Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60138
|
| Title: | 網路社群中的無償虛擬團隊文化與互動型態： 以字幕組為例
Voluntary virtual teams’ interaction styles in online communities :an example of the subtitle teams |
| Authors: | 陳竹蕾
Chen, Julie |
| Contributors: | 許瓊文
Hsu, Julia
陳竹蕾
Chen, Julie |
| Keywords: | 字幕組
虛擬團隊
無償勞動
網路社群
Subtitle Teams
online communities.
Virtual Teams
Voluntary work |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-09-04 16:16:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 網路社群中的字幕組，是由一群無償勞動的網友們、透過新科技溝通媒介而組織起來的。在本研究中，筆者將字幕組視為一個虛擬團隊，意圖探討無償虛擬團隊的組織文化與互動方式。近年來，國內的虛擬團隊研究觀點，似乎較偏向學校或者企業，所設定的虛擬團隊也清一色是營利組織或者學校體制內的虛擬團隊。然而，字幕組的工作卻是無償無薪，也缺乏外在的企業體制。
無償的虛擬團隊與營利組織裡的虛擬團隊有何差異呢？網路社群中的P2P資源交換特性或者網路社群中的生態，是否也會影響到字幕組這樣的無償虛擬團隊？本研究採取Potter與Balthazard（2002）所整理出之團隊「互動型態」理論、Dani 與Burns等人（2006）的「組織文化類型」理論，試圖找出不同規模與文化情境的字幕組互動型態、組織文化類型。筆者觀察了數個中國與台灣的字幕組，期望找出具集體知識共作、創造特性的虛擬團隊特色。而這些特色，或許能啟發國內其餘具知識分享、文化創造性質的虛擬團隊。
本研究使用參與觀察、親身實作等方法進行，輔以筆者自身的中國字幕組經驗與其他台灣字幕組成員的深度訪談，同步進行書寫。
研究結果顯示，字幕組的組織文化偏向關係親密的「宗族文化」、以及具有創新特質的「鬆散彈性文化」。而針對字幕組的互動型態分析，則集中於「合作型」、「人際型」，同樣都是關係較親近、競爭壓力較少的互動類型。這些特質顯示出，字幕組這樣的無償虛擬團隊，的確在組織文化、互動風格方面，都有著與企業不同的組織屬性。
The Subtitle Teams in online communities are formed by volunteers who communicate by virtual technology. This study views the Subtitle Teams as virtual teams, in order to explore their organizational culture and interaction style. In recent years, most Virtual Teams studies in Taiwan focus on teams in school and businesses industries, however, the Subtitle Teams are volunteers without business structure.
What is the difference between commercial virtual teams and voluntary subtitle teams? Do P2P communities influence voluntary subtitle teams like Subtitle Teams? We use Potter & Balthazard (2002)’s Interaction Style theory and Dani & Burn(2006)’s Organization Culture Types to explore the traits of Subtitle Teams. The Subtitle Teams in this study includes culture difference between Taiwan and Chinese, also the difference between Drama Subtitle Teams and Animation Subtitle Teams.
The goal of this study is to find out some trait of creative, knowledge-based, and cooperative virtual teams, hope these result will help other virtual teams in NPO organizations or Cultural Industry in Taiwan.
This study use participant observation, in-depth interviewing and case study to view the experience of the members from four Subtitle Teams.
We found out that the Subtitle Team’s Organization Culture might tend to be The Clan Culture and The Adhocracy Culture. As to the Interaction Style analysis, many subtitle teams tend to be Passive Style and Constructive Style at the same time at the same time. |
| Reference: | 人人影視維基百科（2009.03.19），中国字幕组以及YYeTs字幕组的历史简介，取自：http://wiki.yyets.net/doku.php?id=yyets:about
何嘉惠、陳寬裕、林純純（2005）。〈以競局理論分析競合環境之資源分享〉。
經營管理論叢 ，一卷一期， 1-15。
何駿才（2003），《領導者角色扮演對虛擬團隊績效影響之研究》，中山大學管理研究所碩士論文。
田靜婷、黃慧瑛（2006.03）〈探討團隊之互動型態對企業家精神導向之影響：以人力資源管理活動為干擾變數〉，「2006工研院創新與科技管理研討會」論文。中華民國，台中。Issue Date: 03-10-2006
吳姿嫻（2009），《想像、追隨、盜獵：以字幕組為例》，政治大學新聞所碩士論文。
周治宏（2010.03.23），〈揭秘字幕組之間的戰爭：為搶首發幾十人輪值〉，《北京晨報》，取自：http://news.mydrivers.com/1/159/159281.htm
胡幼慧（2005）。 〈質性研究的分析與寫成〉，胡幼慧（編）《質性研究：理論
方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁195-221。台北，巨流。
胡綺珍（2009）。〈中國字幕組與新自由主義的工作倫理〉，《新聞學研究》，101：177-214。
郭建志（2003），〈組織文化研究之回顧與前瞻〉，《應用心理研究》，20：83-114。
陳向明（2009）〈訪談：我如何瞭解被研究者的所思所想？〉，黃淑貞（編），頁221-243。《社會科學質的研究》，台北，五南。
陳竹蕾（2009.07）。〈從Prosumer到Prosumers：論虛擬團體動力學觀點下的網路字幕組集結過程〉，「2009中華傳播年會」壁報論文。中華民國，新竹。
陳竹蕾（2009.11）。〈競合觀點中的「互補者」角色：P2P社群中的字幕組現象初探〉，「2009台灣藝術大學飆心立藝研討會」論文。中華民國，台北。
字幕組(民國98年)。維基百科。民98年1月1日，
取自：http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%AD%97%E5%B9%95%E7%B5%84&variant=zh-tw
戴震東（2006.05.14），〈美劇字幕組：這些活，都是我們幹的〉，《星期日新聞晨報》，取自：http://www.highai.com/gb/xwb/sunday/wenhua/userobject1ai1261637.html
顏國洲（2005）。《虛擬團隊信任關係形成之研究---以明基手機研發團隊為例》，交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
嚴祥鸞（2005）。 〈參與觀察法〉，胡幼慧（編）《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁195-221。台北，巨流。
scofield（2009.12.28），〈BT網站已死，字幕組將如何生存呢？〉，上網日期：2009年12月28日。取自：http://www.gosoa.com.cn/bt网站已死，字幕组将如何生存呢？/
Ancona, D.C., & Caldwell D.F. (1992) . Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(4) , 634-665
Babbie, E. (2001) . The practice of social research. 9th (Eds.), CA: Wadsworth.
Boehm, D., & Aniola-Jedrzejek, L. (2006). Seven principles of good practice for virtual international collaboration. In Ferris, S.P. & Godar S.(Ed.) Teaching and Learing with Virtual Teams (pp.1-32). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The Managerial Grid. Houston: Gulf
Publishing.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, based on the competing values framework. Massachusett: John Wiley & Sons Publishing.
Campion, M.A., & Medsker, G. J. (1993).Relations between work group characteristivs and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Persnnoel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
Chen, J. , Xu, H. & Whinston A. B. (2009).Moderated online communities and user-generated content. The Networks, Electronic Commerce, and Telecommunications Institute, New York University, New York.
Cooke, R. A. , & Szumal J. L. (1994).The impact of group Interaction style on problem solving effectiveness, Journal of Applied Behavioal Science, 30(4), 415-437.
Dagiral, E., & Dauphin, F. (2005). P2P: From file sharing to meta-information pooling. Communication &Strategies, 59(3), 35-.51
Dani S.S., Burns N.D., Backhouse C.J., & Kochhar A.K. (2006). The implications of organizational culture and trust in the working of virtual teams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 220( 6), 951-960.
Davidow, W., & Malone, M. (1992). The virtual corporation. New York: HarperCollins.
Dejean, S., Penard T., &Suire R. (2008) .Olson`s paradox revisited: An empirical analysis of file-sharing behaviour in P2P communities. Université de RennesI: Rennes.
Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and
leadership. Organization Science, 6 (5), 524-540.
du Toit, H. , & van Petegem, P. (2006). Learning style flexibility for effective virtual teams. In Ferris, S.P. & Godar S.(Ed.) Teaching and Learing with Virtual Teams (pp.32-52). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-377). London: Sage.
Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H. (2003). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp.61-106), London: Sage.
Freeman, R. B. (1997). Working for nothing: The supply of volunteer Labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), 140-66.
Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
Gu, B., Huang, Y., Duan, W. & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Online peer-to-peer communities: An empirical investigation of a music sharing community as a dynamic two-sided network. NET Institute Working Paper, 42(7), 1-37.
Lipnack, J., & J. Stamps (1997), Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. NY:John Wiley& Sons, Inc.
John Wiley & Sons, NY.March, J. and H. Simon (1958), Organizations. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Joshi, A. (2006). The influence of organizational demography on the external networking behavior of teams. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 583–595.
Krishnan, R. ,Smith, M., & Telang R. (2003). The economics of peer-to-peer networks. Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania .
Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gift and public goods in cyberspace. In Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (Ed.),Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220-242). London: Routledge.
Maier, N.R.F. (1963), Problem-solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 轉引自Potter, R.E., & Balthazard, P.A.(2002),Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56( 4), 423-443.
Maier, N.R.F. (1967). Assets and liabilities in group problem-solving: the need for an integrative function, Psychological Review, 74, 239-49. 轉引自Potter, R.E., & Balthazard, P.A.(2002). Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(4), 423-443.
McDonald, T. (1995), Brain trust: A new corporate climate favors loose, flexible, idea-based teams. Successful Meetings. 44(1), 16-27.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? . Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9 –31.
McKenna, K., & Seidman, G. ( 2002).Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics, 6, 116-127.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 18(3), 62-73.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210 –227.
Nemiro, J. (2004). Creativity in virtual teams: Key components for success. Indianapolis; Pfeiffer.
Nickerson, D. W. (2007). Quality is job one: Volunteer and professional phone calls. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 269-282.
O’Hara-Devereaux, M., & Johanshen, R. (1994). Global work: Bridging distance, culture, and time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M-H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31, 569-582.
O’Reilly, C.A., Caldwell D.F.,& Barnett W.P. (1989), Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.
Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. (2007). Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(6), 336-350.
Pastmaster & Decair, G. (1997), Smilies unlimited, Retrieved January 22, 2008, from http://www.czweb.com/smilies.htm.
Potter, R.E., Balthazard P.A., & Cooke R.A.(2000).Virtual team interaction:assessment,consequences, andmanagement. Team Performance Management: An International Journal. 6(7/8), 131-137.
Potter, R.E., & Balthazard P.A. (2002). Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(4), 423-443.
Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in on-line communities: determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information Technology. 20(5), 347–356.
Reicher, S. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioral effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology. 23, 341-350.
Schein,E.H. (1993). On dialuge, culture and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 40-51.
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Context of computer-mediated communication (pp. 26 –54). Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Tsui, A.S., Egan, T.D., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
Warkentin, M., & Beranek, P.M.(1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Info Systems, 9, 271-289.
Watson, W. E., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect
group performance on an intellective task. Group & Organization Studies, 13(4),
495-516.
Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass media research: An introduction. CA: Wadsworth.
Wong, S.S., & Burton, R. M. (2000). Virtual teams: What are their characteristics, and impact on team performance?. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6, 339-360.
Xia, M., Huang, Y., Duan, W. ,& Whinston, A. B. (2007). To share or not to share?
An empirical analysis on user decisions in online sharing vommunities. Retrieve February 21, 2009 from
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1028165
Xia, M., Huang, Y., Duan, W., Whinston, A.B. (2007). Voice of the crowd: Ballot Box
Communication in online communities. Forthcoming in Communications of the ACM. Retrieve February 21, 2009 from http://business.illinois.edu/mxia/papers/voice_of_the_crowd.pdf
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
Yin , R.(2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zonabend, F. (1992). The monograph in European ethnology. Current Sociology, 40(1), 49-60. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
廣播電視學研究所
974530108
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097453018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [廣播電視學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 301801.pdf | 1888Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1566 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
