English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 107400/138517 (78%)
Visitors : 41265439      Online Users : 1016
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68623

    Title: 臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究
    Other Titles: Citation Type Analysis on Humanity Literature of Taiwan
    Authors: 蔡明月;邱琦茹
    Tsay, Ming-Yueh;Chiu, Chi-Ju
    Contributors: 圖檔所
    Keywords: 人文學;引用類型;期刊論文結構;引用位置;引用文獻分析
    Humanity;Citation type;Classification of citation;Citation analysis
    Date: 2014.04
    Issue Date: 2014-08-12 15:46:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究利用引用文獻分析法,針對國內人文學各學科頂尖期刊,其2011年所出版的研究性文章為樣本,探討其論文結構與引用文獻出現在文章中的位置。再者,進一步採用Frost模式,分析各學科引用類型以及國內外引用類型的異同。本研究結果發現國內文史哲藝術四門人文學科以論述型文獻為主,語言學以結構型文獻為主。論述型文章的引用文獻以本文部分最多,結論最少;結構型文章之引用文獻則是緒論部分最多,研究方法次之。人文學大多引用作品原著的首次作品,引用類型以支持作者意見或事實描述為主。整體而言國內外引用類型分布大致相似,不同之處各學科略有差異。本研究結果可以了解人文學學者的引用特性與資訊需求,進而提升圖書館相關服務。再者,亦可增進人文學者對引用文獻本質的認識,並期望為未來相關實證研究提供參考。
    Using informetrics and citation analysis, the present study explores and compares characteristics and types of citations in the humanity journal articles that published in Taiwan. Research articles published in 2011, from top humanity journals, assessed by the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science Council in Taiwan, were collected and analyzed. The analysis was done by structure of journal article and location of citations. In addition to citations appearing in the text, the phenomena of citation type will be compared and discussed in the latter part. The results of this study revealed articles of literature, history, philosophy and arts were mostly argumentative, while linguistic articles tended to comply with IMRAD (Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, And Discussion) formats. Introducing primary materials from original works, humanity scholars tended to cite for factual descriptions or to support authors` perspectives. Secondary materials, such as later studies on the original works by other scholars, were seen the most in the disciplines of linguistics while the least in that of history. In general, the distribution of citation types is similar between articles in domestic and foreign journals; merely minor differences occurred among disciplines. While citing characteristics and information needs of humanities scholars revealed in this study may contribute to collection development of libraries or refinement of information services to researchers, suggestions based on analysis of research results may also serve as reference for standardization of writing and publication of journal articles in Taiwan. Aiming at further exploration of citations, this study is expected to provide a better understanding of the nature of citations and to serve as a foundation for future empirical studies.
    Relation: 教育資料與圖書館學, 51(3), 1-37
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM
    DOI: 10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    337-364.pdf1311KbAdobe PDF2963View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback