English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109077/140081 (78%)
Visitors : 43353093      Online Users : 788
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60591

    Title: Learning as a Key to Citizen-centred Performance Improvement: A Comparison between the Health Service Centre and the Household Registration Office in Taipei City
    Other Titles: “學習”作為公民為基績效改善之關鍵因素:台北市健康服務中心與戶政事務所之比較研究
    Authors: So, Bennis Wai-Yip
    Contributors: 政大公行系
    Keywords: 台灣;績效改善;組織學習;問責
    Taiwan;performance improvement;organisational learning;accountability
    Date: 2012-06
    Issue Date: 2013-09-09 11:10:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: “學習”作為提升公共響應性、外部問責及績效改善的關鍵因素已被注意到。但學習角色在組織系統中的層級分佈差異會否帶來不同的效果呢?透過台北市兩個前線服務系統及它們績效管理機制之比較研究,本文作者辨識出兩種學習模式:政策性學習及工具性學習,並主張如果由政策制定或上級機關進行政策性學習的話,這會強化對下屬執行機關的垂直問責,但會犧牲外部問責,由此刺激工具性學習。另一方面,如果由績效評估驅動政策性學習,且由執行機關進行這學習的話,那麼就能強化外部問責,但不會對垂直問責造成任何負面影響。
    The function of ‘learning’ as a key to enhancing public responsiveness, outwards accountability and performance improvement has been well identified. But is there any variation in impact if different learning roles are played by people at different levels in organisational hierarchies? Through a comparative study of two frontline service systems and their performance management mechanism in Taipei City of Taiwan, the author identifies two kinds of learning: policy learning and instrumental learning, and argues that if policy learning is taken by a policymaking/supervisory agency, it will strengthen upwards accountability of its subordinate executive agencies at the expense of outwards accountability, and will stimulate their instrumental learning for target-based performance measurement, on the other hand, if policy learning spurred by their own performance evaluation is taken by executive agencies, it will strengthen their outwards accountability without any negative impact on upwards accountability.
    Relation: Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 201-210
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00769.x
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00769.x
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201210.pdf500KbAdobe PDF21311View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback