contract price and the estimated price of residential collateral by financial institutions
    Authors: 丁嘉言
    Ting, Chia Yen
    Contributors: 張金鶚
    江穎慧

    Chang, Chin Oh
    Chiang, Ying Hui

    丁嘉言
    Ting, Chia Yen
    Keywords: 銀行擔保品估價
    logistic迴歸模型
    機率界限
    Financial institution collateral valuation
    Logistic regression model
    Cutoff point
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 14:03:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 銀行在面對借款人以不動產申請抵押貸款時,產生對住宅擔保品估價之需求,以為債權之確保。然銀行的估價過程與一般估價最大不同,肇因於其估價前,擔保品本身已先產生一組買賣契約價格。過去研究指出,估價會嘗試以某些較易取得的價格資訊作為定錨點(anchor),藉以調整並成為最後的價格。而我國不動產交易價格資訊不透明,契約價格往往由借款人提供的情況下,銀行內部估價人員可能因資訊不易取得、定錨效果,在擔保品的鑑估結果上受到契約價格影響,倘有心人士欲藉此獲得高額貸款、牟取不法利益,將損及銀行債權,即使採用自動估價系統降低人為影響因素,因資料來源不佳,只會產生所謂「garbage in garbage out」的結果。據此,如何分辨契約價格是否具有參考力變成為關鍵,亦為本文欲補足的研究缺口。
    本文採用國內某銀行臺北市不動產擔保品8,348筆估價資料為樣本,建立以挑選契約價格是否具有參考力的機率預測模型,尋求影響能判定契約價格是否具有參考力的主要因素,並研究在最適的機率界限下,篩選出具有參考力的契約價格樣本。而研究結果所建立的模型,其預測並篩選出的契約價格樣本均較未經模型篩選者,對擔保品價格之估計有顯著提升。因此本研究所建立的契約價格篩選模型確能提升銀行估價準確性,使不動產擔保品鑑估價格的形成過程中,獲得更多可靠的參考資訊,降低人為操縱的空間,並在成交價格資訊不足的情況下,提升估價人員對契約價格的辨識能力。
    In the face of the borrower to apply for a mortgage of real estate, financial institutions have estimated the price of the collateral requirements to protect the debt claim. However, the biggest difference with the general valuation and that of financial institutions, valuation of its causes before the collateral itself has produced a first sale contract price. In the past research that one attempts to estimate the price of some greater access to information act to anchor in order to adjust and become the final price. Because financial institutions are not easy to obtain price information on real estate transactions in Taiwan, price information is often provided by the borrower. A small number of loans borrower deliberate fraud to forgery or false irrigation Contract price sale and purchase agreement in order to obtain high credit. Even with the automatic valuation system to reduce the human impact factor, due to poor data sources, it will only produce so-called "garbage in garbage out" of the results. Accordingly, how to tell whether the contract price to a reference force becomes critical, and also in this article want to complement the research gap.
    We adopt 8,348 estate collateral valuation data in Taipei City of a domestic bank for the sample to establish a binary logistic regression model. And we try to seek the main factors that determine whether the contract price of the reference force, and find out the optimal cutoff point, filter out of a sample of the contract price of the reference force. The results confirm the model in this paper. The selected samples of the contract price is estimated that the price of collateral significantly improved compared with those without filtering. Therefore, the model established in this study can really improve the accuracy of bank valuation. Enhance the recognition ability of the bank`s internal appraisers on the contract price in the lack of transaction price information.
    Reference: 台灣金融研訓院,1999,「銀行授信實務法規輯要」,初版。
    王濟川、郭志剛,2008,「Logistic迴歸模型-方法及應用」,五南書局,二版。
    江穎慧,2009,「不動產估價人員系統行為偏誤檢驗─以市場比較法為例」,土地經濟年刊第20期:63-89。
    汪駿旭,2005,「不動產估價人員受客戶影響之研究」,國立政治大學地政學系,碩士論文。
    林子欽、柯光峻,2010,「法拍屋拍定價格對於再轉售價格之定錨效果」,台灣土地研究,13(1):53-68。
    林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚,1996,「住宅價格指數之研究-以台北市為例」,住宅學報,4:1-30。
    林祖嘉,1992,「台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究」,台灣銀行季刊,43(1):279-312。
    林祖嘉、馬毓駿,2007,「特徵方程式大量估價法在台灣不動產市場之應用」,住宅學報,16(2):1-22。
    李月華,1997,「臺北市住宅區成屋交易價格影響因素之研究」,崇右學報,6:130-142。
    李泓見、張金鶚、花敬群,2006,「台北都會區不同住宅類型價差之研究」,台灣土地研究,9(1):63-87。
    李桐豪、呂美慧,2000,「銀行房貸客戶授信評量模式分析─Logistic迴歸之應用」,台灣金融財務季刊,1(1):1-20。
    沈中華、林公韻,2005,「違約機率預測與極端值」,財務金融學刊,13(3)。
    邱奕達,1998,「可及性與繁榮度對房屋現值評定影響之研究-以臺北市為例」,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所,碩士論文。
    周建新、于鴻福、陳進財,2004,「銀行業房貸授信風險評估因素之選擇」,中華管理評論,7(2):77-102。
    洪鴻智、張能政,2006,「不動產估價人員之價值探索過程:估價程序與參考點的選擇」,建築與規劃學報,7(1):71-90。
    許景德,2005,「銀行不動產抵押估價問題之探討」,土地問題研究季刊,104-109。
    馬君梅,2003,「財報分析應用於信用風險的發展趨勢」,會計研究月刊,214,84-94。
    彭建文,2004,「台灣出租住宅市場與自有住宅市場價格調整關係之研究」,都市與計劃,31(4):391-412。
    游適銘,2010,「不動產估價最終估值之形成─權重模式、估值差異與市場景氣之影響」,國立政治大學地政研究所,博士論文。
    陳彥仲、林國民,1998,「臺灣都市住宅屬性隱含需求分析-以高雄市為例」,成功大學學報,33(人文.社會篇) :303-320。
    陳奉瑤,2003,「土地公告現值與交易價格關係之研究」,土地經濟年刊,14:1-24。
    陳奉瑤、楊依蓁,2007,「個別估價與大量估價之準確性分析」,住宅學報,16(2):67-84。
    陳覺惠,2000,「集合住宅與其適用公共設施類型對應關係研究:以台中市為例」,行政院國家科學委員會委託計畫。
    黃麗燕,2008,「資訊不對稱下不動產抵押貸款擔保品估價行為之研究」,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所,碩士論文。
    張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚,2009,「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用-非典型住宅估價之改進」,都市與計劃,36(3):281-304。
    張秀珍,2009,「臺灣銀行產業借貸行為資訊不對稱之研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學管理研究所,博士論文。
    張金鶚、江百信,1995,「我國購屋貸款放款條件之研究」,住宅學報,3:1-20。
    張金鶚、劉秀玲,1993,「房地產品質、價格與消費者物價指數之探討」,國立政治大學學報,67:369-400。
    楊顯爵、林左裕、陳宗豪,2008,「住宅抵押貸款違約之研究—影響因素之顯著性分析」,台灣土地研究,11(2):1-36。
    廖君倬,1999,「台中市"超大坪數"住宅大樓案例與單元特性初探」,東海大學建築學系研究所,碩士論文。
    廖仲仁,1994,「機場噪音對住宅價格之影響:以臺北松山機場附近住宅為例」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所,碩士論文。
    蘇文賢,2000,「應用大量估價法進行公告土地現值評估之研究」,國立政治大學,碩士論文。
    蔡大鐘,2002,「購置住宅與房屋修繕貸款逾期還款之實證研究」,雲林科技大學,財務金融系,碩士論文。
    盧如珍,2003,「土地建物鑑價對房屋貸款違約風險之研究」,國立高雄第一科技大學,財務管理所,碩士論文。
    賴怡君,2003,「定錨效果內在機制之探討--無意識層次與意識層次的定錨效果」,國立政治大學心理學系研究所,碩士論文。
    龔永香、江穎慧、張金鶚,2007,「客觀標準化不動產估價之可行性分析-市場比較法應用於大量估價」,住宅學報,16(2):23-42。
    Aycock, S., 2000, 「The Impact of Fairness, Reference Point, and Human Decision Processing on Negotiation」, Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 54(2): 76-81。
    Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh & R. E. Welsch,1980 「Regression Diagnostics」, New York: John Wiley & Sons。
    Carbone, Robert & Richard L. Longini, 1977, 「A Feedback Model for Automated Real Estate Assessment」,Management Science. 24(3):241-248。
    Clapp, J.M., 1990 「A Methodology for Constructing Vacant Land Price Indices」,AREUEA Journal. 18(3):274-293。
    Clapp, J. M., Y. Deng, and X. An, 2004, 「Alternative models for competing risks of mortgage termination」, working paper.
    Daly, J., 2001, “Economic Sustainability in Real Estate Markets: Implications on a Federal State”, Fourth Sharjah Urban Planning Symposium。
    Diaz, J. III, 1990a, "How appraisers do their work: a test of the appraisal process and the development of a descriptive model", Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol.5, No.1., pp.1-15。
    Diaz, J. III, 1990b, "The process of selecting comparable sales", The Appraisal Journal, Vol.58, No.4, pp.533-540。
    Diaz J, Ⅲ. and A. Hansz, 1997, 「How Valuers Use the Value Opinions of Others」, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15(3): 256-260。
    Dubin, R. A., 1992, 「Spatial Autocorrelation and Neighbourhood Quality」, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22: 433-452。
    Fisher, J. D., Smith, B. C., Stern, J., and Webb, R. B., 2006, 「Analysis of economic depreciation for multi-family property」, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(4): 1-24。
    Frew, J. and G.D. Jud., 2003, 「Estimating the Value of Apartment Building」, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 25(1): 77-86。
    Gallimore, P. and Wolverton, M., 1997, 「Price-knowledge-induced bias: A cross-cultural comparison」, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 15: 261-273。
    Gwin, C. R. and Maxam, C. L., 2002, 「Why do real estate appraisals nearly always equal offer price? A Theoretical Justification」,Journal of Property Investment & Finance,20(3): 242-253。
    Gwin, C. R., Ong, S. E. and Spieler, A. C., 2006, 「Real Estate Appraisal and Transaction Price: An Empirical Eavluation of Alternative Theories」, Journal of Housing Research, 15(1)。
    James A Bryant, Donald R Epley, 1998, 「Cancerphobia Electromagnetic fields and their impact in residential loan values」, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 15(1/2): 115-129。
    Levy, D. & Schuck, E., 1999, “The influence of clients on valuations”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 17, 4: 380-400。
    Levy, D. & Schuck, E., 2005, “The Influence of Clients on Valuations : the clients perspective”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 23, 2: 182-102。
    Lusht, K. M., 1996, 「A Comparison of Prices Brought by English Auction and Private Negotiations」, Journal of Real Estate Economics, 24, 5:17-530。
    Menkhoff, L., Neuberger, D. and Suwanaporn, C., 2006, 「Collateral-based lending in emerging markets:Evidence from Thailand」, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30:1-21。
    Rosen, S.1974 「Hedonic Price and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition」,Journal of Political Ecnomics, 82: 34-55。
    Sirmans. G. S., Macpherson, D. A. and Zietz, E. N., 2005, 「The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models」, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1): 3-43。
    Smith Steve, 2002, 「Predatory Lending, Mortgage Fraud, and Client Pressure」,The Appraisal Journal, Vol.19, No.2, 200-213。
    Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1974, 「Judgment Under Uncertainty」, Science, 185: 1122-1131。
    Wolverton, M. L. and Gallimore, P., 1999, “Client Feedback and the Role of the Appraiser,’ General Journal of Real Estate Research, 18(2-3)。
    Yiu, C. Y., Tang, B. S., Chiang, Y. H. and Choy, L. H. T., 2006 “Alternative Theories of Appraisal Bias”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 14 (3): 341-344。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    97257021
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097257021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    702101.pdf1281KbAdobe PDF2310View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback