English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49513988      Online Users : 847
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/64022
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/64022


    Title: 橫斷面權益評價模式正確性與解釋變動能力之實證研究
    Other Titles: The Accuracy and Explainability of Cross-Sectional Equity Valuation Models
    Authors: 林江亮;郭弘卿;吳仁杰
    Lin, Chiang-Liang;Kuo, Horng-Ching;Wu, Jen-Chieh
    Contributors: 會計系
    Keywords: 一般迴歸模式;追蹤資料迴歸模式;會計基礎評價
    Panel data regression model;Cross-section model;Accounting-based valuation
    Date: 2008-11
    Issue Date: 2014-02-19 15:49:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 橫斷面(cross sectional)的評價模式中,大約可分成一般迴歸模式與追蹤
    資料(panel data)迴歸模式兩類。本研究以台灣證券交易所上市之公司為樣
    本,在價格模式下,以正確性及解釋變動能力為標準,嘗試比較一般與追蹤資
    料迴歸模式對於權益價值的解釋力及預測力。實證結果發現:不管是在正確性
    或解釋變動能力方面,追蹤資料迴歸模式均具有較佳解釋同期股價之能力;而
    在預測方面,也發現追蹤資料迴歸模式預測值之正確性及解釋變動能力均顯著
    優於一般迴歸模式。在考量不同產業與盈餘正負等因素後,所得到的結論亦相
    同。因此,在使用追蹤資料迴歸模式的情形下,不論是估計值對同時點價值的
    解釋力,或是對真實價值的預測力,皆具有較好的效果。
    Cross-sectional valuation models include general regression model and panel data
    regression model. Using a sample of listed firms in Taiwan Security Exchange, we
    compare alternative empirical estimates of intrinsic value using two criteria: accuracy
    and explainability. The study compares the reliability of value estimates from general
    regression model and panel data regression model. The empirical results show that
    the panel data regression model’s estimates are more accurate and explain more of the
    variation in security prices than the general regression models. On the other hand, the
    accuracy and explainability of panel data regression mode’s forecasts are also better
    than general regression model’s. For the sensitivity test, we consider financial industry
    and negative earnings. The sensitivity test results are similar to previous outcomes. In
    summary, we provide evidence to support that panel data regression model’s estimate
    is a better model and can raise the effectiveness of valuation model.
    Relation: 會計學報, 1(1), 83-109
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    83109.pdf1170KbAdobe PDF2849View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback