English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46287571      Online Users : 836
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/66447


    Title: 共和主義、民族主義與憲政理論：鄂蘭與施密特的隱蔽對話
    Other Titles: Republicanism, Nationalism and Constitutional Theory: The Hidden Dialogue between Arendt and Schmitt
    Authors: 蕭高彥
    Shaw, Carl K. Y.
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 憲政主義;共和主義;民族主義;鄂蘭;卡爾•施密特
    constitutionalism;republicanism;nationalism;Hannah Arendt;Carl Schmitt
    Date: 2006-03
    Issue Date: 2014-06-04 11:27:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以西方共和主義創建理論的脈絡來比較分析卡爾‧施密特以及漢娜‧鄂蘭的憲政思想，探究兩位思想家如何基於現代民族國家以及共和主義的不同思想史資源，建構各自的憲政論述。施密特以深厚的公法學與政治思想史素養，將馬基維利以降迄於法國大革命的「超越常態之政治決斷論」為基礎，建構出一個完整的民族制憲權與同質民主的憲政理論。鄂蘭則將公民權放在古典意義的社會層次，拒斥主權原則的優先性，認為只要有人們集體地以公共自由作為行動導向，便可形成體現共同權力的政治體。本文除了探討兩者對革命制憲的不同觀點，並進一步分析，鄂蘭如何運用羅馬共和思想來批判施密特的政治神學，特別是她將「權威」與「權力」加以分離的概念架構不但是對施密特一元式權力觀念（不論是民族制憲權或主權決斷）的挑戰，更構成兩位思想家之間饒富理論意義的「隱蔽對話」。
    This paper explores the contributions of the thoughts of Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt to the issue of constitutional theory. Based on my previous research on republicanism, my argument is that Schmitt transforms the Machiavellian idea of founding into the constituent power of the nation. The identity of a state is thus located in an identification with the transcendent nation. In On Revolution, Arendt conducts a hidden dialogue with Schmitt, rejecting the idea of creating a political order via dictatorship. Relied on classical political philosophy, Arendt`s argument asserts that the "principium" (principle) exemplified in citizens` collective actions is the immanent source of political legitimacy. In this way, the locus of political identity for Arendt is societas, not nation.
    Relation: 政治科學論叢,27,113-146
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    113-146.pdf558KbAdobe PDF2453View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback