政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65448
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 110944/141864 (78%)
造訪人次 : 48017221      線上人數 : 641
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/65448


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65448


    題名: 論道安從格義到尋章察句的的轉變
    其他題名: From Geyi to Xun Zhang Cha Ju: Dao-An`s Change of Method in Sutra Interpretation
    作者: 涂艷秋
    Tu, Yen-chiu
    貢獻者: 中文系
    關鍵詞: 道安;格義;尋章察句
    Dao An;geyi;xun zhang cha ju
    日期: 2010.06
    上傳時間: 2014-04-17 11:29:26 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 道安時代所謂的「格義」，本是以中國固有的思想來理解佛教名相的一種方法，道安年輕時曾一度戮力於格義的學習，後來公開反對格義，這當中變化的原因何在？當時所謂的「格義」究竟是譯經的方法，還是現解佛經的方法？ 拋開了格義之後，道安用什麼方法來理解經中大義？作者觀察現存的《人本欲生經注》後，發現道安改採「尋章察句」的方式來進行探討，然而何謂「尋章察句」？它的具體內容爲何？本文依據《人本欲生經注》做了詳細的說明。
    This study examines the Venerable Dao An`s opposition to geyi (格義). Geyi was originally a tool employed to comprehend Buddhism in terms of Chinese traditional thought. As a youth, Dao An studied geyi diligently, but later in life he rejected it openly. Why? Did Dao An see the limit of geyi and find another way to Buddhism when he decided to put it aside? Firstly, this study sets out to explore the background on which Dao An came into contact with geyi. It reveals that Dao An derived his idea of geyi from Zhu Fa-Ya. Some contemporary scholars hold that geyi brought about the conflation of Lao-Zhuang Daoism with the Pâramita Sutra. So, then what classical works did Dao An and Zhu Fa-Ya master under the influence of Fotudeng? What were the most popular works in Northern China? Was it truly the Pâramita Sutra? Did Dao An intend to solve the problems in the Pâramita Sutra when he decided to study geyi in his early days? Secondly, Was Dao An`s rejection of geyi of his own realization or was he influenced by others? What were the internal and external influences that led to this rejection? What theories influenced him sufficiently to lead him to give up the conventional approach to sutra interpretation? What was his new approach to sutra interpretation? Can we find any evidence in extant documents? These are the main concerns of this study.
    關聯: 臺大中文學報, No.32
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.2010.32.04
    DOI: 10.6281/NTUCL.2010.32.04
    顯示於類別:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    201012170011-119-165.pdf3900KbAdobe PDF2723檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋