政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/54951
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 111210/142126 (78%)
造访人次 : 48143452      在线人数 : 507
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54951


    题名: 促進污染土地再利用之探討
    The research on stimulating the reuse of contaminated land
    作者: 邱建頴
    Chiu, Chien Ying
    贡献者: 林子欽
    Lin, Tzu Chin
    邱建頴
    Chiu, Chien Ying
    关键词: 污染土地
    整治
    分類模式
    contaminated land
    remediation
    classification model
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2012-10-30 14:26:39 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國自2000年土污法公布施行以來，至今(2012年)已逾12年，但綜觀環保署之國內場址列管情形統計資料可知，目前我國正面臨污染土地整治推動遲緩的問題。整理國內外相關文獻可知污染土地整治有其必要性，其原因在於如果污染土地持續閒置且不整治重新利用，不僅導致污染土地所造成的問題無法解決，另一方面也會使污染土地因整治而帶來的效益無從實現。而污染土地整治遲緩可能來自污染土地市場存在外部性難以內部化的情形，因此如何解決市場失靈之現象為其關鍵所在。

    國外解決污染土地市場失靈的作法，主要分為「誘因給予」與「處罰」二大方式。本研究進一步將其概念透過問卷調查與實際訪談之方式，探討我國污染土地地主及承租人於整治污染土地實務上所面臨的困難，及對促進污染土地再利用相關作法之看法。

    實證結果顯示，整治污染土地所面臨的最主要困難為整治經費過高、環境顧問公司市場混亂。於促進污染土地整治再利用的作法上，絕大多數地主及承租人偏好誘因給予方式，例如補助整治經費與減免相關稅負；相對地，較不贊成處罰方式，其原因在於增加財務負擔可能提高污染行為人放棄整治的風險，進而阻礙污染土地的整治再利用。此外，公開污染土地相關資訊供污染行為人參考、引進環境保險相關制度等作法，對未來污染土地整治之推行亦有極大助益。

    從實證結果進一步歸納可知影響污染土地整治的因素包含「個別因素」與「總體因素」，並將其發展出一套污染土地分類模式。實際應用我國污染土地統計資料於該模式可知，放棄整治此類型的土地占我國污染土地總面積相當低之比例。因此，政府如能有效推動全面性基礎制度的建置，並搭配相關作法，我國在污染土地的整治推行上應能達到不錯之成效。
    It has been over 12 years since the announcement of Soil and Groundwater Act in year 2000 in Taiwan. However, statistics revealed by the Environmental Protection Administration suggests that the progress of remediation of contaminated land is far from satisfactory. A number of studies have pointed out that if contaminated land continues to be idle, not only can contamination not be solved, but also benefits resulting from remediation are lost. The market for contaminated land suffers from the external effects that in turn lead to a slow pace of remediation. Therefore, how to solve the problem of market failure is the key to promotion of reusing contaminated land.

    There are two major approaches to alleviating the problems of market failure for contaminated land; they are incentives and liabilities, respectively. In this study, we investigate into landowners and tenants of contaminated land through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. We intend to discover the difficulties they have encountered in practice and also their views in respect of the approaches that might stimulate the reuse of contaminated land. Empirical results show that the primary difficulties on remediation are the excessive costs and dissatisfactory service of environmental consulting firms. Besides, among the alternative approaches that are expected to accelerate remediation, interviewees tend to prefer incentives over liabilities. They argue that if the government imposes liabilities upon landowners and tenants, their possibility of giving up remediation will be raised. Furthermore, supply of more complete information and introduction of environmental insurance are thought to be able to facilitate remediation in the future.

    Overall, the empirical evidence highlights a number of contributing factors to an effective remediation. To take a step further, we develop a model to classify the contaminated land in terms of their characteristics such as location, land values…etc. Application of this classification model to two cities suggests that contaminated land that needs direct governmental subsidy only accounts for a small proportion of the total contaminated areas. As a result, we urge the government to establish a platform to provide comprehensive and transparent information. This information platform shall be able to significantly improve the progress of remediation of contaminated land largely through the reinstatement of market mechanism.
    參考文獻: 1.中文文獻

    丁力行 (2000) 土壤及地下水污染整治法實務與因應對策。臺北：永然文化出版股份有限公司。
    李泳龍、黃宗誠、陳定國 (2002) 污染土地估價方法之研究-以台鹼安順廠污染區域為例。2002年第二屆全國災害危機處理學術研討會論文集. pp1-267~1-281。
    李俊錡 (2008) 受污染土地估價之研究。長榮大學在職專班碩士論文。
    林子欽，陳振惟 (2009) 受污染工業土地之風險、污名與價值：美國經驗的啟示。住宅學報。18(2): 23-44。
    林森田 (2005) 土地經濟理論與分析。臺北：政大書城。
    吳明隆 (2007) SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北：五南。
    張孟秋 (2010) 台灣土地開發機制之探討-以外部成本內部化為中心。土地問題研究季刊。9(3)：92-100。
    許紹峰、徐世榮 (2002) 土壤污染整治政策之探討。土地問題研究季刊。1(1)：52-63。
    蔡慧君 (2002) 論土壤與地下水污染整治法之仲介者責任主體判斷標準—以美國法院CERCLA案件判解為例釋疑。國立中正大學法學集刊。7：89-146。

    2.英文文獻

    Adair, A., Berry, J., and Gibb, K. (2004) Bench-marking urban regeneration. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
    Adams, D. (2004) The changing regulatory environment for speculative housebuilding and the construction of core competencies for brownfield development, Environment and Planning A. 36: 601–624.
    Adams, D. , De Sousa, C. , and Tiesdell, S. (2010) Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches, Urban Studies. 47(1): 75-104.
    Adams, D. , Disberry, A. , Hutchiosn, N. , and Munjoma, T. (2000) Mind the gap! : Taxes, subsidies and the behaviour of brownfield owners, Land Use Policy . 17: 135-145.
    Adams, D. , Disberry, A. , Hutchiosn, N. , and Munjoma, T. (2001) Ownership constraints to brownfield redevelopment, Environment and Planning A. 33: 453-477.
    Alberini, A. , Longo, A. , Tonin, S. , Trombetta, F. , and Turvani, M. (2004) The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: evidence from surveys of developers, Regional Science and Urban Economics. 35 (2005):327– 351.
    Bell, R. (1998) The Impact of Detrimental Conditions on Property Values, The Appraisal Journal. 66(4): 380–91.
    Bell, R. (1999) Real Estate Damages: An Analysis of Detrimental Conditions. Chicago, Appraisal Institute.
    Civic Trust (1998) Housing and Regeneration - How a Greenfield Levy Can Help. Civic Trust, London.
    Dale, L., J. C. Murdoch, M. A. Thayer and P. A. Waddell (1999), Do Property Values Rebound from Environmental Stigmas? Evidence from Dallas, Land Economics. 75(2): 311–5.
    Dixon, T. (2007) The Property Development Industry and Sustainable Urban Brownfield Regeneration in England: An Analysis of Case Studies in Thames Gateway and Greater Manchester, Urban Studies. 44(12): 2379-2400.
    Dixon, T. , Otsuka, N. , and Abe, H. (2011) Critical success factors in urban brownfield regeneration: an analysis of “hardcore” sites in Manchester and Osaka during the economic recession (2009-10), Environment and Planning A. 43: 961-980.
    Dixon, T., Pocock, Y. and Waters, M. (2006) An analysis of the UK development industry’s role in brownfield regeneration, Journal of Property Investment and Finance. 24(6): 521–541.
    English Partnerships (2003) Towards a National Brownfield Strategy. The National Regeneration Agency.
    Guntermann, K. L. (1995) Sanitary Landfills, Stigma and Industrial Land Values, Journal of Real Estate Research. 10(5): 531–42.
    Higgins, B. (2004) Brownfield development opportunities in long island city, New York: an analysis of federal, state, and local brownfield incentive programs. Master of Science in Real Estate Development at Columbia University.
    HMRC (2009a) Outline of Land Remediation Relief, CIRD60005, April, Her Majesty Revenue & Customs, UK.
    HMRC (2009b) Land Remediation Relief - Outline - Land in a contaminated state, CIRD60015, April, Her Majesty Revenue & Customs, UK.
    HMRC (2009d) Land Remediation Relief - detailed guidance, CIRD60050, April, Her Majesty Revenue & Customs, UK.
    Howland, M. (2000) The Impact of Contamination on the Canton/Southeast Baltimore Land Market. American Planning Association Journal. 66(4): 411-420.
    Jackson, T. O. (2002) Environmental Contamination and Industrial Real Estate Prices, Journal of real estate research. 23(01/02): 179-200.
    Kiel, K. A. and K. T. McClain (1996) House Price Recovery and Stigma after a Failed Siting, Applied Economics. 28(2): 1351–8.
    Kohlhase, J. E. (1991) The Impact of Toxic Waste Sites on Housing Values, Journal of Urban Economics. 30: 1–26.
    McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze and B. Hurd(1990) The Effect of Risk Beliefs on Property Values: A Case Study of a Hazardous Waste Site, Risk Analysis. 10(4): 485–97.
    Page, G. W. and H. Rabinowitz (1993) Groundwater Contamination: Its Effects on Property Values and Cities, Journal of the American Planning Association. 59(4): 473–81.
    Patchin, P. J. (1994) Contaminated Properties and the Sales Comparison Approach, The Appraisal Journal. 62(3): 402–9.
    POST, PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (1998) A brown and pleasant land. POST, London.
    Regional Analytics Inc. (2002) A Preliminary Investigation into the Economic Impact of Brownfield Redevelopment Activities in Canada, prepared for The National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.
    Simons, R. A., W. M. Bowen, and A. J. Sementelli (1997) The Effect of Underground Storage Tanks on Residential Property Values in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Journal of Real Estate Research. 14(1/2): 29–42.
    Simons, R. A., W. M. Bowen, and A. J. Sementelli (1999) The Price and Liquidity Effects of UST Leaks from Gas Stations on Adjacent Contaminated Property. The Appraisal Journal. 67(2): 186–94.
    Syms, P. (2004) Previously Developed Land: Industrial Activities and Contamination. Blackwell Publishing.
    Turvani, M. and Tonin, S. (2008) Brownfields Remediation and Reuse: an opportunity for Urban Sustainable Development. In Clini, C. eds. Sustainable Development and Environmental Management: Experience and Case Studies. Pp. 397-411.
    Urban Task Force (1999a) Towards an Urban Renaissance. Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, Wetherby.
    Wise, K. and J. Pfeifenberger (1994) The Enigma of Stigma: The Case of the Industrial Excess Landfill, Toxics Law Reporter. March 1994, 1435–41.
    Xu, R. (2006) Brownfield Financing in the United States: From Social Benefit- Cost Perspective. Master in City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    99257017
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099257017
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    701701.pdf713KbAdobe PDF21163检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈