English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47813386      Online Users : 1123
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/59201
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59201


    Title: 行禮如儀─探討Facebook互動儀式鏈與互動策略
    Go Through the Motions: “Like” as Social Strategy in Interaction Ritual Chain on Facebook
    Authors: 黃淑琳
    Huang, Shu Lin
    Contributors: 陳百齡
    黃淑琳
    Huang, Shu Lin
    Keywords: 互動儀式鏈
    社交迷思
    互動策略
    臉書
    網路中介儀式
    CMC
    Facebook
    “Like”
    Interaction Ritual Chain
    Interaction Strategy
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-09-02 15:07:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 社交網站Facebook鼓勵使用者將真實世界中的人際關係串連至線上空間,與各種親疏遠近的朋友進行互動與維持情感交流。隨著社交規模與範圍的擴大,Facebook使用者需要透過規格化或公式化的互動,確保人際網絡的穩定交流。這些行為經過反覆實踐,發展為社交互動儀式。然而,互動行為本身卻與社交初衷逐漸背離。因此,本研究關注的正是Facebook上的互動儀式鏈如何呈現,以及使用者社交行為與意義之間產生落差,導致「行禮如儀」的原因。

    本研究以社會學者Goffman(1955)互動儀式與Collins(2004)互動儀式鏈的理論為基礎,探討Facebook的網路中介儀式形成的契機與淪於形式的可能。研究方法方面,本研究選出四則關鍵個案,先以內容分析檢視互動儀式鏈中各項元素的組成;再從個案中選取具代表性的當事人與參與者進行深度訪談,進一步探究實踐互動儀式的原因、時機與對象等細節,並檢視互動儀式過程與結果。

    研究結果顯示,雖然社交訊息事件都有機會發展為完整的互動儀式鏈,不過訊息事件的類型差異會影響互動儀式鏈的參與形式。此外,研究發現乍看毫無意義的網路互動行為(尤指按讚)並非如過往研究提到的扁平單一,甚至略帶貶意。這些互動其實乘載多重含意,例如:避免表錯情的慰問、掩飾內心掙扎的祝福、欲辯忘言的關注、對多義訊息的部分贊同等。每當使用者內心與行動不一致或脫鉤時,這些行為便成為每一次的緩衝,調解了「口不對心」的矛盾。

    上述貌似「行禮如儀」的社交互動行為隨著訊息事件的種類而變化,行動意涵亦不停流動、轉變,逐漸成為眾人心照不宣的隱藏邏輯,內化成為使用者的行動策略。成為具有「僵固的儀式形式,多元流動的儀式意義」的互動行為,亦可作為網路世代專屬的行動符號。
    Social network sites, such as Facebook, enable users to interact with friends and maintain their relationship. The growing scope and scale of social network require users to cope with huge numbers of friends in formulated and standardized ways. These formulated actions practiced repeatedly on Facebook have become ritualized and thus shape the particular cultural landscape. However, these interaction actions gradually become alienated from original social intents. Facebook users tend to push “Like” bottom whenever they read friends’ news updates, but they just go through the motion without any meaning.

    This particular research applies sociologist Goffman’s interaction ritual theory and Collin’s interaction ritual chain theory to the context of Facebook behavior. The researcher attempts to answer 2 questions: 1. What a complete social interaction ritual chain would be like on Facebook? And what are its ritual ingredients and outcomes? 2. Does social interaction behavior mismatch its social intent? If the gap exists, why does it happen? This research collects data from researcher’s 750 friends’ information in time frame from March 2013 to April 2013. Four Facebook events are chosen as critical cases. Content analysis and deep interview are employed to discover the ingredients, process and outcomes of interaction ritual chains and every detail on Facebook.

    The result indicates it’s highly possible that every social information event would develop a complete interaction ritual chain. But the difference of event characters may have impacts on people’s forms of participation. Secondly, Facebook users often depreciate the meaning of “Like”, however “Like” turns out to show multiple meanings. Whenever Facebook users’ physical action couldn’t match attempts, “Like” would serve as the buffer solving the inconsistency. Finally, pushing “Like” bottom becomes “formulated but with multiple meanings”, and it also becomes exclusive action symbol of Facebook generation.
    Reference: Jennifer(2012.04.20)。〈為什麼你 84% 的 Facebook 粉絲都神秘失蹤了?〉。上網日期:2012年04月20日,取自http://techorange.com/2012/04/20/facebook-edgerank-what-you-need-to-know-infographic/

    尤芷芸(2009)。《線上社交網站之媒介溝通經驗研究》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。

    伊海宇譯(1990)。《1844年經濟學哲學手稿》。台北:時報。(原書Marx, Karl [1844]. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Prometheus Books.)

    吳姝蒨(1996)。《電腦中界傳播人際情感親密關係之研究─探訪電子布告欄中的「虛擬人際關係」》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。

    吳櫂銓(2011.12)。〈網路輿論平台與影響─以臉書互動現象為例〉,「2011年台灣社會學會年會」論文。台灣,台北。.

    李芳齡譯(2011)。《 Facebook臉書效應:從0到7億的串連》。台北:天下雜誌。(原書Kirkpatrick, David [2011]. The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the company That is Connecting the World. New York : Simon & Schuster.)

    李珞(2011.03.01)。〈我得了臉書上癮症 不玩,會很癢?!〉。上網日期:2011年3月1日,取自http://ideas.org.tw/magazine_article.php?f=321

    祁立峰(2012.10.14)。〈人生進行事-臉書病〉。上網日期:2012年10月14日,取自http://news.chinatimes.com/reading/11051301/112012101400074.html

    林意仁(2011)。《網路群眾文化及其民主意涵─以PTT Gossiping看板為例》。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

    林聚任、王鵬、宋麗君譯(2009)。《互動儀式鍊》。北京:商務印書館。(原書Collins, Randall [2004]. Interation Ritual Chains. Princeton University Press.)

    芮傳明、趙學元譯(1992)。《宗教生活的基本形式》。台北:桂冠。(原書Durkheim, Emile [1915]. The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.)

    紀佩君(2008)。《網路世界中的展演儀式:網路聊天室的對話分析》。私立南華大學應用社會學系社會學碩士碩士論文。

    徐江敏、李姚軍譯(1992)。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北:桂冠。(原書Goffman, Erving [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor.)

    徐國峰(2004.12)。〈媒體儀式中的棒球想像─以中華職棒大聯盟球迷為例〉,「疆界/將屆2004年文化研究學生研討會」論文。台灣,新竹。

    張璇(2012.05.23)。〈低頭族 更寂寞〉,《自由時報》(副刊)。

    張玉萍、張旭東、李楊(2009)。〈文化大革命中政治儀式的失靈〉,《湖南科技大學學報(社會科學版)》,12(6)。

    許慈雅(2011)。《社交網站與組織內人際關係改變之關聯性研究─以Facebook為例》。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班論文。

    陳家銘(2011)。《微網誌上的溝通互動與人際關係─以Plurk為例》。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

    曾武清(2004)。《網路媒介與集體記憶:從台灣棒球史中的「龍魂不滅」談起》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。

    黃厚銘(2000)。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉,《台大社會學刊》,Vol.0(No.28): 117-154。

    黃厚銘(2001)。《虛擬社區中的身份認同與信任》。國立台灣大學社會學研究所博士論文。

    黃厚銘(2002)。〈網路上探索自我認同的遊戲〉,《教育與社會研究》,第三期(No.5): 65-106。

    黃薇菁譯(2011)。《150法則:從演化角度解密人類的社會行為》。台北:商周。(原書Dunbar, Robin [2010]. How many friends does one person need?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.)

    彭樹君(2012.11.28)。〈About Facebook/讚〉,《聯合報》(聯合副刊),D3版。

    劉一賜(2011.11.04)。〈社群啟示錄:分享氾濫?資訊超載!〉。上網日期:2011年11月4日,取自http://ideas.org.tw/magazine_article.php?f=79

    蔣昕(2010)。《臉書上的一張臉譜:社交網站上的劃界與展演》。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。

    鄭國威(2005)。〈Blog, Research, and Beyond〉,《網路社會學通訊期刊》,第45期。

    譚天、吳佳真譯(1998)。《虛擬化身:網路世代的身分認同》。台北:遠流。(原書Turkle, Sherry [1997]. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York : Simon & Schuster.)

    Baehr, P. (2005). Social extremity, communities of fate, and the sociology of SARS. European Journal of Sociology, 46(02), 179-211.

    Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

    Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6(5), 178-190.

    Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

    Gladwell, M. (2010.10.04). Small Change-Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker.

    Goffman, E. (1982). Interaction Ritual. Pantheon Books.

    Gonçalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2011.08). Modeling Users` Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar`s Number. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e22656.

    Goncalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2011.06). Validation of Dunbar`s number in Twitter conversations. Paper presented at the The International School and Conference on Network Science (NetSci 2011), Hungary: Budapest.

    Gramsci, A. (1983). The modern prince, and other writings. New York: International Publishers.

    Marwick, A. E. & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13, 96-113.

    Ling, R. S. (2008). New Tech, New Ties : How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion: MIT Press.

    Litt , Eden (2012.05). Knock, Knock. Who`s There? The Imagined Audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345

    Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart : how to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Rutter, J., & Smith, G. (1999). Spinning Threads: Rituals of Sociability in CMC. Paper presented at ESRC Virtual Methods Seminar Series. .

    Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.

    Zhang, Y. (2005.08). The Failure of Political Rituals in China`s Cultural Revolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Marriott Hotel, Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

    Zuckerberg, M. (2012.10.04). One Billion People on Facebook. Retrieved March 1, 2013, from http://newsroom.fb.com/News/457/One-Billion-People-on-Facebook
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    100451011
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100451011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101101.pdf1920KbAdobe PDF2332View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback