政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68315
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 111300/142216 (78%)
造访人次 : 48318219      在线人数 : 612
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68315


    题名: 旅遊目的地意象、口碑與滿意度之關係研究－以宜蘭旅遊為例
    Relationship among Destination Image, Word of Mouth, and Satisfaction － A Case Study of Yilan
    作者: 吳凱霆
    NG HOI TING
    贡献者: 吳靜吉
    Wu, Jing Jyi
    吳凱霆
    NG HOI TING
    关键词: 旅遊目的地意象
    口碑
    旅遊滿意度
    Destination Image
    Word-of-Mouth
    Satisfaction
    日期: 2013
    上传时间: 2014-08-06 11:57:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要探討「旅遊目的地意象」、「口碑」與「滿意度」之關係。

    「旅遊目的地意象」主要分為3種狀況：期待之旅遊目的地意象（體驗前之旅遊目的地意象）、實際體驗後之旅遊目的地意象，以及旅遊目的地意象之落差。

    本研究也探討旅客對旅遊目的地之資訊收集方式及其可靠度，與體驗前之旅遊目的地意象、旅遊目的地意象之落差，和旅遊滿度的相關性。旅客資訊收集的方式，共分為：（1）傳統口碑傳播、（2）傳統媒體傳播、（3）電子口碑傳播、（4）電子媒體傳播四種。

    旅遊目的地意象量表的內容由兩大部份組成，第一部份借用Florida(2012) 所提出的創意城市4T條件，發展出創意城市量表，本研究不在討論創意城市，而是借用4T的條件來衡量旅客對目的地的意象。第二部份則根據Pine II & Gilmore(1998) 體驗經濟的4大領域，作為另一個測量旅客對旅遊目的地意象的體驗知覺量表。分別跑出創意城市意象和體驗知覺意象兩個因素，前者的Cronbach’ s α值為.658，後者的Cronbach’ s α值為.881。

    旅遊滿意度量表，包括整體滿意度、重遊意願、推薦意願和移居意願的內容，共7個題目，得出一個因素，Cronbach’ s α值為.790。
    所有量表評分之方式皆採用 Likert 5點量表，從「非常不同意」、「不同意」「普通」、「同意」到「非常同意」，分別給予1至5分。

    本研究的對象為宜蘭的旅客，於2013年6月2日，及6月9日，下午5時至晚上11時，在宜蘭縣羅東鎮之火車站及客運站發放問卷。總共收集208個有效樣本，25歲以下占74%；學生占73.6%；台北人占55%、宜蘭人占11％、台北及宜蘭以外地區占34%。

    在旅客旅遊現況方面：
    旅遊資訊收集方式之採用狀況（複選題），「電子媒體傳播」（96.2%）為最多，「傳統口碑傳播」（90.4%）第2多， 「傳統媒體傳播」（88.5%）為第三， 「電子口碑傳播」（81.7%）人數最少。採用百分比均超過81.7％，表示大部份旅客會同時採用多種旅遊資訊收集方式。

    旅遊資訊收集方式之可靠程度，由高至低之排序為「傳統口碑傳播」（4.02）、 「電子口碑傳播」（3.35）「電子媒體傳播」（3.41）、「傳統媒體傳播」（3.18）。

    實際體驗前，旅客期待之旅遊目的地意象，創意城市意象為3.426，旅客體驗意象為3.7139。
    實際體驗後之旅遊目的地意象，創意城市整體印象為3.4875，旅客整體體驗為3.90064。
    旅遊目的地意象之落差雖然很小（旅遊目的地意象之落差 = 體驗後之旅遊目的地意象－期待之旅遊目的地意象），但各項數值基本都有所提升，創意城市整體印象之落差為0.0615，旅客整體體驗之落差為0.1867，可見旅客實際體驗後之旅遊目的地意象皆比期待稍為好。

    旅遊滿意度由7個題目構成整個量表，分數為3.8482，接近同意。細部分為三個構面來看，平衡分數依序為：(1)包括重遊意願的整體滿意度(4.1995)，(2)推薦意願(平均分為3.881)，(3)移居意願(3.0144)。從各構面的狀況，可見旅客對宜蘭的整體滿意度及重遊意願很高，也願意透過各種資料收集方式推薦宜蘭，但是移居宜蘭的意願只有普通。

    在假設驗證方面：
    1. 旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度與期待之旅遊目的地意象具有顯著的正相關，大部份假設成立。
    2. 旅客期待之旅遊目的地意象與實際體驗後之旅遊目的地意象具有顯著的正相關，假設皆成立。
    3. 旅客實際體驗後之旅遊目的地意象與旅遊滿意度具有顯著正相關，假設皆成立。
    4. 旅客期待之旅遊目的地意象與旅遊滿意度具有顯著的正相關，假設皆成立。
    5. 旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度與目的地意象之落差具有顯著的負相關，只有旅客對以電子媒體傳播方式收集之旅遊資訊信任度與目的地意象之落差(以旅客體驗角度) 具有顯著的負相關，假設成立。
    6. 目的地意象之落差與旅遊滿意度具有顯著的相關，假設皆不成立。
    7. 旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度與旅遊滿意度具有顯著的正相關，結果大部份假設成立。
    The major purpose of this research was to explore the relationship among Destination Image, Word-of-Mouth, and Satisfaction.

    Destination Image includes 3 situations: Expected Destination Image (期待之旅遊目的地意象), Destination Image After Visiting (實際之旅遊目的地意象), and Gap between Expected and Actual Destination Image (旅遊目的地意象之落差).

    This research also explored how travelers collect tourist information, including: (1) traditional word-of-mouth dissemination (傳統口碑傳播), (2) traditional advertising dissemination (傳統媒體傳播), (3) electronic word-of-mouth dissemination (電子口碑傳播), and (4) electronic advertising dissemination (電子媒體傳播).

    The Destination Image Scale is composed of two parts, which include the Traveler Experience Scale from Pine II & Gilmore (1998), and the concepts of Creative City Scale from Florida (2012). The reliability of the scales are .658 and .881.

    The Satisfaction Scale includes three parts: Total Satisfaction (including willingness to revisit) (整體滿意度和重遊意願), Willingness to Recommend (推薦意願) and Willingness to Migrate (移居意願). The reliability of the scales is .790.

    All measurement used a 5-point Likert-scale, from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree).
    The subjects of this research were travelers to Yilan on June 2 and June 9, 2013, from 5pm to 11pm. 208 questionnaires were collected at bus stations and the train station in Luodong Township of Yilan County. 74% of respondents were under 25 years old; 73.6% were students; 55% were from Taipei, 11% from Yilan, and 34% from other cities.

    The current traveler information gathering situation:
    Regarding travelers collecting tourist information, most travelers use electronic advertising dissemination (96.2%), followed by traditional word-of-mouth dissemination (90.4%), traditional advertising dissemination, and finally electronic word-of-mouth dissemination (81.7%). With all four information collection rates above 80%, it is clear that travelers use more than one way to the gather tourist information.

    The degree of dependence for the methods of collecting information (旅遊資訊收集方式之可靠程度) from high to low is traditional word-of-mouth dissemination, (4.02), electronic word-of-mouth dissemination (3.35), electronic advertising dissemination (3.41), and finally traditional advertising dissemination (3.18).

    Before visiting the destination (Expected Destination Image) the overall image of a creative city (創意城市整體印象) was 3.426, and overall traveler experience (旅客整體體驗) was 3.7139.

    Regarding Destination Image After Visiting, the overall creative city image was 3.4875, and overall traveler experience was 3.90064. The Gap between Expected and Actual Destination Image (旅遊目的地意象之落差) was very low, but all evaluations showed an increase from pre- to post-visit. The same method of comparison showed that the gap between the overall image of creative city was 0.0615, and the gap between overall traveler experience is 0.1867. From this, we can see that for the se travelers, the reality was better than the expectation.

    The Satisfaction Scale included 3 items, from high to low, and Total Satisfaction included willingness to revisit (4.1995), willingness to recommend (3.881), and willingness to migrate (3.0144).

    Hypothesis testing:
    1. Most correlations between the trustworthiness of collected information (旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度) and Expected Destination Image (期待之旅遊目的地意象) were significant and positive.

    2. All correlations between Expected Destination Image (期待之旅遊目的地意象) and Destination Image After Visiting (實際之旅遊目的地意象) were significant and positive.

    3. All correlations between Destination Image After Visiting (實際之旅遊目的地意象) and Satisfaction (旅遊滿意度) were significant and positive.

    4. All correlations between Expected Destination Image (期待之旅遊目的地意象) and Satisfaction (旅遊滿意度) were significant and positive.

    5. Only one hypothesis had a significant negative correlation between the trustworthiness of collected information (旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度) and Gap between Expected and Actual Destination Image (旅遊目的地意象之落差).

    6. There was no significant correlation between Gap between Expected and Actual Destination Image (旅遊目的地意象之落差) and Satisfaction (旅遊滿意度).

    7. Most correlations between the trustworthiness of collected information (旅客對各類已收集之旅遊資訊的信任度) and Satisfaction (旅遊滿意度) were significant and positive.
    參考文獻: 英文文獻
    Arndt, J. (1967) “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,” Journal of Marketing Research pp. 291-295.

    Baloglu, S. & McCleary, K.W. (1999) A model of destination image formation, Annals of Tourism Research, 35 (4), 11-15.

    Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W. & Engle, J. F. (2006). Consumer Behavior, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publisher.

    Bone, P. F. “Determinants of Word-of-Mouth Communications during Product Consumption,” Advances in Consumer Research (19:1), 1992, pp. 579-583.

    Cardozo, R.N. (1965), An experimental study of consumer effort, expectations and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, 244-249.

    Charles Landary (2012) Talented Taipei & The Creative Imperative

    Clawson, M. & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of outdoor recreation, (pp.33-36). Resources for the Future, Inc

    Crompton, J. L. (1979). An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon that image. Journal of Travel Research, 18–23.

    Chen, C.F & Tsai, D.G. (2007) How destination image and evaluative factors affect behavioral intentions? Tourism Management, 28 (4), 1115-1122.
     
    Driscoll, A., & Lawson, R. (1990). New Zealand’s position as a destination for New Zealanders: Amulti dimensional scaling approach. New Zealand Journal of Business, 12, 105–118.

    Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2), 2–12.

    Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. & Miniard, P. W. (1986). Consumer behavior, 5th ed. Hins-dale, IL: Dryden.

    Fakeye, P. C., & Crompton, J. L. (1991). Image differences between prospective, first time, and repeat visitors to the Lower Rio Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, 30, 10–16.

    Gartner, W. C., and J. D. Hunt (1987). “An Analysis of State Image Change over a Twelve-Year Period (1971–1983).” Journal of Travel Research, 25 (2): 15–19.

    Gallarza, M., Gil, I. & Calderon, H.(2002) Destination image. Towards a conceptual framework, Annals of Tourism Research, 29 (1), 56-78.

    Gallarza, M.G., Saura, I. G. & Garcia, H. C.(2002) Destination image: towards a conceptual framework, Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 56-78.

    Goodrich, J. N. (1978). The relationship between preferences for and perceptions of vacation destinations: Application of a choice model. Journal of Travel Research, 17, 8–13.

    Goodrich, J.N.(1978).A new approach to image analysis through multidimensional scaling. Journal of Travel Research, 16(3), 3–7.

    Goodrich, J. N. (1979). Benefit bundle analysis: an empirical study of international travellers. Journal of Travel Research, 16, 6–9.

    Govers, R., Go, F.M. & Kumar, K., (2007) Promoting Tourism Destination Image, Journal of Travel Research, 46 (1), 15-23.

    Gunn, C.A. 1972 Vacationscape: Designing Tourist Regions, Taylor & Francis, Washington.

    Hempel, D.J Consumer satisfaction with the home buying process: Conceptualization and measurement. In H. Keith Hunt, The conceptualization of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction (pp. 279- 299), 1977, MA: Marketing Science Institute

    Hunt, J. D. (1975). Image as a factor in tourism development. Journal
    of Travel Research, 13, 1–7.

    Katz, E., and P. F. Lazarsfeld. (1955) Personal Influence

    Koji Ishida (2011) The Effects of Traditional and Electronic Word-of-mouth on Destination Image of Vacation Tourists: A case of Branson, Missouri, Kanazawa Institute of Technology Nonoich, Ishikawa prefecture, Japan

    Manning, R. E. 1986. Studies in outdoor recreation: A review and synthesis of social science literature in outdoor recreation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University

    Oliver, R. L. 1980. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of
    Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(Nov): 460-469.

    Pearce, P. L. (1977). Mental souvenirs: a study of tourists and their city maps. Australian Journal of Psychology, 29(3), 203–210.

    Pearce, P. L. (1982). Perceived changes in holiday destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 9, 145–164. 
    Phelps, A. (1986). Holiday destination image—the problem of assessment. Tourism Management, 168–180.

    Pike, S. (2002). “Destination Image Analysis—A Review of 142 Papers from 1973 to 2000.” Tourism Management, 23 (5): 541–549.

    Tapachai, N., and R. Waryszak (2000). “An Examination of the Role of Beneficial Image in Tourist Destination Selection.” Journal of Travel Research, 39 (1): 37–44.

    Reynolds, T.J. & Guttman, J. (1984) Advertising is image management, Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 27-37.

    Singh, J., and S. Pandya. “Exploring the Effects of Consumers` Dissatisfaction Level on Complaint Behaviors,” European Journal of Marketing (25:9), 1991, pp. 7-21.

    Woodside, A. G., & Lysonski, S. (1989). A general model of traveller destination choice. Journal of Travel Research, 8–14.

    中文文獻
    林欣玫(2004)，遊憩產業遊客之體驗與滿意度之關聯性研究，朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。

    林佩璇(2011)，銘傳大學，觀光客旅遊目的地意象與電子口碑對旅遊意願影響之研究 -以馬祖旅遊為例

    宜蘭觀光工廠協會網站，http://www.diy.org.tw/

    吳昱鋒(2013)，國立政治大學，遊客體驗與價值感受關係之研究—以宜蘭綠色博覽會為例

    吳紹安(2013)，國立政治大學，發展電影創意城鄉的衡量工具─以宜蘭為試探對象

    吳靜吉(2005)，四T九A酷小鎮。

    吳靜吉(2009)，創意城市勢在必行，今周刊 675 期。

    吳靜吉(2010)，創意城市正夯，今周刊 696 期。

    吳靜吉，于國華(民2012)，創意城鄉，幸福宜蘭。
    陳弘尉(2006)，南台科技大學，旅遊意象對滿意度與重遊意願之影響研究-以2006台灣燈會為例。

    蔡精育(2008)，中央大學，網路論壇口碑之研究

    游淑娟(2006)，朝陽科技大學企業管理系，顧客間互動、體驗模組與顧客價值之關聯性研究 —休閒產業之驗證

    夏業良，魯煒，江麗美(譯)(2013)，體驗經濟時代(十週年修訂版)，台北市:城邦。(原作者:B. Joseph Pine II & James H.Gilmore) (原著出版年:2012)

    韋文豐(2013)，國立政治大學，建構美食的創意城鄉驗之探討-以宜蘭為例

    傅振焜(譯)(2010)，創意新貴2─經濟成長的三T模式，寶鼎出版。(原作者: Richard Florida) (原著出版年:2005)

    謝松齡（民97），國立政治大學，網路商店進行網路口碑管理之研究 -以網路化妝品商店為例
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    100359037
    102
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359037
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    903701.pdf7317KbAdobe PDF2175检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈