English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48007057      Online Users : 1041
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59015


    Title: 由歐洲人權公約第八條案例論個別人權和集體人權的關係
    The Relationship between Individual and Collective Human Rights in Light of Cases Regarding Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights
    Authors: 梁思城
    Martin Lavicka
    Contributors: 陳純一
    梁思城
    Martin Lavicka
    Keywords: 人權
    人權法
    歐洲人權公約
    歐洲人權法院
    個別人權
    集體人權
    human rights
    human rights law
    European Convention on Human Rights
    European Court of Human Rights
    individual human rights
    collective human rights
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-07-23 14:02:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 此篇論文係以歐洲人權公約第八條隱私權為中心,繼而論述個人和集體人權間所存在之關係將牴觸歐洲人權公約之一致性。本研究分析是以歐洲人權法院針對同時抵觸歐洲人權公約第八條所涵蓋之個人與集體隱私權做出的判決為依據,希冀藉此尋找一可能的判決模式以解釋個人與集體人權對歐洲人權法院而言,孰優孰劣之關係。之所以著重於歐洲人權公約第八條是因其涵蓋範圍較廣,除了民族、性別、弱勢宗教自由權外,更涉及了反恐機制、以及環境保護等議題。這進而說明了個別人權與集體人權間的關係不僅可應用於截然不同的領域,亦可類推至其他人權機制。
    This thesis focuses on the relationship between individual and collective human rights in light of the Article 8: Right to respect for private and family life of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The main argument is that there is a specific relationship between these two groups of rights, which could possibly contest the consistency of the ECHR. This thesis looks for possible explanations and patterns, which would explain the decisive argument for either individual or collective human rights, to prevail at the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis is based on various judgments from the European Court of Human Rights, dealing with rights predominantly covered by the Article 8, where individual and collective human rights are contested. The focus on the Article 8 of the ECHR is mainly because it covers a broad spectrum of issues such as ethnic, sexual, and religion minority rights, anti-terrorism measurements, and environmental protection issues. This could illustrate that the specific relationship between individual and collective human rights can be identified in completely different issue areas and settings, and analogically in other human rights systems.
    Reference:  Conventions and Covenants
    The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm (accessed Nov. 30, 2012).
    The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 1979. http://www.bayefsky.com/treaties/cedaw.php (accessed Nov. 30, 2012).
    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966. http://www.bayefsky.com/treaties/ccpr.php (accessed Nov. 30, 2012).
    The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), 1966. http://66.36.242.93/treaties/cescr.php (accessed Dec. 1, 2012).
    The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948. http://www.un.org/en/ documents/udhr (accessed Nov. 30, 2012).
     Articles and Publications
    Anagnostou, Dia, and Evangelia Psychogiopoulou. The European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in National Context. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.
    Brems, Eva. Human Rights: Universality and Diversity. International Studies in Human Rights. The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2001.
    Callaway, Rhonda L., and Julie Harrelson-Stephens. Exploring International Human Rights: Essential Readings. Critical Connections. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007.
    Dijk, P. van, G. J. H. van Hoof, and A. W. Heringa. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. 3rd ed. The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998.
    Donnelly, Jack. International Human Rights. Dilemmas in World Politics. 3rd ed. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2007.
    Donnelly, Jack. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.
    Donnelly, Jack. “The Relative Universality of Human Rights,” Human Rights Quarterly 29, 2007.
    Forowicz, Magdalena. "The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights." doctoral, Universität Zürich, 2010.
    Human Rights Law 2010-2011. New York: Routledge, 2010.
    James, Stephen. Universal Human Rights. New York, LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2007.
    Landman, Todd. Human Rights. Sage Library of International Relations. 4 vols Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010.
    Landman, Todd. Studying Human Rights. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006.
    Letsas, George. A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford UK ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
    Loucaides, Loukis G. The European Convention on Human Rights, Collected Essays. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007.
    Macken, Claire. Counter-terrorism and the Detention of Suspected Terrorists. New York: Routledge, 2011.
    Mazower, Mark. “The Strange Triumph of Human Rights, 1930-1950,” The Historical Journal, 47, No. 2. 2004.
    Moeckli, Daniel, Sangeeta Shah, Sandesh Sivakumaran, and D. J. Harris. International Human Rights Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    Mowbray, Alastair. The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.
    Nickel, James W. Making Sense of Human Rights. 2nd ed. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub. 2007.
    Nussbaum, Martha C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge. The Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    Rehman, Javaid. International Human Rights Law: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed. Harlow, England; N.Y.: Pearson Longman, 2009.
    Rehman, Javaid. The Weaknesses in the International Protection of Minority Rights. The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000.
    Reid, Karen. A Practitioner`s Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights. 4th edition. ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2011.
    Steiner, Henry J., Philip Alston, and Ryan Goodman. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals: Text and Materials / Henry J. Steiner, Philip Alston, Ryan Goodman. 3rd ed. Oxford UK; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
    Weissbrodt, David S., and Connie de la Vega. International Human Rights Law: An Introduction. Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
    Weissbrodt, David S. International Human Rights : Law, Policy, and Process. 4th ed. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2009.
    Weissbrodt, David S., and Mary Rumsey. Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups and Human Rights. Human Rights Law. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011.
    White, Robin C. A., Clare Ovey, and Francis Geoffrey Jacobs. Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. 5th ed. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
     Cases
    Case of Szijjarto v. Hungary, A/61/38 (2006).
    Case of Airey v. Ireland, Application No. 6289/73 (1979).
    Case of Axel Springer v. Germany, Application No. 39954/08 (2012).
    Case of Botta v. Italy, Application No. 21439/93 (1998).
    Case of Buckley v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 20348/92 (1996).
    Case of Chapman v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 27238/95 (2001).
    Case of Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 7525/76 (1981).
    Case of Elsholz v. Germany, Application No. 25735/94 (2000).
    Case of Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 4158/05 (2010).
    Case of Gillow v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 9063/80 (1987).
    Case of K v. Germany, Application No. 61827/09 (2012).
    Case of Lautsi and Others v. Italy, Application No. 30814/06 (2011).
    Case of Marckx v. Belgium, Application No. 6833/74 (1979).
    Case of Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 5947/72; 6205/73; 7052/75; 7061/75; 7107/75; 7113/75; 7136/75 (1983).
    Case of Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 6538/74 (1979).
    Case of V.C. v. Slovakia, Application No. 18968/07 (2011).
    Case of Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC] - 40660/08 (2012).
    Case of Lovelace v. Canada, Communication No. R.6/24*/ (1981).
    Press Release issued by the Registrar of the Court No. 45. ECHR. February 2, 2012.
    Press Release issued by the Registrar of the Court No 177. ECHR. March 2, 2010.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交研究所
    100253033
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100253033
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    303301.pdf1524KbAdobe PDF2338View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback