English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48038938      Online Users : 1022
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60510


    Title: 私營標準於WTO下之法律問題研究-以全球良好農業慣例標準(GlobalGAP Standard)為例
    The Legal Analysis of Private Standards under the WTO Agreements—Taking GlobalGAP Standard for Example
    Authors: 張仁憶
    Chang, Jen-Yi
    Contributors: 施文真
    Shih, Wen-Chen
    張仁憶
    Chang, Jen-Yi
    Keywords: 私營標準
    全球良好農業慣例標準
    食品衛生檢驗與動植物檢疫措施協定
    技術性貿易障礙協定
    關稅及貿易總協定
    Private Standards
    GlobalGAP Standard
    SPS Agreement
    TBT Agreement
    GATT
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2013-09-05 16:46:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,由於消費者對於產品安全的重視程度與日俱增,各式各樣的私營標準開始蓬勃發展。這些私營標準雖不具備法律強制力,其所導致的市場排擠效應仍使生產者不得不積極使其產品取得各項私營標準的認證,引發私營標準是否具有實質上強制力並進而影響國際間自由貿易之疑慮。隨著開發中國家自2005年開始於SPS委員會中提出全球良好農業慣例標準對國際自由貿易之負面影響,私營標準之相關法律議題於WTO場域中益發重要,實有研究討論之必要。鑒於私營標準種類、數量之眾,本論文以於WTO下被具體指謫之全球良好農業慣例標準為例,探討全球良好農業慣例標準是否有落入WTO法規範管轄範疇之可能,並透過涉及私營標準議題之食品衛生檢驗與動植物檢疫措施協定、技術性貿易障礙協定與關稅及貿易總協定相關條文的解釋與分析,討論全球良好農業慣例標準與該些規範之關連性及適法性,既而於WTO下甚至WTO以外之國際場域,探究尋求相關貿易衝擊因應之道的可行性,希冀能為私營標準對國際自由貿易體系所帶來的影響及其與WTO之關係進行審視並作出建議。
    In recent years, all kinds of private standards have started to develop prosperously because consumers consider product safety more and more important. Although these private standards are not mandatory, the crowding out effect of markets causing by these standards still makes producers have to achieve relevant certification as far as possible. This situation causes anxiety about the possibility that private standards are de facto mandatory and create trade barriers. While developing countries have stated that GlobalGAP Standard makes bad influence on international trade in the SPS Committees since 2005, the legal issues about private standards become more and more important under WTO regime and need to be studied and discussed. In view of the fact that there are too many kinds of private standards, the thesis takes GlobalGAP Standard for example to discuss whether private standards shall be subject to the rules of WTO Agreements. In order to conduct careful examining and come up with suggestions of the influence on international trade which caused by private standards and the relationship between private standards and WTO, it is necessary to research into the connection between GlobalGAP Standard and WTO rules and the legality of this standard through explaining and analyzing relevant rules which involves the issue of private standards under the SPS Agreement, TBT Agreement, and GATT and to discuss the feasibility of finding the solution to relevant trade impact under WTO regime or other international fields.
    Reference: 中文部分:
    1.牛惠之,「WTO技術性貿易障礙(TBT)協定就安全貿易之適用與限制」,《政大法學評論》,第95期,2007年2月。
    2.江一蘆,「國內推動EUREPGAP制度之認認證制度分析報告」,財團法人全國認證基金會,2007年10月31日。
    3.林彩瑜,「從歐體生技產品爭端之裁決論SPS協定對GMO規範之影響」,《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》,第36卷,第4期,2007年12月。
    4.陳啟民,ISO認證必備手冊,麥可國際出版公司,2006年6月,初版第1刷。
    5.黃立、李貴英、林彩瑜合著,WTO國際貿易法論,元照出版有限公司,2004年10月,三版第4刷。
    6.羅昌發,國際貿易法,元照出版有限公司,2002年2月,初版第4刷。
    英文部分:
    1.Arthur E. Appleton, Supermarket Labels and the TBT Agreement: Mind the GAP, 4 BUS. L. BRIEF: 10 (2007).
    2.Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS139/R, WT/DS142/R (11 Feb. 2000).
    3.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Communication from UNCTAD: Private Sector Standards and Developing Country Exports of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables, WTO DOC. G/SPS/GEN/761 (26 Feb. 07).
    4.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Private Standards and The SPS Agreement, WTO Doc. G/SPS/GEN/746 (24 Jan. 07).
    5.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Summary of The Meeting Held on 29-30 June 2005, WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/37/Rev.1 (18 Aug. 05).
    6.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Summary of The Meeting of 28 February-1 March 2007, WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/44 (30 May, 07).
    7.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Summary of The Meeting of 18-19 October 2007, WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/46 (02 Jan. 08).
    8.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Summary of The Meeting of 24-25 June 2008, WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/51 (27 Aug. 08).
    9.Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Note by The Secretariat: Summary of The Meeting of 25-26 February 2009, WTO Doc. G/SPS/R/54 (28 Apr. 09).
    10.European Communities-Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, Appellate Body Report, WTO Doc. WT/DS135/AB/R (12 Mar. 2001).
    11.European Communities-Measures Affecting The Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS291/R, WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R (29 Sep. 2006).
    12.European Communities-Trade Description of Sardines, Appellate Body Report, WTO Doc. WT/DS231/AB/R (26 Sep. 2002).
    13.European Economic Communities-Restrictions on Imports of Dessert Apples-Complaint by Chile, GATT Doc. L/6491, 36th Supp. B.I.S.D. 93, 18 April 1989 (1990).
    14.GATT Dispute Panel Report on EEC-Measures on Animal Feed Proteins, GATT B.I.S.D. (25th Supp.) (14 Mar.1978).
    15.GATT Dispute Panel Report on Italy-Discrimination Against Imported Agricultural Machinery, GATT B.I.S.D. (7th Supp.) (23 Oct. 1959).
    16.Jan Wouters, Axel Marx, Nicolas Hachez, Food Safety, Private Standards and International Trade Law, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies.
    17.Japan-Measures Affecting Consumer Photographic Film and Paper, WT/DS44/R, 31 March 1998.
    18.Japan-Restrictions on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products, 18 November 1987, GATT Doc. L/6253, 35th Supp. B.I.S.D. 163 (1988).
    19.Japan-Trade in Semi-conductors, GATT Doc. L/6309, 35th Supp. B.I.S.D. 116, 4 May 1988 (1988).
    20.Joost Pauwelyn, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes, EC-Hormones, Australia-Salmons and Japan-Varietals, 2 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: 641(1999).
    21.Kevin C. Kennedy, The GATT-WTO System at Fifty, 16 WIS. INT’L L.J. 421, (1998).
    22.Korea-Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef, WT/DS161 & 169/AB/R, adopted 10 Jan. 2001 (2000).
    23.Report by the Panel on Review Pursuant to Article XVI:5, GATT Doc. L/1160, 9th Supp. B.I.S.D. 188, adopted 24 May 1960 (1961).
    24.Rex J. Zedalis, When Do the Activities of Private Parties Trigger WTO Rules?, 10 J. INT’L ECON. L. 335 (Jun. 2007).
    25.Samir R. Gandhi, Regulating the Use of Voluntary Environmental Standards Within the World Trade Organization Legal Regime: Making a Case for Developing Countries, JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 39(5): 855 (Oct. 2005).
    26.Steven Bernstein, Erin Hannah, Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space, 11 J. INT’L ECON. L. 575 (Sep. 2008).
    27.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Challenges and Opportunities Arising from Privae Standards on Food Safety and Environment for Exporters of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables in Asia: Experiences of Malaysia, Thailand and Viet Nam, United Nations Publication, UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/6 (2007).
    28.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Private-Sector Standards and National Schemes for Good Agricultural Practices─Implications for Exports of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables from sub-Saharan Africa: Experiences of Ghana, Kenya and Uganda, United Nations Publication, UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/13 (2008).
    29.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, The Implications of Private-Sector Standards for Good Agricultural Practices─Exploring Options to Facilitate Market Access for Developing-Country Exporters of Fruit and Vegetables: Experiences of Argentina, Brazil and Costa Rica, United Nations Publication, UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/2 (2007).
    網路資源:
    1.Ahold: http://www.ahold.com/
    2.BRC: http://www.brc.org.uk/
    3.CIES: http://www.ciesnet.com/
    4.GlobalGAP: http://www.globalgap.org/
    5.ISO: http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm
    6.Oxford English Dictionary: http://dictionary.oed.com/
    7.Taylor Shannon International:
    http://www.taylorshannon.com/
    8.WHO: http://www.who.int/en/
    9.WTO: http://www.wto.org/index.htm
    10.台灣農產品安全追溯資訊網:http://taft.coa.gov.tw/。
    11.行政院農委會網站:http://www.coa.gov.tw/。
    12.慧典市場研究報告網,http://big5.hdcmr.com/。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    96351037
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096351037
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    103701.pdf779KbAdobe PDF2778View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback