English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109085/140088 (78%)
Visitors : 43432024      Online Users : 470
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60697


    Title: 考試權獨立機關化定位的新討論:民主責任政治的檢驗
    Other Titles: Re-Examining the Legitimacy of the Examination Yuan as a Constitutionally Independent Power: A Democratic Accountability Test
    Authors: 施能傑
    Shih,N. Jay
    Contributors: 政大公行系
    Keywords: 考試權;權力分立;獨立管制機關;策略性人力資源管理
    examination yuan;separation of powers;independent regulatory agency;strategic human resource management
    Date: 2009-03
    Issue Date: 2013-09-10 14:13:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 考試權目前仍維持六十年前原初的憲法權力獨立組織設計,不僅掌理考試,也負責政府所有人事政策。當臺灣進入民主責任政治和政府競爭力時代,誤解孫中山先生原意的考試權設置,縱使其人事政策品質倘有不佳,卻仍不受政治課責,變成是一個實際的政府民主治理問題。本文主旨是藉由重要理論和比較政府觀點,重新論述考試權目前定位是背離民主責任政治原理,包括採用權力分立理論分析考試不應爲一種憲法權力,以及運用獨立組織設置理論和策略性政府人事政策理論說明考試權不應是獨立性組織,最後並提出修憲途徑和立法調整途徑的變革構想。
    The Examination Yuan as a constitutionally independent power has been in existence for over 60 years. It has the sole power to decide all public personnel policies and regulations for all levels of government. Such an exceptional arrangement, comparatively speaking, has always resulted in many democratic accountability issues. Many critics complain that the Examination Yuan has made public personnel policies so rigid and outdated that it hinders government effectiveness. This paper thus reexamines and rejects the appropriateness of having the Examination Yuan as an independent branch based upon the theories of the separation of powers, independent regulatory agency and strategic human resource management. Finally, both constitutional and law approaches for making dramatic reform are proposed in this paper.
    Relation: 臺灣民主季刊, 6(2), 135-168
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    135-168-a.pdf1324KbAdobe PDF2797View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback