Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56305
|
| Title: | 研發支出與資本支出對公司績效及股價報酬之關聯分析
The Related Analysis of R&D Expenditure and Capital Investment on Corporate Performance and Stock Price |
| Authors: | 葉一青 |
| Contributors: | 姜堯民
葉一青 |
| Keywords: | 研究發展支出
資本支出
企業經營績效
股價報酬率
R&D Expenditure
Capital Investment
Corporate Performance
Tobin`s Q Ratio
Stock price |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-12-03 11:23:48 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文的研究意旨在於探討企業所投入的研究發展支出及資本支出對經營績效及股價報酬產生何種影響，希望能提供給企業經營者在決定研發政策或資本支出決策時參考。
本論文以國內上市櫃公司（除金融服務業外）作為研究樣本，並以2001年至2011年間為實證期間，進行迴歸模型分析，探討研發支出、資本支出等重大支出對於公司經營績效及股價報酬所產生的效果，並探討國內電子次產業如半導體產業、光電產業、電腦周邊產業及電子零組件產業在研發與資本支出對經營績效與股價報酬的影響差異度；本論文在公司經營績效及市場價值的衡量指標，係以公司之資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、營業毛利率、營業淨利率、營收成長率及公司Tobin’s Q值與股價報酬等作為衡量指標。
實證結果發現：
一、 就全體產業而言，研究發展支出對於企業之營業毛利率、營業淨利率及Tobin’s Q值有顯著正相關，但對於企業之營收成長率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率以及公司股價報酬率等項目並未出現顯著相關性；資本支出對企業之資產報酬率及股東權益報酬率則出現顯著負相關，同時資本支出對企業Tobin’s Q值及股價報酬率出現顯著負相關，但對於企業之營收成長率、營業毛利率、營業淨利率等未出現顯著相關性。
二、 針對電子次產業實證結果：
1. 針對半導體產業實證發現，研究發展支出對於公司資產報酬率出現顯著正相關，資本支出對於公司Tobin’s Q值及股價報酬率則呈現顯著負相關。
2. 針對光電產業的實證發現，研究發展支出對於企業經營績效指標包括公司營收成長率、營業毛利率、營業淨利率、資產報酬率及股東權益報酬率等，全數呈現顯著正相關；而資本支出對於公司Tobin’s Q值或股價報酬率呈現顯著正相關，但對於營業毛利率、營業淨利率、資產報酬率及股東權益報酬率等則呈現顯著負相關。
3. 針對電腦週邊產業的實證發現，研究發展支出對於公司營收成長率、營業淨利率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率及公司Tobin’s Q值等皆呈現顯著正相關；而資本支出則對於公司營收成長率出現顯著正相關。
4. 針對零組件產業的實證發現，研究發展支出對於公司營收成長率、營業毛利率、營業淨利率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率、公司Tobin’s Q值及股價報酬率等全數呈現顯著正相關；而資本支出對於公司營業毛利率、資產報酬率及股東權益報酬率等出現顯著負相關。
This research mainly examines the related effect of R&D expenditure and capital investment on corporate performance and company’s stock price. The results of this study are trying to offer reference opinions to corporate executive officers that will make R&D or capital investment decisions.
In this study, the database includes the listed companies in Taiwan Stock exchange except the finance industry from 2001 to 2011. We adopt R&D expenditure and capital investment as the independent variables of evaluating of corporate performance and company’s stock price, and also choose the growth rate of sales, the operating margin ratio, the net profit margin ratio, the return on total assets, the return on equity, Tobin`s Q Ratio and company’s stock price as the dependent variables. The results of this investigation could be summarized as follows:
1. For all targeted industries, R&D expenditure had positive, significant influence on the operating margin ratio, the net profit margin ratio and Tobin`s Q Ratio. Capital investment had negative, significant influence on the return on total assets, the return on equity, Tobin`s Q Ratio and company’s stock price.
2. For Semiconductor industry, R&D expenditure had positive, significant influence on the return on total assets. Capital investment had negative, significant influence on Tobin`s Q Ratio and company’s stock price.
3. For Optoelectronics industry, R&D expenditure had positive, significant influence on growth rate of sales, the operating margin ratio, the net profit margin ratio, the return on total assets, the return on equity. Capital investment had positive, significant influence on Tobin`s Q Ratio and company’s stock price.
4. For Computer peripheral industry, R&D expenditure had positive, significant influence on growth rate of sales, the operating margin ratio, the net profit margin ratio, the return on total assets, the return on equity, and Tobin`s Q Ratio. Capital investment had positive, significant influence on the growth rate of sales.
5. For Electronic components/material industry, R&D expenditure had positive, significant influence on growth rate of sales, the operating margin ratio, the net profit margin ratio, the return on total assets, the return on equity, Tobin`s Q Ratio and company’s stock price. Capital investment had negative, significant influence on the operating margin ratio, the return on total assets and the return on equity. |
| Reference: | 1. 林惠玲、陳正倉，2002，行政院國科會專題研究「研究發展、專利權與經濟效益：台灣1996~2000年追蹤資料之驗證」研究論文。
2. 林惠玲、李顯峰，1996，「臺灣專利權數與R&D 支出關係之研究-非負整數計量模型之應用」，經濟論文叢刊第24卷研究論文。
3. 李美範，2009，研發支出及資本支出對企業經營績效的影響--以臺灣資通訊產業為例；國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。
4. 吳青松、吳宗璠及林美鳳，2005年會計理論與實務研討會，「資訊科技投資與企業績效之關係—從企業生命週期論析」論文及資訊管理學報第15卷研究論文。
5. 吳安妮、吳佳瑋,2006，研發投入與產出對於企業經營績效之遞延效果－以我國電子業上市上櫃公司為例；政大會研所未出版碩士論文。
6. 金成隆、林修葳、紀信義，2005年中山管理評論學報第13卷，「專利權的價值攸關性：從企業生命週期論析」經濟研究論文。
7. 楊志海、陳忠榮(2002)，「研究發展、專利與生產力-臺灣製造業的實證研究」，經濟論文叢刊第30卷研究論文；陳忠榮(2000)，「研究發展、專利與市場價值- Tobin’s Q 理論的運用」論文。
8. 陳昭富，2002，資本投資與股票報酬率之間的長期關係；國立東華大學國際經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
9. 陳炳宏，2009，資本支出、股權結構對公司績效影響－以鋼鐵產業為例；國立中山大學經濟學研究所未出版碩士論文。
10. 陳美霜，2010，資本支出與公司績效之關聯性研究；逢甲大學會計所未出版碩士論文。
11. 程銀宗，1999，資本支出宣告之市場反應影響因素探討；國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
12. 黃智聰、高安邦、許敬基，2003年創新資訊科技政策與數位社會國際學術研討會 「研究發展對生產效率的影響及產業內的外溢效果-台灣IT產業的實證研究」經濟研究論文。
13. 葉集賢，2009，研發支出及資本支出對企業經營績效之影響-以臺灣半導體產業為例；國立成功大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
14. 盧彥儒，2011，台灣IC設計產業智慧資本對經營績效影響之研究；國立交通大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
15. 謝劍平，1995，以公司托賓Q 比率預測股價對公司投資變動的反應，管理評論叢刊，第14卷第1期研究論文，民國84年。
16. Andrew H. Chen, John W. Kensinger and John D. Martin, 2002, “Proven Ways to Increase Shares Value,” Journal of Applied Finance.
17. Connory, R.A. and M. Hirschy, 1990, “Firm Size and R&D Effectiveness: A Value-Based Test,”Economics Letters, 32,277-281.
18. Chan S., J. Martin and J. Kensinger. 1990, “Corporate research and development expenditures and share value,”Department of Finance Working Paper, University of Texas at Austin.
19. Chung, KH, Wright, P. and Charoenwong, C., 1998 January. “Investment opportunities and market reaction to capital expenditure decisions,”Journal of Banking and Finance.
20. Chung, KH and SW Pruitt, 1994, “A Simple Approximation of Tobin`s q,” Financial Management 23, 70-74.
21. Griliches, Z., 1981, “Market Value, R&D, and Patents,” Economics Letters, 7(2), 183-187.
22. Griliches, Z., 1990, “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicator,”Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1701.
23. Griner, E. H. and L. A. Gordon, 1995, “Internal cash flow, insider ownership, and capital expenditures: A test of the pecking order and managerial hypotheses.”
24. Hall, B., Griliches, Z. and J.A. Hausman, 1986, “Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?”International Economic Review, 27, 65-83.
25. Hall, B.1993, “The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980’s, ”American Economic Review ,83,259-264.
26. Hall, B., 1999, “Innovation and Market Value,”NBER Working Paper Series, No 6984.
27. Jarrell G.A., K. Lehn and W. Marr. 1985 , “Institutional ownership, tender offers and long-term investments ,” Working paper. Office of the Chief Economist, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.
28. Lang, HP. , RM Stulz and RA Walking, 1989, “Managerial Performance, Tobin`s Q and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 137-154.
29. Lindenberg and Ross, 1981, “Tobin`s Q ratio and industrial organization,” Journal of Business.
30. McConnel, J., Muscarella, C., 1985, “Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 399-422.
31. Michael E. Porter，1990，The Competitive Advantage of Nations； New York，The Free Press。Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors (Free Press, New York, NY)
32. Pakes, A., 1985, “On Patents, R&D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return,”Journal of Political Economy, 93,390-409.
33. Pakes, A. and Z. Griliches., 1980, “Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report,”Economics Letters, 5,377-381.
34. Pat Drosey,2008, “The Little book that build wealth, ”Published by John Wiley&Sons.
35. Scherer, F. M., 1965, “Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions.” The American Economic Review 55(5): 1097-1125
36. Sougiannis, T., 1994, “The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D.” The Accounting Review. 69(1): 44-68.
37. Titman, S., K.C. John Wei, and F. Xie, 1999, “Capital Investments and Stock Returns”, working paper.
38. Tobin, J.1969, “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking ,1,15-29.
39. Woolridge, J. R., and Snow, C. C. 1990. “Stock market reaction to strategic investment decisions.” Strategic Management Journal. 11, 353-363.
40. World Economic Forum,WEF,The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2012；http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-competitiveness/index.html
41. Zvi Griliches and Jacques Mairesse, 1981. "Productivity and R and D at the Firm Level," NBER Working Papers 0826, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
95932231
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095932231 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 223101.pdf | | 2101Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1325 | View/Open | | 223102.pdf | | 68Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 336 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
