English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141872 (78%)
Visitors : 47562239      Online Users : 892
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60540


    Title: 有關金融市場的三篇實證研究
    Three empirical essays on financial markets
    Authors: 李淯靖
    Contributors: 郭維裕
    李淯靖
    Keywords: 實證權益存續期間
    外溢效果
    死亡率
    共同因子
    empirical equity duration
    spillover effect
    mortality
    common factor
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-05 16:52:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文是由三篇關於金融市場的實證研究組合而成。第一篇以權益存續期間為主題,主要是利用迴歸模型估計台灣上市產業指數的實證權益存續期間,以探討股票報酬率的利率敏感度。迴歸模型中控制了三個重要的股票風險因子─市場因子、規模因子與價值因子。但其中,我們改以正交市場因子代替市場因子,以避免因為利率變動與市場報酬間存在共線性,而造成權益存續期間有可能錯估的問題。此外,基於權益存續期間具有會隨時間改變的動態特性,本文亦對各產業指數最近一次結構性變化的發生時點進行偵測,並據以推估最近期的權益存續期間。實證結果顯示:除了鋼鐵業的權益存續期間不顯著之外,其他所有產業指數皆具有負的權益存續期間,表示其報酬率與利率變動呈現出正向關係。在程度上,則以營建類指的利率敏感度最大,汽車類指最小。
    第二篇應用了Diebold and Yilmaz (2009)的外溢指標分析台灣上市產業指數間的連動性,其優點是可以瞭解到產業間相互影響的方向以及程度。實證結果顯示:台灣上市產業指數間的外溢程度頗高,並以營建業為最主要的影響者,而相反地,鋼鐵業則是主要的被影響者。外溢指標具有隨時間改變的動態特性,而且透過動態外溢指標可觀察到次貸風暴蔓延的嚴重性。
    第三篇應用了Goyal, Perignon and Villa (2008)所提出的多群組因素分析法,檢測美國總人口死亡率的共同因子個數。該方法最大的優點是能夠有效地辨識出真正的共同因子,避免了一般因素分析容易將解釋能力高的群組內獨特因子誤認為共同因子的缺點。根據檢測結果顯示,美國總人口死亡率的共同因子共有兩個,而且第二個因子的重要性隨時間愈來愈明顯。
    This thesis consists of three empirical essays about financial markets. The first essay analyzes the sensitivity of stock returns to changes in interest rates by estimating empirical equity duration of 18 industrial indices in the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In the regression models, we also control for the market excess return and the Fama-French mimicking returns for size and book-to-market factors. To avoid the effects of the multicolinearity between the market excess return and the interest rate changes, we replace the market excess return by the orthogonalized market factor. In addition, considering the time-varying pattern of empirical equity duration, we further adopt the reversed ordered Cusum test proposed by Pesaran and Timmermann (2002) to identify the most recent break of the regression relationship, and then extract the post-break data to re-estimate the up-to-date empirical equity duration. The result shows that except the Steel index, all industrial indices exhibit significantly negative equity durations, indicating a positive relationship between industrial index returns and interest rate changes in Taiwan. Among them, the Construction index has the largest interest rate sensitivity, while the lowest one is for the Automobile index.
    The second essay focuses on the nature of financial market interdependence, both in terms of returns and returns volatilities. Being capable of identifying the direction and magnitude of linkages among financial markets, the spillover index proposed by Diebold and Yilmaz (2009) is used to measure return and volatility spillovers between the top eight industrial indices based on market value in the Taiwan Stock Exchange. We find that for both returns and volatilities, the spillover effects among industrial indices in Taiwan are substantial. In particular, the Construction index is the major transmitter of shocks to other industries, and the Steel index, in contrast, suffers the most shocks from others. The spillover index fluctuates over time and indeed detects the severity of subprime mortgage crisis.
    The third essay adopts the multigroup factor analysis proposed by Goyal, Perignon and Villa (2008) to estimate the number of common pervasive factors for annual age-specific mortality for the entire U.S. populations. While the standard principal component analysis easily treats any group-specific factor as pervasive one due to its high contribution to total system variance, this methodology is able to estimate the space spanned by common and group-specific pervasive factors and recognize the true common factors. Empirical result shows that there are only two common pervasive factors governing the death rates in the United States; in particular, the importance of the second factor increases over time.
    Reference: Bai, J. and S. Ng (2002), “Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor Models,” Econometrica, 70(1), 191-221.
    Bai, J. and P. Perron (1998), “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes,” Econometrica, 66, 47-78.
    Bai, J. and P. Perron (2003), “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22.
    Bell, W. (1997), “Comparing and Assessing Time Series Methods for Forecasting Age-specific Fertility and Mortality Rates,” Journal of Official Statistics, 13(3), 279-303.
    Booth, H., J. Maindonald, and L. Smith (2002), “Applying Lee-Carter under Conditions of Variable Mortality Decline,” Population Studies, 56, 325-336.
    Brown, R. L., J. Durbin, and J. M. Evans (1975), “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time,” Journal of the Royal Statistical society, Series B 37, 149-192.
    Cairns, A., D. Blake, K. Dowd (2006), “A Two-factor Model for Stochastic Mortality with Parameter Uncertainty: Theory and Calibration,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73(4), 687-718.
    Cairns, A., D. Blake, K. Dowd, G. Coughlan, D. Epstein, A. Ong, and I. Balevich (2009), “A Quantitative Comparison of Stochastic Mortality Models Using Data from England and Wales and the United States,” North American Actuarial Journal, 13(1), 1-35.
    Campbell, J. Y. and J. H. Shiller (1988), “Stock Prices, Earnings, and Expected Dividends,” Journal of Finance, 43, 661-676.
    Casabona, P. A., F. J. Fabozzi, and J. C. Francis (1984), “How to Apply Duration to Equity Analysis,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 10, 52-58.
    Cavaglia, S., C. Brightman, and M. Aked (2000), “The Increasing Importance of Industry Factors,” Financial Analysts Journal, 56(5), 41-54.
    Chamberlain, G. and M. Rothschild (1983), “Arbitrage, Factor Structure and Mean- variance Analysis on Large Asset Markets,” Econometrica, 51(5), 1281-1304.
    Connor, G. (1995), “The Three Types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power,” Financial Analysts Journal, 51(3), 42-46.
    Connor, G. and R. Korajczyk (1986), “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 373-394.
    Connor, G. and R. Korajczyk (1988), “Risk and Return in an Equilibrium APT: Application of a New Test Methodology,” Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 255-289.
    Cornell, B. (2000), “Equity Duration, Growth Options, and Asset Pricing,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 26, 105-111.
    Diebold, F. X. and K. Yilmaz (2009), “Measuring Financial Asset Return and Volatility Spillovers, with Application to Global Equity,” The Economic Journal, 119, 158–171.
    Diebold, F. X. and K. Yilmaz (2010), “Better to Give than to Receive: Predictive Directional Measurement of Volatility Spillover,” International Journal of Forecasting, forthcoming.
    Durbin, J. (1969), “Tests for Serial Correlation in Regression Analysis Based on the Periodogram of Least-Squares Residuals,” Biometrika, 56(1), 1-15.
    Edgerton, D. and C. Wells (1994), “Critical Values for the Cusumsq Statistic in Medium and Large Sized Samples,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 355-365.
    Eleswarapu, V. R. and A. Tiwari (1996), “Business Cycles and Stock Market Returns: Evidence Using Industry-based Portfolios,” The Journal of Financial Research, 19, 121-134.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1988), “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 3-25.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stock and Bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3-56.
    Garman, M.B. and M.J. Klass (1980), “On the Estimation of Security Price Volatilities from Historical Data,” Journal of Business, 53(1), 67-78.
    Girosi, F. and G. King (2007), “Understanding the Lee-Carter Mortality Forecasting Method,” working paper.
    Gould, J. B. and E. H. Sorensen (1986), “Duration: A Factor in Equity Pricing,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 13, 38-43.
    Goyal, A., C. Perignon, and C. Villa (2008), “How Common Are Common Return Factors across the NYSE and Nasdaq,” Journal of Financial Economics, 90, 252-271.
    Grinold, R., A. Rudd, and D. Stefek (1989), “Global factors: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of Portfolio Management, 16(1), 79-88.
    Hayre, L. and H. Chang (1997), “Effective and Empirical Durations of Mortgage Securities,” Journal of Fixed Income, 6, 17-33.
    Heston, S.L. and K.G. Rouwenhourst (1995), “Industry and Country Effects in International Stock Returns,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(3), 53-58.
    Hevert, K. T, R. M. McLaughlin, and R. A. Taggart (1998), “Growth Options and Equity Duration,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 25, 43-50.
    Hong, H., W. Torous, and R. Valkanov (2007), “Do Industries Lead Stock Markets?” Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 367–396.
    Jones, C. (2001), “Extracting Factors from Heteroskedastic Asset Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics 62, 293-325.
    Lee, R. and L. Carter (1992), “Modeling and Forecasting US Mortality,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659-671.
    Lee, R. and T. Miller (2001), “Evaluating the Performance of the Lee-Carter Method for Forecasting Mortality,” Demography, 38(4), 537-549.
    Leibowitz, M. L., E. H. Sorensen, R. D. Arnott, and H. N. Hanson (1989), “A Total Differential Approach to Equity Duration,” Financial Analysts Journal, 45, 30-37.
    Lessard, D.R. (1974), “World, National, and Industry Factors in Equity Returns,” Journal of Finance, 29(2), 379-391.
    Meric, I., M. Ratner, and G. Meric (2008), “Co-movements of Sector Index Returns in the World’s Major Stock Markets in Bull and Bear Markets: Portfolio Diversification Implications,” International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(1), 156-177.
    Moskowitz, T. J. and M. Grinblatt (1999), “Do Industries Explain Momentum?” Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1246-1290.
    Pesaran, H. H. and Y. Shin (1998), “Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models,” Economics Letters, 58, 17-29.
    Pesaran, M. H. and A. Timmermann (2002), “Market Timing and Return Prediction under Model Instability,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 9, 495-510.
    Phylaktis, K. and L. Xia (2006), “The Changing Roles of Industry and Country Effects in the Global Equity Markets,” The European Journal of Finance, 12(8), 627-648.
    Reilly, F. K., D. J. Wright, and R. R. Johnson (2007), “Analysis of the Interest Rate Sensitivity of Common Stocks,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 33, 85-107
    Renshaw, A. and S. Haberman (2003), “Lee-Carter Mortality Forecasting with Age-specific Enhancement,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 255-272.
    Renshaw, A. and S. Haberman (2006), “A Cohort-based Extension to the Lee-Carter Model for Mortality Reduction Factors,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 556-570.
    Sweeney, R. J. and A. D. Warga (1986), “The Pricing of Interest-Rate Risk: Evidence from the Stock Market,” Journal of Finance, 41, 393-410.
    Yang, D. and Q. Zhang (2000), “Drift-Independent Volatility Estimation Based on High, Low, Open, and Close Prices,” Journal of Business, 73(3), 477-491.
    Yang, S.S., J.C. Yue, and H.C. Huang (2010), “Modeling Longevity Risks Using a Principal Component Approach: A Comparison with Existing Stochastic Mortality Models,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46, 254-270.
    Yilmaz, K. (2009), “International Business Cycle Spillovers,” TUSIAD-Koc University Economic Research Forum, working paper.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    94351503
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0943515031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    503101.pdf7257KbAdobe PDF2542View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback