English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 95906/126496 (76%)
Visitors : 31727731      Online Users : 488
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69713


    Title: 合作義務之實踐-工程契約定作人用地提供行為之探討
    Other Titles: The Duty to Co-operate: A Study of Employers’ Obligation of Site Providing in Construction Contracts
    Authors: 顏玉明
    Contributors: 法科所
    Keywords: 合作義務;誠信與公平交易原則;合理期待;工程契約;工程用地
    Duty to Co-operate;Principles of Good Faith and Fair Dealing;Reasonable Expectation;Construction Contract
    Date: 2012.06
    Issue Date: 2014-09-10 15:36:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 工程契約因其規範之專業龐雜,往往須定作人之協力,如由定作人提供工程用地、供給材料,或由定作人指示,或須定作人到場,始得完成者,定作人不為其行為,即無由完成工作。近來於國際間漸有以誠信與公平交易原則為核心,產生「合作義務」(duty to co-operate)之概念,取代協力究為真正義務或不真正義務之爭鳴。本文即以工程契約定作人用地提供行為為中心,探討邇近國際間「合作義務」之根源、理論與其實踐,包括於國際間契約法原則與國際工程契約範本之展現,及德、英、美、日等地區之發展現狀,期能藉由比較法之觀察提供借鏡,探求在我國現行法規範及工程契約範本未見完備之現況下,可能尋求之解決方案。
    Construction contract is famous for its complicated and specialized character. It requires co-operation from the employer for providing site and materials, either a set of instructions or physical presence to enable the performance of contracts; otherwise, there is no basis for fulfilling their requirements. Recently a call of ‘duty to co-operate’ has come into being under the umbrella of the principles of good faith and fair dealing to mitigate the debate on the nature of employers’ obligations. This paper therefore focuses on the study of site-providing by employers in construction contracts in order to explore the foundation, doctrine and practices of the principle of the duty to co-operate within the principles of international contract laws and global construction contracts, as well as the legislation in the countries of England, the United States, Germany and Japan. The comparative nature of this study, it is hoped, should inspire the development of construction contract legislation in Taiwan.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, No.127, pp.53-115
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    53115.pdf1017KbAdobe PDF1457View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback