政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/62823
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造訪人次 : 49524348      線上人數 : 709
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/62823
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62823


    題名: Antionio Cua. Conceptual Analysus of Confucian Ethics
    作者: 沈清松
    Shen, Vincent
    貢獻者: 哲學系
    日期: 2008.03
    上傳時間: 2013-12-20 17:44:33 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Antonio Cua’s work represents strongly the conceptual analysis approach to today’s study of Chinese philosophy, in particular that of Confucian ethics. In many of his publications, he has dealt with Confucian ethical key concepts, such as humanity (ren) ( ), rightness (yi) ( ), ritual or propriety (li) ( ), shame (chi) ( ), paradigmatic individual ( junzi) ( ), etc., in Confucian ethics and he always approaches them in a way to put them under philosophical explication. Cua understands “explication” as “an activity aiming at the elucidation of notions and distinctions within the context of philosophical problems.”As I see it, this philosophical method is not an isolated invention of Antonio Cua as a modern Chinese scholar. In fact, it has its historical background long before the impact of analytical philosophy in China. My reading of the history of Chinese philosophy is therefore quite different from the stereotyped presumption that China does not have an analytic tradition, or that it emphasizes intuitive thought and does not conceive philosophy as an exercise in conceptual analysis, and thereby it is different from Western philosophy, where, in Kant’s terms, philosophical knowledge is the “knowledge gained by reason from concepts,”2 or, in Deleuze and Guattari’s terms, philosophy is the `discipline that consists in creating concepts`.
    關聯: Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 35(1), 43-61
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    43-61.pdf1652KbAdobe PDF21425檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋