English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110180/141113 (78%)
Visitors : 46573730      Online Users : 164
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59824


    Title: 住宅市場從眾行為與總體經濟因素之研究
    Macroeconomic Factors and the Herd Behavior in the Residential Real Estate Markets
    Authors: 程于芳
    Cheng,yu fang
    Contributors: 林左裕
    Lin,tsoyu calvin
    程于芳
    Cheng,yu fang
    Keywords: 從眾行為
    持有成本
    交易量波動
    自我迴歸分配落遲模型
    herding
    user cost of housing
    transaction volatility
    ARDL model
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2013-09-03 14:52:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 傳統財務理論中均假設市場為效率市場,然而不動產市場並非效率市場,投資者對於市場資訊之反應並非完全理性。若投資者忽視自身擁有之資訊,選擇追隨其他人的投資決策,將使投資人間存在相互牽制之行為,因而產生行為財務學中之「從眾行為」,其決策結果將無法完全反應市場資訊,並造成投資人集體買進、賣出之行為,使市場價格與交易量存在不正常之波動。由於台灣不動產市場長期以來存在有價格漲幅波動超越合理範圍之現象,因此本研究探討台灣不動產市場是否存有從眾行為,使得投資人具有非理性的投資傾向。
    有鑑於過去關於從眾行為之研究仍以股票市場中報酬率或交易量驗證為主,對於台灣運用交易量進行不動產市場之從眾行為驗證則付之闕如,而從眾行為對於不動產市場之影響,首先將反映於交易量之波動,因此本研究運用自我迴歸分配落遲模型對於台灣不動產市場是否存在從眾行為進行驗證,並比較不動產報酬率波動不同之交易市場,其從眾行為存在情形之異同。
    模型結果顯示台灣三大都會區(臺北市、臺中市與高雄市)與臺北市分區(分為市中心、郊區與郊外)中,僅臺北市整體與臺北市分區之住宅市場明顯存在從眾行為現象。結果顯示當該住宅市場存在從眾行為時,當期交易量將受到當期持有成本與前期市場報酬率之影響。此外,交易量除受從眾行為之影響外,尚受到經濟成長率、營建類股股價指數、物價指數租金年增率、營造工程物價指數等之正向影響,而購屋貸款利率與通貨膨脹則和交易量呈反向變動現象。
    本研究以探討從眾行為、交易量與總體經濟因素之關連性,進一步釐清影響住宅市場交易量波動之因素,使購屋者於決策時參考前期市場交易情形能更加理性,避免盲目跟隨下的從眾行為產生。
    Base on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, the traditional financial theory assumes the market is efficient. However, the real estate market is not. For this reason, investors could not react to market information entirely. If investors ignore their own information, they may choose to follow other peoples’ investment decisions. Therefore, this situation will lead to herding behavior of behavioral finance that may cause price volatility and unusual transactions. On account of the real estate market exists unreasonable price fluctuations for a long time in Taiwan, this thesis examines whether the herding behavior exists in Taiwan real estate market or not.
    Although many researchers study the herding behavior in the stock market by using the transactions and the returns on investment, few attempts have been made to discuss the herding behavior in Taiwan housing market by using the housing transactions. Hence, this study examines the herding behavior in Taiwan housing market by establishing the Auto-regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model with housing transaction data.
    Results found the herding behavior of real estate market do exist in the whole Taipei city and the three region of Taipei city (downtown, suburb and outskirt). And it shows the transactions in the housing market with herding behavior may be affected by user cost of housing and pre-market returns. Furthermore, the study finds some macroeconomic factors affecting the housing transactions positivity, such as economic growth rate, construction stocks index, consumer price index of house renting and consumer price index of construction engineering. On the contrary, loan interest rate of housing and consumer price index has negative influence.
    To conclude, this study aims to examine the influential factors on the volatility of housing transactions though clarifying the relationship between the herding behavior, the transactions in housing market and the macroeconomic factors. It may help investors follow other peoples’ investment decisions more reasonable, and avoid blind herding behavior in real estate markets.
    Reference: Acemoglu, D. (1993). Learning about others’ actions and the investment accelerator,Economic Journal, 103, 318-328.
    Admati, A, and P. Pfleiderer. (1988).A theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability. Review of Finance Studies,1(1),3-40.
    Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. Groups, leadership, and men, 177-190.
    Baddeley, M.C(2005).Housing bubbles, herdingings and frenzies: evidence from British housing markets.CEPP , University of Cambridge,1-32.
    Banerjee, A. V.(1992).A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics,CVII(3),790-817.
    Bikchandani, S, D.Hirshleifer and I. Welch (1992). A Theory of Fad, Fashion, Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5),992-1026.
    Bikhchandani, S., and S. Sharma ( 2000). IMF Working Papers ,International Monetary Fund, 47(3), 279-307.
    Chang, Eric C.,Joseph W. Cheng and Ajay Khorana(2000), An Examination of Herd Behavior in Equity Markets: An International Perspective .Journal of Banking and Finance,24(10),1651-1679.
    Christie, W. G. and Huang, R. D.,(1995),Following the pied piper: Do individual returns herd around the market?, Financial Analysts Journal,No.51:31–37.
    Chowdhry ,B. and Nanda,V.(1991).Multimarket Trading and Market Liquidity. Review of Financial Studies,4(3),483-511.
    Darrat, A. F. and J. L. Glasock(1993) On the real estate market efficiency. Journal of Real Finance Economics,7,55-72.
    Devenow, A. and I. Welch (1996).Rational herding in financial economics.European Economic Review ,40, 603-615.
    Enders, W.(2004).Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Willey
    & Sons, Inc .
    Falkenstein, E. G. (1996). Preferences for stock characteristics as
    revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings, Journal of Finance, 51,
    111-135.
    Fortura, P. and J. Kushner (1986). Canadian Inter-City House Price
    Differentials. Real Estate Economics, 14(4), 525-536.
    Froot, K. A., Scharfstein , D.S. and Steinet, J.C.(1992). Herd on the Street: Informational Inefficiencies in a Market with Short-Term Speculation, Journal of Finance, 47, 1461-1484.
    Graham, J.(1999).Herding among investment newsletters: Theory and evidence,Journal of Finance 54, 237-268.
    Hwang, S. and M. Salmon(2004).Market Stress and Herding.Journal of Empirical Finance,11(4),585-616.
    Jorgenson, D.W.(1963).Capital Theory and Investment Behaviour. American Economic Review, 53, 247-59.
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 313-327.
    Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Interest, Employment and Money. Macmillan, London.
    Kmenta, J. (1996). Elements of econometrics .2nd ed.. Macmillan, New York.
    Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, 1992, The impact of
    institutional trading on stock prices, Journal of Financial
    Economics ,32, 23-43.
    McCue, Thomas E., and John L. Kling. (1994).Real estate returns and the macroeconomy: Some empirical evidence from real estate investment trust data.Journal of Real Estate Research ,9,277-287.
    James, Montier, (2002).Behavioural Finance: Insights into Irrational Minds and Markets, John Willey & Sons Ltd.
    Odean, T.(1998). Are investors reluctant to realise their losses. Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.
    Scharfstein, D.S. and J.C. Stein (1990). Herd Behaviour and Investment. American Economic Review, 80(3), 465-79.
    Shiller, R. J. (1984).Stock prices and social dynamics. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 457-498.
    Simon, H. A. (1982).Models of bounded rationality.Behavioral Economics and Business Organization, The MIT Press, vol.2, Cambridge: MA.
    Topol, R.(1991).Bubbles and volatility of stock prices: effect of mimetic
    contagion.Economic Journal, 101,786-800.
    Wermers, R.(1999). Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices, Journal of Finance, 54, 581-622.
    江宏儒(2002),股票市場從眾行為之探討:新興市場與已開發國家之比較,高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文
    江明宜(1997) ,營建類股價及其影響因素波動關係之研究-誤差修正模型之應用,政治大學地政研究所碩士論文
    吳森田(1994),所得、貨幣與房價—近二十年來臺北地區的觀察,住宅學報,第
    2卷,頁49-66
    易丹輝(2008),數據分析與Eviews應用,中國人民大學出版社
    林秋瑾、黃珮玲(1995),住宅價格與總體經濟變數關係之研究—以向量自我迴歸
    模式(VAR)進行實證分析,政治大學學報,第71期,頁143-159
    林秋瑾、王健安、張金鶚(1996),房地產景氣與總體經濟景氣於時間上領先、同
    時、落後關係之探討,國科會人文及社會科學彙刊,第7卷,第1期,頁35-56
    洪來發(2004),行為財務學財務管理之心理學取向,華立圖書
    洪裕勝、曾榮騰(2008),權益型REITs市場的從眾行為現象_以NYSE市場為例,
    2008年企業管理暨經營決策學術研討會
    張金鶚、陳明吉、鄧筱蓉、楊智元(2008),臺北市房價泡沫知多少?-房價、租
    金、所得之關係與狀態空間模型之應用,世界華人不動產學會成立大會暨產
    業與學術研討會,上海,中國
    陳明吉(1989),房地產價格及其變動因素之研究,政治大學地政學系研究所碩士
    論文
    陳明吉、曾婉婷 (2008),台灣不動產市場從眾行為之檢視,管理與系統,第15\\
    卷,第4期,頁591-615
    許淑媛與張金鶚(2008),住宅個案價格分散之時空影響,2008 年中華民國住宅學會年會論文。
    傅舒妙(1989),臺北都會區住宅價格影響因素探討」,碩士論文,國立中興大學
    經濟研究所碩士論文
    彭建文與張金鶚(2000),預期景氣與宣告效果對房地產景氣之影響,管理學報,第17卷,第2期,頁343-368
    曾建穎、張金鶚、花敬群(2006),不同空間、時間住宅租金與其房價關聯性之研究-臺北地區之實證現象分析,住宅學報,第14卷,第2期,頁27-49
    楊奕農(2008),時間序列分析--經濟與財務上之應用,雙葉出版社
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    97257002
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0972570021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    002101.pdf1254KbAdobe PDF2565View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback