English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46694666      Online Users : 681
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62497


    Title: 價值多元論與自由主義─兼論伯林的政治理論方法論
    Other Titles: Taking Berlin`s Methodology Seriously: An Interpretation of Value Pluralism and Liberalism
    Authors: 葉浩
    Yeh,Hao
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 價值多元論;自由主義;消極自由;積極自由;一元論;同情理解
    value pluralism;liberalism;negative liberty;positive liberty;monism;empathy
    Date: 2011.12
    Issue Date: 2013-12-13 17:27:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 伯林提倡價值多元論，同時宣稱支持自由主義。諸多批評者主張，價值多元論本身無法賦予特定價值優先性，所以邏輯上無法支持自由主義，抑或該主義的核心價值。另一方面，也有學者認為，伯林的價值多元論在邏輯上與主流自由主義理論相斥，甚至可以作為一種有別傳統的自由主義之理論基礎。然而，雙方皆無視於伯林的強調，價值多元論與自由主義之間並無邏輯的必然關連性。本文主張，伯林的政治思想必須依循他所倡議的方法論來理解，一方面將多元論與一元論理解為不可共量的思維模式，不僅對於何謂「價值」與「理性」的理解不同，對於人類作為道德行為者的根本看法也南轅北轍，一方面將〈兩種自由概念〉一文理解成於思想的最抽象層次上對於人類自由的捍衛，進而指出價值多元論必然否定教條式的自由主義，但卻蘊含一種「嚴以律己、寬以待人」的態度，也就是古典自由主義精神的展現。據此詮釋，伯林從事政治思想史的真正意圖，乃在於引導「刺蝟」看見多元價值之存在─他一生所呼籲的「同情理解」，也就是「狐狸」的邀請。
    Isaiah Berlin is well known to have advocated value pluralism and supported liberalism. Many critics have argued that value pluralism by logic cannot prioritize any particular value, and therefore cannot give support to liberalism. By contrast, followers of Berlin have pointed out that value pluralism logically runs against todays mainstream liberalism, but it can serve as the foundation for a new form of liberalism. Yet neither of them have taken seriously Berlins statement that the relations between value pluralism and liberalism are not logical connections.Contending that Berlins political thought can only be fully understood in light of the methodology proposed by him, this article is meant to read his writings strictly in his own terms. The result of this reading is that Berlins value pluralism and what he termed as monism are two irreconcilable visions of the world-their differences run as deep as how value and rationality may be understood, and ultimately what counts as a free moral agent. And understanding as such paves the way for us to interpret Berlins distinction between positive and negative liberty as a defence for human freedom at the most abstract level of thought, as well as a to appreciate value pluralism as a powerful argument against any form of ideology, including doctrinaire liberalism. In the end, it will be clear that value pluralism is an extrapolation of his vision of the world, which in itself is an expression of tolerant and self-critical spirit- that is, undeniably a liberal mentality. Only then could we truly understand Berlins call for empathy and his life-long engagement with writing history of ideas as a foxs strategy- to convert hedgehogs into value pluralists.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, 39,58-112
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    58112.pdf4006KbAdobe PDF21025View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback