English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 111300/142216 (78%)
造訪人次 : 48315692      線上人數 : 681
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/59705
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59705


    題名: 情緒激發對訓練成效之影響:知覺訓練難度的調節效果
    The influences of emotional arousal on training outcomes: The moderating effects of perceived training difficulty
    作者: 蕭佳佩
    貢獻者: 陳彰儀
    蕭佳佩
    關鍵詞: 情緒激發
    知覺訓練難度
    自我效能
    學習動機
    訓練有用性
    訓練學習結果
    emotional arousal
    perceived training difficulty
    self-efficacy
    motivation to learn
    utility judgment
    learning outcome
    日期: 2009
    上傳時間: 2013-09-03 13:27:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究探討訓練情境中的情緒激發與知覺訓練難度對訓練成效之影響。本研究使用實驗法,採3(情緒激發:正向、負向、無激發)×2(知覺訓練難度:簡單與困難)完全受試者間設計,依變項為受訓者的自我效能、學習動機、訓練有用性與訓練學習結果。受試者為國立政治大學的127名大學生,受試者隨機分派到六種實驗情境之一,在實驗室中依序進行情緒激發作業、訓練作業,最後填寫研究問卷。本研究以變異數分析(ANOVA)與共變數分析(ANCOVA)(控制性別之影響)來檢驗情緒激發與知覺訓練難度對各依變項之影響。研究結果顯示情緒激發與知覺訓練難度之交互作用會影響受訓者的自我效能與學習動機。最後,本研究針對研究結果進行討論、並對研究限制、未來研究方向、理論與實務意涵加以闡述。
    This study focuses on the effect of emotional arousal and perceived training difficulty on training outcomes. A 3 (emotional arousal: positive, negative, control) x 2 (perceived training difficulty: easy, difficult) between-subject experimental design is used. The dependent variables are trainees’ self-efficacy, motivation to learn, utility judgment and learning outcome. Subjects (N=127) were randomly assigned to one of the six experimental situations and completed the emotional arousal task, training task, and research questionnaire in order. The researcher uses ANOVA and ANCOVA (controlling the gender effect) to examine the influence of emotional arousal and perceived training difficulty on each dependent variable separately. The results of the present study indicate that trainees’ self-efficacy and motivation to learn can be influenced by the interaction of emotion arousal and perceived training difficulty. At last, the results, limitation, further research directions and implications are discussed.
    參考文獻: 中文部份
    吳明隆 (2007)。SPSS操作與應用—問卷統計分析實務。台北市:五南
    行政院經濟建設委員 (2003)。因應知識經濟時代強化人力資本角色之研究。
    張曉文 (2003)。組織情境因素對員工訓練學習暨遷移動機影響之探討,未出版碩士論文,國立中央大學,中壢市。
    黃郁雯 (2003)。電腦自我效能、電腦經驗及他人支持三者與電腦態度及電腦焦慮之關係,未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,台北市。 
    趙小瑩、王文中、葉寶專(2007)。正負向情感及身體激起量表之發展與試題反應分析:焦慮症與憂鬱症三角模式的再探討。測驗學刊,54(1),223-257,
    簡貞玉 (譯)(2007)。員工訓練與能力發展(Noe , R. A., 2004)。台北市:麥格羅希爾
    英文部分
    Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474.
    Alliger, G., & Janak, E. (1989). Kirkpatrick`s levels of training criteria: Thirty years later. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 331-342.
    Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W. Jr., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341–358.
    American Society for Training and Development. (2009). The 2009 State of Industry Report. Retrieved March, 23, 2010, from American Society for Training and Development website: http://www.astd.org/content/research/researchReports/
    Arthur, W. Jr., Bennett, W. Jr., Edens, P. S., & Bell S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of Training in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis of Design and Evaluation Features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234-245.
    Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (l988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41 (1), 63-106.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729-735.
    Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., & Roberson, L. (1995). Cookies, disposition, and job attitudes: The effects of positive mood-inducing events and negative affectivity on job satisfaction in a field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 55-62.
    Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002), Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Work Place. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279-307.
    Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
    Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117–35.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
    Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.
    George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.
    George, J., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don`t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697.
    Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
    Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect and creativity. In S. Russ (Ed.), Affect, Creative Experience, and Psychological Adjustment ( pp. 3–17). Philadelphia: Bruner/Mazel.
    Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 80-105.
    Kavanagh, D. J., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Mood and self-efficacy: Impact of joy and sadness on perceived capabilities. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 507–525.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training and Development, 13, 3–9.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). Evaluation of training. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (pp. 301–319). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1993). Making it all worker-friendly. Fortune, 128(7), 44-53.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Invited reaction: Reaction to Holton article. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 23–25.
    Kraiger, K., Billings, R. S., & Isen, A. M. (1989).The influence of positive affective states on task perceptions and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(1), 12-25.
    Krohne, H. W., Pieper, W., Knoll, N., & Breimer, N. (2002). The cognitive regulation of emotions: The role of success versus failure experience and coping dispositions. Cognition and Emotion, 16(2), 217-243.
    LaPorte, R. E., & Nath, R. (1976). Role of performance goals in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 260-264.
    Larsen, R., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(1), 1-39.
    LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory, and the brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50-57.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
    Locke, E. A., Motowidlo, S., & Bobko, P. (1986). Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 328–338.
    Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home: The contributions of work and non-work creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767.
    Mager, R. F. (1992). No self-efficacy, no performance. Training, 29(4), 32-36.
    Martin, L. L., & Stoner, P. (1996). Mood as input: What we think about how we feel determines how we think. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self regulation (pp. 279–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107-114.
    Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39(3), 497-523.
    Parrott, W. G., & Hertel, P. (1999). Research methods in cognition and emotion. In T. Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp61-81). Chichester, England: Wiley& Sons Ltd.
    Ruona, W. E. A., Leimbach, M., Holton, E. F., & Bates, R. (2002). The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 218-228.
    Saavedra, R. & Earley, P. C. (1991). Choice of task and goal under conditions of general and specific affective inducement. Motivation and Emotion, 15(1), 45-65.
    Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
    Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55-71). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
    Staw, B. M., & Barsade, S. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly , 38, 304 - 31.
    Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., & Pelled, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organization Science, 5, 51–71.
    Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 399-441.
    Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin,103(2), 193-210.
    Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570-1583
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
    Weitz, J. (1966). Criteria and transfer of training, Psychological Reports, 19, 195-210.
    Wright, J., & Mischel, W. (1982). Influence of affect on cognitive social learning person variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43, 901–914.
    Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favorable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–23.
    Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 591–632). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    97752014
    98
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097752014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    201401.pdf840KbAdobe PDF2506檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋