Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54882
|
| Title: | 兩岸簽署貨幣清算協議之影響：以貿易人民幣結算為例
The effect of a cross-strait currency settlement agreement-using Renminbi trade settlement as an example |
| Authors: | 梁翠月
Liang, Tsui Yueh |
| Contributors: | 毛維凌
許志義
Mao, Wei Ling
Hsu, Jyh Yih
梁翠月
Liang, Tsui Yueh |
| Keywords: | 工具貨幣
貿易人民幣結算
消費現金付現限制
Vehicle Currency
Renminbi Trade Settlement
Cash-in-Advance on Consumption |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-10-30 14:04:50 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著中國經濟持續高速成長, 國際貿易及投資快速擴展, 中國更積極推動貿
易及投資以人民幣結算, 人民幣在兩岸、 區域甚至全球市場流通可望大幅
增加。
1990年代以來, 兩岸經貿快速發展, 相形下, 雙方貨幣層面合作卻明顯
幾經波折、 踟躕不前, 目前兩岸雖已開啟人民幣現鈔清算服務但尚未建立貨
幣清算機制 , 限制台灣成為人民幣清算平台及後續金融影響力。
本文以 Devereux and Shi(2005) 為主架構, 討論兩岸簽署貨幣清算機
制建立對貿易廠商影響, 主要發現如下:
(1) 於國際貨幣交易需透過工具貨幣 (Vehicle Currency,VC) 現實下, 兩岸人民幣貿易結算無法完全規避匯率風險, 此與台灣中央銀行意見一致, 但當兩岸進出口貿易全數以人民幣結算時, 若台灣使用人民幣銷貨收入購買中
國商品, 台灣對中國消費將完全不受匯率變化影響, 並非所有匯率風險皆由
台灣承擔; 此外, 當中國完全使用人民幣支付自台灣進口商品時, 中國最適
決策代數式和 D-S(2005) 雙邊貨幣直接兌換均衡 (BD) 部分相同, 自2012
年6 月1 日起, 人民幣與日圓直接兌換亦正式於東京和上海外匯市場展開,
結論因而別具政策意涵。
(2) 數值分析發現, 當兩岸進出口貿易全數以人民幣結算時, 台灣及中國總
消費對外國商品消費偏好非常不穩健, 對應所有θ, 中國總消費皆較台灣高,
且隨θ上升快速增加, 由於兩岸皆較雙邊匯兌需透過美元及雙邊貨幣可直接兌換時消費更多商品, 故可知兩岸皆得利於以人民幣進行結算。 對於上述結
論, 需要特別注意的是, 本文以包括台灣、 美國及中國, 且美國為工具貨幣
(VC) 發行國之三國模型, 是在非常特例的情況下進行福利分析, 此時雙邊
貨幣兌換均衡將與對稱交易均衡相同, 影響所及, 結論受校準時使用基準參
數值影響相當大;
(3) 本文依循 D-S(2005), 限制工具貨幣發行國美國以外各國僅能於跨期
間持有美元, 故無法分析中國得以人民幣購買台灣商品下, 台灣累積一定金
額人民幣存量之影響, 然為簡化分析, 排除任何調整過程, 亦為模型不合理
處; 此外, 為簡化模型, 設定中國自台灣進口商品貨款中使用人民幣支付比
率α為外生, 然而該比率實際上應受人民幣在岸、 離岸市場利差及匯差、 全
球景氣變化增加持有美元意願等因素影響, 由於本文僅考慮貿易需求換匯
未考慮套利、 套匯行為, 將留待未來進一步分析。
For the past three decades, a skyrocketing Chinese economy has supported its growing influences on international trade and investment,with Beijing’s active promotion for Renminbi investment and trade settlement, its greater circulation across the strait, in the Asia-Pacific
region or even globally is only to be expected.
Compared with the significantly intensified and institutionalized cross-strait trade and economic exchanges since early 1990s, monetary cooperation across the strait has obviously stalled and progressed slowly. Currently with only a cross-strait cash settlement agreement,but not an establishment of a cross-strait currency settlement mech-
anism clearly limits Taiwan’s prospect to become the next offshore Renminbi center and its future financial influence.
This thesis is based on Devereux and Shi(2005) to query into the effect of a cross-strait currency settlement mechanism for firms engaged in international trade. We find that:
First, under the reality that international currency trade still uti-
lizes U.S. dollar as a vehicle, cross-strait trade settled in Renminbi
could not completely avoid exchange rate risks, which is in accordance
with the opinion from central bank, however, when cross-strait trade
are all settled in Renminbi, Taiwan would not bears all the exchange
rate risks if Taiwan’s imports from China were paid in its Renminbi
sales revenue; Furthermore, when all of China’s imports from Taiwan
are settled in Renminbi, some of the algebraic expressions representing
Chinese consumption and currency exchange decisions would coincide
with the bilateral deviation(BD) equilibrium in D-S(2005) entailing
some intriguing policy implications since starting from June 1,2012,
yuan and yen can trade directly in Tokyo and Shanghai .
Second,numerical analysis found that when cross-strait trade are
all settled in Renminbi, though both sides’ total consumption are not
robust to changes in preference toward foreign goods ,θ, for all θ in the
relevant range , China’s total consumption is greater than Taiwan and
the difference is increase in θ, in addition, they both consume more
than when cross-strait remittance needs to be done via the U.S. dollar
and when New Taiwanese dollar and Chinese yuan trade directly, it
thus can be inferred that both Taiwan and China gain from Renminbi
trade settlement.Though cautions should be taken that a welfare anal-
ysis utilizing a three-country model consisting of Taiwan, China and the United States which further acts as the issuing country of vehicle
currency is an extreme case, in that, bilateral deviation and symmet-
rical trading equilibrium (STE) would be identical and the outcome
highly subjects to benchmark values used in calibration.
Third,The framework is borrowed from Devereux and Shi(2005)
which prohibits non-vehicle countries from holding currencies other
than U.S. dollar intertemporally, hence it could not provide any in-
sights to the effects of the accumulation of a Renminbi pool in Taiwan
under the Renminbi trade settlement scheme, which together with the
fact that to simplify analysis, no adjusting process is included ren-
der the model unreasonable and unrealistic; In addition, to reduce
model construction, α, the percentage of China’s imports from Tai-
wan to be paid in Renminbi is exogenous while in reality it should
be endogenous and collectively determined by factors not exclusive
to the spreads between CNY and CNH, differences in depositing and
lending rates between the onshore and offshore market and investors’
inclination which is affected by the outlook of the global economy to
embrace the safe haven of U.S. dollar. As arbitrage is ruled out and
only currency exchanges for the purposes of trade is considered, all these drawbacks are to be improved upon in further studies. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文部分
[1]李波, 王佐罡, 席鈺 (2011), 跨境人民幣業務與香港人民幣市場, 香港金
融研究中心特別報告第七期。
[2]馬駿 (2011), 人民幣離岸市場發展對中國國內貨幣和金融的影響, 工作
論文。
[3]盧世勳 (2008), 評析港幣改釘住人民幣之可能性, 國際金融參考資料第
五十六輯, 2008/12, 台灣: 中央銀行。
[4]陳美君 (2011), 兩岸貨幣清算卡住了,《台灣銀行家雜誌》,2011卷10, 頁
32–33, 台灣: 財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
[5]葉銀華 (2012), 借力使力 自創平台, 台灣開展離岸人民幣業務之道, 《台
灣銀行家雜誌》, 2012卷5期, 頁14–19, 台灣: 財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
[6]劉紹樑 (2012), 歐盟的教訓: 整而未合 適得其反, 《台灣銀行家雜誌》,
2012卷7期, 頁18–20, 台灣: 財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
[7]邱金蘭 (2012), 陸銀開幕 兩岸金融寫新頁, 《台灣銀行家雜誌》, 2012卷
7期, 頁22–27, 台灣: 財團法人台灣金融研訓院。
[8]沈中華 (2012), 臺灣成為人民幣離岸中心, 臺灣經濟金融月刊第四十八
卷第五期, 頁58–70。
[9]沈中華、 王儷容,(2012), 台北, 有三個競爭對手, 《台灣銀行家雜誌》, 2012
卷7期, 頁34。
[10]余永定 (2012), 從當前的人民幣匯率波動看人民幣國際化, 中國社會科
學院世界經濟與政治研究所國際金融研究中心,Policy Brief No.2012.006。
[11]張穎 (2012), 香港人民幣離岸市場進一步發展的機遇和挑戰, 中銀經濟
月刊,2012/4, 香港: 中國銀行(香港)。
[12]張穎 (2011), 人民幣離岸市場有助強化香港國際金融中心競爭力, 中銀
經濟月刊,2011/6, 香港: 中國銀行(香港)。
[13]張永隆 (2005), 一個台灣經濟的估計動態隨機均衡模型, 行政院國家科
學委員會
[14]國務院發展研究中心課題組 (2011), 人民幣區域化條件與路徑, 北京,
中國發展出版社。
[15]陳暉 (2011), 日圓國際化的經驗與教訓, 北京, 社會科學文獻出版社。
[16]左正光, 葉國俊 (2011), 金融海嘯後中國對於東亞貨幣整合的策略分
析: 亞元與人民幣之間的抉擇, 遠景基金會季刊, 十二卷一期, 頁81–128。
[17]中國人民銀行 (2012),2012年第1季度 中國貨幣政策執行報告, 北京。
[18]中國人民銀行 (2012),2012年第2季度 中國貨幣政策執行報告, 北京。
[19]中央銀行 (2011), 中央銀行新聞發布第155號, 民國100年8月14日, 台
灣。
[20]政制及內地事務局, 立法會內務委員會香港特別行政區配合國家 「十二
五」 規劃工作的最新進展,2011年5月, 立法會 CB(2)1792/10-11(01) 號文件 available at http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr10-11/chinese/hc/papers/hc0520cb2-
1792-1-c.pdf
[21]中國銀行 (香港)(2011), 企業跨境人民幣服務手冊, 頁1–23。
[22]尹德勝 (2009), 人民幣貿易結算對香港廠商影響, 信息季刊2009年秋
季號, Vol.15 Number 3, 香港: 香港出口信用保險局
[23]中國人民大學經濟研究所 (2011), 中國宏觀經濟分析與預測報告2011
年第三季度 (總第19期), 審慎人民幣國際化進程下的香港離岸中心重構—
困境、 定位與政策選擇 , 2011年9月, 北京。
[24]吳青樺 (2012), 派赴臺灣銀行香港分行實習報告, 台灣銀行
二、 英文部分
[1]Andrzej Toroj.(2010)”Adjustment capacity in a monetary union: a DSGE evaluation of Poland and Slovakia,” Working Papers 3, Ministry of Finance in Poland.
[2]Carla Soares(2008)”Impact on Welfare of Country Heterogeneity in a Currency Union”,Estudos e Documentos de Trabalho Working Papers
[3]Chin-Yoong Wong and Yoke-Kee Eng(2010)”Vertically globalized production structure in New Keynesian Phillips curve”,North American Journal of Economics and Finance,21,198 216
[4]Daisy McGregor(2010)”Australia-New Zealand Currency Union:A Structural Approach”,The University of Adelaide School of Economics,Research Paper No. 2010-18.
[5]Devereux, Michael B., Charles Engel, and Peter Storgaard. (2004)”En-
dogenous Exchange Rate Pass-through When Nominal Price Are Set in Advance.”Journal of International Economics, 63, 263 91
[6]Devereux,Michael B.,and Shouyong Shi.(2005)”Vehicle Currency”,unpublished manuscript,June,2005.
[7]Devereux,Michael B.,and Shouyong Shi.(2011)”Vehicle Currency”forthcoming in IER
[8]Dennis Novy(2006)”Hedge Your Costs: Exchange Rate Risk and Endogenous Currency Invoicing”University of Warwick,Warwick Economic Research Papers No 765
[9]Riccardo DiCecio Edward Nelson.(2009)”Euro Membership as a U.K. Monetary Policy Option: Results from a Structural Model,”NBER Working Papers 14894, National Bureau of Economic Research,Inc.
[10]Eiichi Sekine.(2010)”Yuan-denominated Trade Settlement”,Nomura Journal of Capital Markets, Spring Vol1.2 No.1,1-17.
[11]Eiichi Sekine.(2011)”Renminbi Trade Settlement as a Catalyst to Hong Kong’s Development as an Offshore Renminbi Center”,Nomura Journal of Capital Markets, Spring Vol1.2 No.1,1-17.
[12]Eswar Prasad and Lei (Sandy) Ye(2012)”The Renminbi’s Role in the Global Monetary System”,Brookings Institution
[13]Ferdinand Fichtner(2009)”Optimum Currency Area Theory Revisited - New Insights from Stochastic Dynamics”, revised version from a chapter of the author’s PhD thesis
[14]Felix Hammermann(2008)”Inflation Targeting and Monetary Integration under ERM 2: Modelling Third-Country Effects from Production Sharing”, in: D. Stavrek and S. Polouek (eds.), Consequences of the European Monetary Integration on Financial Markets, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle.
[15]Grace H.Y.Lee and M. Azali(2010)”The endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area criteria in East Asia”,Economic Modelling27,165-170
[16]Haihong Gao and Yongding Yu.(2011)”Internationalisation of the renminbi in BIS Papers No 61 Currency internationalisation:lessons
from the global financial crisis and prospects for the future in Asia and the Pacific”,105-124
[17]Hong Kong Monetary Authority.(2011)”The Premier Offshore Renminbi Business Centre”,Hong Kong.
[18]Huang, Kevin X. D. and Zheng Liu(2006)”Seller s Local Currency Pricing or Buyers Local Currency Pricing: Does it Matter for International Welfare Analysis?”,Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,30,1183-213.
[19]Jeffrey Frankel.(2011)”Historical Precedents for Internationalization of the RMB.”,Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies and International Institutions and Global Governance Program.
[20]Kand Shi and Juanyi Xu,(2007)”Optimal Monetary Policy with Vertical Production and Trade”,Review of International Economics,vol.15(3),514-537
[21]Krugman,Paul(1980)”Vehicle currencies and the structure of inter-national exchange”,Journal of Money Credit and Banking12, 513-26.
[22]Linda S. Goldberg Cedric Tille.(2005)”Vehicle Currency Use in International Trade”NBER Working Papers 11127, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[23]Martin Melecky(2008)”A Structural Investigation of Third-Currency Shocks to Bilateral Exchange Rates.” International Finance1,vol.11,19-48.
[24]Mundell,R.A.(1961).”A Theory of Optimal Currency Areas.”American Economic Review51(4): 657-65.
[25]Nathan Chow(2012)”CNH: It’s time to review the personal conversion quota”, DBS Group Research.
[26]Paola Subacchi.2010 ”One Currency,Two
Systems’:China’s Renminbi Strategy”chathamhouse briefing paper IE BP 2010/01 available at http://www.relooney.info/0 N ew 8 823.pdf
[27]Rey,Helene.(2001)”International trade and currency exchange”,Review of Economic Studies,68, 443-64.
[28]Asia Money, Renminbi Focus,Euromoney Publications,v.23:n.5
[29]Santos Silva,J.M.C Tenreyro,Silvana(2010).”Currency Unions in Prospect and Retrospect,”CEPR Discussion Papers 7824.
[30]Seppo Orjasniemi(2010)”The effect of openness in a small open monetary union”,Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 18
[31]Sharon G.M Koh and Grace H.Y.Lee.(2010)The economic feasibility of an optimum currency area in east asia
[32]Stephan Schulmeister.(2000)”Globalization without global currency: the double role of the dollar as national currency and world currency”,Journal of post Keynesian Economics,Vol.22,No.3 365
[33]Swift RMB Tracker,April,2012, Europe is fuelling offshore RMB.
[34]Swift RMB Tracker,May,2012, A bronze medal for RMB in Trade Finance.
[34]Swift RMB Tracker,June,2012, The yuan-yen tango.
[35]Swift, RMB internationalisation:Implications for the global financial industry.
[36]Takatoshi Ito,Satoshi Koibuchi,Kiyotaka Sato,Junko Shimizu.(2010),Why has the yen failed to become a dominant invoicing currency in Asia? a firm-level analysis of Japanese exporters’ invoicing behavior”,NBER working paper series,Working Paper 16231
[37]T.Cavoli and Ramkishen Rajan.(2007)”Exploring the Case for Monetary Integration Between Mainland China and Hong Kong”.China and the World Economy,15:4 July-August 2007, pp 17-34.
[38]Teo, Wing Leong(2009)”Should East Asia’s currencies be pegged to the yen? The role of invoice currency,” Journal of the Japanese and
International Economies, vol. 23(3), pages 283-308, September.
[39]Vanessa Rossi and William Jackson.(2011)”Hong Kong’s Role in Building the Offshore Renminbi Market”,International Economics Programme Paper,Chatham House.
[40]Xu, Juanyi(2011)”The optimal currency basket under vertical trade”,Journal of International Money and Finance,30,pp.1323-1340.
[41]Tang, Yao and Pang, Ke(2011)”Vertical Trade, Asymmetric Exchange Rate Pass-Through, and Canada’s Exchange Rate Regime.”,Working Paper Series. Paper 3. http://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/econpapers/3
[42]Yue, Eddie and He,Dong(2008)”The Future of the Renminbi and Its Impact on the Hong Kong Dollar”,Cato Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2(Spring/Summer 2008) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
99258020
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099258020 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 802001.pdf | 19808Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 490 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
