English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 95906/126496 (76%)
Visitors : 31660337      Online Users : 445
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67997


    Title: 鄰避性環境衝突管理的制度與策略─以理性選擇與交易成本理論分析六輕建廠及拜耳投資案
    Other Titles: Institutions and Strategies for Managing NIMBY Environmental Disputes: The Cases of Sixth Naphtha Cracker Plant and Bayer Project
    Authors: 湯京平
    Tang, Ching-Ping
    Contributors: 政治系
    Date: 1999.06
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 18:08:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 民主化以來,我國因環境意識提高,公權力強力介入環境糾紛的可行性大幅降低,導致鄰避性(NIMBY, Not In My Back Yard)環境衝突案件層出不窮。本文首先介紹鄰避性環境衝突的一些特質,並以交易成本的理論,分析制度在此間可扮演的角色,同時檢視國外在處理類似情境時所做的制度化之努力。為深入解釋台灣民主化進程所產生的特殊問題,本文針對分析台塑於利澤與麥寮之六輕設廠及拜耳於台中港地區的投資案中所面臨的鄰避衝突,作情境與策略之分析,以印證「適度以制度與策略地提昇政治參與及對話,始能成功地控制環境議題的『泛政治』化趨勢」之命題,並做成政策上的建議。
    Taiwan’s economic development has been plagued by the NIMBY (Not In MY Back Yard) protests. Under democratization, the government can no longer rely purely on its authority to preclude grass-roots protests against the preemption of locally unwanted land uses. Neither has the government built up systematical channels for sufficient public discourses on siting decisions, as a democratic system normally allows, nor has it created credible mechanisms to solve disputes. Mainly through rational choice and transaction cost theory, this paper examines the institutional deficits of Taiwan in dealing with NIMY environmental conflicts. It analyzes the situational and strategic factors that had interacted with existing institutions in three cases–the Sixth Naphtha Cracker Plants in Li-che (I-lan) and Mai-liao (Yun-lin) respectively, and Bayer in Tai-chung Harbor area. It argues that promoting political discourses in earlier stage of citing decisions is just the way to control undue politicizing activities by local elite soliciting private selective interests. This paper concludes by discussing some policy implications of important findings.
    Relation: 政治科學論叢, 10, 355-384
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    355384.pdf150KbAdobe PDF778View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback