English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47961099      Online Users : 1230
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/65061
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65061


    Title: 歐式能源期貨選擇權評價: 以WTI原油為例
    Valuation of European Energy Futures Option: A Case Study of WTI Oil
    Authors: 鄧怡婷
    Deng, I Ting
    Contributors: 林士貴
    Lin, Shih Kuei
    鄧怡婷
    Deng, I Ting
    Keywords: 期貨選擇權
    均數回歸
    跳躍擴散
    季節性
    futures option
    mean reversion
    jump diffusion
    seasonality
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 11:14:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,能源商品的價格隨著國際政治情勢、國際金融環境以及景氣循環的影響產生劇烈波動,基於避險的需求,衍生性商品交易量也逐漸增加。然而,在評價能源衍生性商品的過程中,即期價格動態模型的選擇對於訂價與避險的結果有著顯著的影響,如何選擇一個適當的動態模型以評價能源商品便成為本文研究的目標。在指數與股價選擇權的評價模型中,大多以Black and Scholes (1973)提出的選擇權評價模型作為基礎,但Black-Scholes模型是否適用於評價能源市場的選擇權價格卻是有待商榷。Schwartz (1997)提出以均數回歸模型 (Mean Reversion Model)描述能源即期價格,發現比Black-Scholes模型中所假設的即期價格動態模型更能描述能源市場即期價格的波動。本研究也考慮能源市場遇到重大事件而造成即期價格產生劇烈波動的情況,因此在模型中加入跳躍項以捕捉價格跳躍的現象。另外,能源商品的需求與季節變化有高度相關性,因此本文亦考量即期價格的變動會受到季節性的變動影響,在模型中加入季節性函數,以補捉季節性的價格變化。基於前述模型考量,本研究在各種描述能源商品即期價格特性的動態模型之下,推導各個模型的期貨選擇權定價公式,進一步測試各模型在金融風暴與非金融風暴期間的訂價誤差與避險誤差,以提供投資人或避險需求者於原油期貨選擇權模型選用上之參考。
    In recent years, the price of energy commodities has fluctuated with the international political situation and the international financial environment. For the sake of hedging demands, the trading volume of derivatives has been gradually increasing. In the process of valuation of energy derivatives, choices of the spot price dynamics model have a significant impact on pricing and hedging. Therefore, how to choose an appropriate dynamic model to evaluate the energy commodities has been main purpose of this study. Two main models are tested in this paper. One is the option pricing model supposed by Black and Scholes (1973), and another is the mean reversion model supposed by Schwartz (1997). This study also considered the volatility of the spot price in the energy market in case of major events, so the researcher adds the jump to explore the mean reversion model. In addition, the demand for energy commodities is highly correlated with seasonal variations. The vibration of spot price often affected by the seasonal variations is considered in the research. Therefore, the researchers also take the seasonal function into the research to capture the seasonal price changes. Based on considerations described above, the pricing formula for each model of futures option is evaluated in the research. The researcher further tests the pricing errors and hedging errors of each model during the financial crises and non-financial crises in order to provide the investors and hedging demanders with some suggestions about selecting oil futures option models.
    Reference: Amin, K. I., Ng, V. and Pirrong, S. C. (1995), ”Valuing energy derivatives,” Risk Publications and Enron Capital & Trade Resources, 57-70.
    Bakshi, G., Cao, C. and Che, Z. (2010), “Option pricing and hedging performance under stochastic volatility and stochastic interest rates,” Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management, ch.37.
    Benth, F. E., Ekeland, L., Hauge, R. and Nielsen, B. F. (2003), “A note on arbitrage-free pricing of forward contracts in energy markets,” Applied Mathematical Finance, 10(4), 325-336.
    Bjerksund, P., and Ekern, S. (1995), “Contingent claims evaluation of mean-reverting cash flows in shipping,” in L. Trigeorgis, (Ed.), Real Options in Capital Investment: Models, Strategies, and Applications, Preager.
    Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973), “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.
    Brennan, M. J. and Schwartz, E. S. (1985), “Evaluating natural resource investments,” The Journal of Business , 58, 135-157.
    Carr, P. R, and Jarrow, R. A. (1995), “A discrete time synthesis of derivative security valuation using a term structure of futures prices,” The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Co., 225-249.
    Clewlow, L. and Strickland, C. (2000), “Energy derivatives: pricing and risk management,” Lacima Pupblications.
    Cortazar, G. and Schwartz. E. S. (1994), “The valuation of commodity-contingent claims,” Journal of Derivatives, 1, 27-39.
    Dritschel, M. and Protter, P. (1999), “Complete markets with discontinuous security price,” Finance and Stochastics, 3, 203-214.
    Hilliard, J. E., and Reis, J. A. (1999), “Jump processes in commodity futures prices and options pricing,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 273-286.
    Jensen, B., (1999), “Option pricing in the jump-diffusion model with a random jump amplitude: A complete market approach,” Working paper.
    Koekebakker, S., and G. Lien, (2004), “Volatility and price jumps in agricultural futures prices-evidence from wheat options,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 1018-1031.
    Kou, S. G. (2001), “A jump diffusion model for option pricing,” Working paper.
    Kou, S. G. (2008), “Jump-diffusion models for asset pricing in financial engineering,” Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 15, ch.2.
    Mayer, K., Schmid, T. and Weber, F. (2011), “Modeling electricity spot prices- combining mean-reversion, spikes and stochastic volatility,” Working Paper.
    Merton, R. C. (1973), “Theory of rational option pricing,” Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141-183.
    Merton, R. C. (1976), “Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 125-144.
    Pilipovic, D. (1997), “Energy risk: valuating and managing energy derivatives,” McGraw-Hill.
    Reismann, H. (1992), “Movements of the term structure of commodity futures and pricing of commodity claims,” Working Paper.
    Rubinstein, M. (1985), “Nonparametric tests of alternative option pricing models using all reported trades and quotes on the 30 most active CBOE options classes from August 23, 1976 through August 31,1978.” Journal of Finance, 40, 455-480.
    Schwartz, E. S. (1997), “The Stochastic Behaviour of Commodity Prices: Implications for Pricing and Hedging”, Journal of Finance, 52, 923 - 973.
    Weron, R. (2006), "Modeling and forecasting electricity loads and prices: a statistical approach," Wiley Finance.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融研究所
    99352023
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099352023
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    202301.pdf2647KbAdobe PDF2891View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback