English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46424141      Online Users : 641
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69056


    Title: 行政命令受行政爭訟審查之研究---以2000年7月1日後之訴願決定與行政法院判決為中心
    Other Titles: The Research of the Administrative Judicial Remedies in Reviewing Administrative Rules--- with an Overview of Administrative Court and the Administrative Appeals Commissions Cases after 1 July 2000
    Authors: 吳秦雯
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 行政命令;行政法院;訴願;行政監督
    Administrative rules;Administrative Judicial Remedies;Administrative court;Administrative control
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2014-08-21 09:08:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 由行政機關依據職權或受立法者授權所訂定之行政命令，不論其於實務中使用 何種名稱，對於整體社會都產生相當大的拘束力。依據我國憲法明文，命令不得抵 觸法律與憲法，對於違法命令行使有效的審查權，不論對於人民權利保護與依法行 政之遵守，都相當重要。我國訴願法與行政訴訟法於2000 年大幅修正實施後，整體 行政爭訟程序中，對於行政命令受到如何的監督密度與方式，本計畫預計從事較為 整體、全面的量化研究。適圖釐清：我國現行訴願制度運作狀況，是否與行政法院 進行良好的分工、發揮適如其分的行政監督功能；行政法院對於行政命令之監督方 式，是否不區分其正當性基礎來源之差異，進行偏向於形式與程序的監督，但針對 案件涉及之子領域不同，有著不同的審查密度；大法官目前高度介入行政命令之審 查，是否因為行政法院之審查密度不足、審查方式流於形式化，且最高行政法院未 形成對於行政命令效力存續與否之權威性。並以此為基礎，提出我國行政爭訟程序 必要可能的改革建議。
    The Administrative Court and all the administrative appeals commissions were reorganized in 1999, since the Administrative Litigation Act and the administrative appeal Act were revised substantially. The new system was launched in 2000; thus, this research will discuss the Administrative Judicial Remedies in reviewing Administrative rules after 2000, as it concerns with constitutional principles of the rule of law and checks and balances of governmental branches. Using data from the electronic databases created by the Judicial Yuan and most of the administrative appeals commissions, this research will employ an empirical method, rather than the traditional leading case approach, to understand and analyze the real situation of court’s and commissions’ decisions. The aim of this research is to examine the relationship between the attitude of control of the Grand Justice, and the way of formal judicial review of the Administrative Judicial Remedies. Based on the findings, this research will provide some suggestions in ways of the protection of human right and the supervision of administration.
    Relation: 行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC100-2410-H128-007
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100-2410-H128-007.pdf471KbAdobe PDF2719View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback