 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46244027
Online Users : 1193
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62370
|
| Title: | 唐君毅的永久和平論—視野與局限 |
| Other Titles: | Tang Jun-yi on the Perpetual Peace: Horizons and Limits |
| Authors: | 黃冠閔
Huang,Kuan-Min |
| Contributors: | 哲學系 |
| Keywords: | 共同體;世界公民;悠久;政治;宗教;戰爭
community;cosmopolitan;perpetual;politics;religion;war |
| Date: | 2012.09 |
| Issue Date: | 2013-12-12 11:32:14 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 經過動亂的二十世紀，人類的共同生活在飽經威脅後，面臨新的挑戰並也投注新的展望。當代中國哲學持續思考此一人類續存問題，其緣由除了源自當代具體歷史經驗外，還包含著中國現代性的轉折與傳統價值調整的要求，唐君毅對永久和平的省思也提供了吾人反省的思想資源。本文從三部分來檢討唐君毅與永久和平論的關聯，第一部分簡略地陳述唐君毅有關和平的論述脈絡，整理其不同作品中的討論線索；第二部分探討唐君毅涉及康德《論永久和平》的基本思路，並以康德的論述為對照，比較兩者的異同；第三部分回到唐君毅獨特的宗教轉向，從其對西方現代性的回應與批判，以彰顯出唐君毅希望樹立文化方向的立場。透過此三部分的檢討，本文標示出唐君毅對文化差異的敏銳觀察，同時指出其和平論欠缺法權論述的開展，但仍在宗教轉向上，注意到文化的公共性；此一公共性的思考仍類似於康德。唐君毅的和平論觸及了世界公民狀態的普世性，也構成思考當代中國哲學與現代性批判的一個向度；人文世界作為公共空間或許能夠為人類共同生活的可能性提供一條思考線索。
Having passed through the tumultuous twentieth century, in which our very existence came under severe threat, mankind is still faced with a host of challenges. Numerous possibilities present themselves as well. How to address these challenges and seize these possibilities is the concern of contemporary Chinese philosophy, which has to address these issues not only because of the historical experiences of the Chinese people but also because of the need to adjust traditional values. In this respect, Tang Jun-yi (1909-1978) is representative both of Chinese philosophical contexts and of contemporary Confucian currents, for he provides profound reflections on the possibility of a perpetual peace. This paper treats Tang`s thoughts on perpetual peace in three parts. In the first part, I state briefly the context in which Tang mentions the idea of peace. The second part compares and contrasts Tang`s views on peace with those expressed in Kant`s On Perpetual Peace. In the third part, I consider how Tang`s religious viewpoint contrasts with that of Kant, and how it renders a response to and a critique of modernity in giving a cultural orientation. Through these considerations in three parts, I would like to ponder on the space left open by Tang`s acute observation of cultural difference. Although Tang, unlike Kant, underestimates the importance of rights in peace, his religious turn pays attention to the public nature of culture, and as such it is in line with Kant`s views. Tang`s theory of peace touches on cosmopolitan universality and constitutes a meaningful dimension for thinking about contemporary Chinese philosophy and the critique of modernity; Tang`s idea of the world of humanity qua public space can provide a clue to thinking about the possibility of human beings living together peacefully. |
| Relation: | 中國文哲研究集刊, 41, 79-107 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [哲學系] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 79107.pdf | | 3485Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 779 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
