English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111283/142199 (78%)
Visitors : 48182531      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67851
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67851


    Title: 採行已發生損失模型與公允價值會計對盈餘、資本適足率與信用損失之影響
    The Impacts of Adopting Incurred Loss Model and Fair Value Accounting on Earnings, Capital and Credit Loss
    Authors: 張式傑
    Chang, Shi Jie
    Contributors: 張清福
    Chang, Ching Fu
    張式傑
    Chang, Shi Jie
    Keywords: 已發生損失模型
    公允價值會計
    壞帳費用
    盈餘波動性
    資本適足率
    信用損失
    帳款沖銷
    不良債權
    Incurred loss model
    Fair value accounting
    Loan loss provisions
    Earnings volatility
    Capital adequacy
    Credit loss
    Charge-offs
    Non-performing loans
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 16:02:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討台灣於2011年依據IAS 39進行34號公報之第三次修訂實施,採用已發生損失模型後的兩項議題:(1)放款壞帳費用之提列與盈餘波動性以及資本適足率波動性之關聯性,(2)以歷史成本評價之期末金額及以公允價值評價之期末金額,究竟何者對於未來之帳款沖銷與不良債權較具有關聯性。
    實證結果顯示,自2011年採用已發生損失模型後盈餘波動性無顯著之變化,且壞帳費用對於盈餘波動性無解釋能力;而自2011年後資本適足率波動性亦無顯著變化,但壞帳費用對於資本適足率波動性有顯著的影響,顯示銀行明顯透過壞帳費用之提列進行資本管理而非盈餘管理。在未來信用損失預測之部分,以歷史成本評價之期末放款金額對於未來之帳款沖銷及不良債權有顯著的負相關,而以公允價值評價之期末放款金額對於未來之帳款沖銷及不良債權卻無解釋能力,可能係因未來帳款沖銷與未來不良債權之發生與放款之帳齡有顯著的關聯性,而與未來可收取之現金流量無顯著之相關。
    This study aims to investigate how Incurred Loss Model affects the recognition of loan loss provisions and the valuation of loans due to the third revision of SFAS No. 34 which was revised based on IAS 39 in 2011. For the recognition of loan loss provisions, it focuses on the relationship with earnings volatilities and capital adequacy volatilities, and for the valuation of loans, it specializes on whether credit loss predicting is related to historical cost accounting or fair value accounting.
    The result shows that, since the implementation of Incurred Loss Model in 2011, both the adoption of Incurred Loss Model and the loan loss provisions have no significant impact on earnings volatilities. For capital adequacy volatilities, implementing Incurred Loss Model has no effect on capital adequacy volatilities neither. However, the loan loss provisions since 2011 significantly enhance the volatilities of capital adequacy. It reveals that banks use loan loss provisions to manage capitals instead of earnings. For credit loss predicting, loans evaluated with historical cost accounting have significant negative relations with future charge-offs and non-performing loans while loans evaluated under fair value accounting do not have any explanation power. It may suggests that future charge-offs and non-performing loans are related to the aging of loans, but not the future payoffs of loans.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    方燕玲,2005,財務會計準則公報34號實施對企業之衝擊,實用稅務,第361期(1月):77-79。
    周大慶,2010,巴賽爾協定(Basel)對金融體系之影響,台灣信用評等協會。
    財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2008,財務會計準則公報第34號「金融商品之會計處理準則」。
    財團法人會計研究發展基金會,2008,放款及應收款與其他金融商品會計處理問答集,中華民國銀行公會。
    財團法人會計研究發展基金會國際會計準則翻譯委員會專案委員會,2012,國際會計準則第39號「金融工具:認列與衡量」。
    陳育成,2002,台灣金融業的壞帳管理及相關研究,管理評論,第二十四卷第四期(十月):1-17。
    陳其昌,2012,IAS 39 – 金融工具公報開帳日轉換差異分析 – 以成本衡量金融資產為例,TEJ信用風險評估專刊(9月) 。
    郭照榮,2013,Basel III 對金融穩定及貨幣政策之影響,中央銀行金融業務檢檢查物委託研究報告。
    黃德海,2003,國內銀行放款損失會計資訊揭露之探討,中原大學會計系碩士論文。
    黃惠敏,2003,我國金融機構處理不良債權機制之研究,中原大學會計系碩士論文。
    黃金澤,2004,談34號公報下公平價值衡量與現行實務之比較,經濟日報第22版會計經緯。
    黃金澤,2004,談財會公報34號下之公平價值衡量(下),會計研究月刊,第221期(4月):78-82。

    英文文獻
    Ahmed, A. S., C. Takeda, and S. Thomas. 1999. Bank loan loss provisions: A reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signal effect. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28: 1-25.
    Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, and J. M. Wahlen. 1995. Fair value accounting: Effect on banks earnings volatility, regulatory capital, and value of contractual cash flows. Journal of Banking & Finance 19: 577-605.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2011. Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems - revised version. Basel Committee.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2013. Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools. Basel Committee.
    Beaver, W. H., C. Eger, S. Ryan, and M. Wolfson. 1989. Financial reporting, supplemental disclosures, and bank share prices. The Accounting Review 27(2): pp. 157-178
    Beaver, W. H., and E. E. Engel. 1996. Discretionary behavior with respect to allowance for loan loss and the behavior of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 177-206.
    Blankespoor, E., T. J. Linsmeier, K. R. Petroni, and C. Shakespeare. 2013. Fair value accounting for financial instruments: Does it improve the association between bank leverage and credit risk? The Accounting Review, Vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 1143-1177
    Cantrell, B. W., J. M. McInnis, and C. G. Yust. 2014. Predicting credit losses: Loan fair value versus historical costs. The Accounting Review 89: 147-176.
    Duh, R. R., A. W. H. Hsu, and P. A. Pimenta Alves. 2012. The impact of IAS 39 on the risk-relevance of earnings volatility: Evidence from foreign banks cross-listed in the USA. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 8: 23–38.
    Eccher, E. A., K. Ramesh, and S. R. Thiagarajan. 1996. Fair value disclosures by bank holding companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1-3): 79-117.
    Elliott, J. A., J. D. Hanna, and W. H. Shaw. 1991. The evaluation by the financial markets of changes in bank loan loss reserve levels. The Accounting Review 66(4): 847-861.
    Evans, M. E., L. D. Hodder, and P. E. Hopkins. 2014. The predictive ability of fair values for future financial performance of commercial banks and the relation of predictive ability to bank’s share prices. Contemporary Accounting Research : 31(1): 13-44.
    Fiechter, P. 2011. The effects of the fair value option under IAS 39 on the volatility of bank earnings. Journal of International Accounting Research 10(1): 85–108.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board of the Financial Accounting Foundation. 2007. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
    Gebhardt, G., and Z. Novotny-Farkas. 2011. Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European banks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 38(3-4): 289–333.
    Greenawalt, M. B. and J. F. Sinkey, Jr. 1988. Bank loan loss provisions and the income-smoothing hypothesis: An empirical analysis 1976-1984. Journal of Financial Service Research (1): 301-318.
    Hodder, L. D., P. E. Hopkins, and J. M. Wahlen. 2006. Risk-relevance of fair-value income measures for commercial banks. The Accounting Review 81(2): 337-375.
    International Financial Reporting Standards. 2013. Financial instruments: Expected credit losses Exposure Draft. IFRS Foundation.
    Liu, C. C. and S. Ryan. 1995. The effect of bank loan portfolio composition on the market reaction to and anticipation of loan loss provisions. Journal of Accounting Research 33(1): 77-94.
    Liu, C. C., S. G. Ryan, and J. M. Wahlen. 1997. Differential valuation implications of loan loss provisions across banks and financial quarters. The Accounting Review 72(1): 133-146.
    Liu, C. C. and S. G. Ryan, 2006, Income smoothing over business cycle: Changes in banks’ coordinated management of provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs from the pre-1990 bust to the 1990s boom. The Accounting Review Vol.81 No.2, pp. 421-441
    Nelson, K. K. 1996. Fair value accounting for commercial banks: An empirical analysis of SFAS No 107. The Accounting Review 71(2): 161-182.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    101353024
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101353024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    302401.pdf1065KbAdobe PDF2792View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback