English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25724339      Online Users : 270
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/70233
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70233


    Title: 論經驗法則
    Other Titles: Erfahrungssätze
    Authors: 姜世明
    Chiang, Shyf-Ming
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 蓋然性;經驗法則;經驗原則;證據評價;自由心證
    Free assessment;Experience;Probabilistic;Burden of proof;Evaluation of evidence
    Date: 2009.02
    Issue Date: 2014-09-30 17:48:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 經驗法則係證據法上之核心議題,有關自由心證、間接證明及表見證明等制度均有賴經驗法則之確立乃得被適切地運用。若未能對於經驗法則概念為適當地釐清,即甚易造成各法官因對於經驗法則之評價不同,而造成類似案情,卻有不同判決結論之情形。而此一情形,適即為自由心證被詬病之重要理由之一。在我國,雖對於經驗法則之研究,已有學者提出重要之見解。實務上亦經常以之作為認定事實之推理基礎。但對於經驗法則是否存在不同類型態樣,亦即可否依據蓋然性高低而對其進行有意義之分類,並進而使其可在認定事實中具有不同功能,卻仍屬我國法上可進一步發展之領域。本文擬藉助德國文獻,並參考國內學者見解及實務判決,歸納、演繹與分析,期對於經驗法則層次化及其運用合理化之可能性進行較完整之評估。尤其本文將對於實務上對於通姦案型之事實認定,進行分析,期對於此一經常受到質疑之判決認事程序類型,提出解決之道。末並將提出對於判決論理結構之建議,盼能有助於加強實務判決認事程序之透明性及可檢驗性。
    In Taiwan, historical studies on the rule of experience (Emperical Rule, Erfahrungssätze) have enabled some scholars to propose important insights in perspective, and the rule is also frequently embedded in the fundamental reasoning of the fact-finding process in trial practice. Nevertheless, in terms of Taiwan’s legal regime, further developments are desired and awaited as to whether and how the rule of experience can be divided into different classifications and patterns, i.e., whether meaningful classifications can be performed based on the probabilities spectrum, with each classification exerting different functionalities in the fact-finding process.This thesis deals with these issues by methodologies of induction, deduction and critical analysis, with reference being made to the German legal literature as well as perspectives from Taiwan’s scholarly writings and jurisprudence. It aims to drill down a comprehensive review over the hierarchy and possibilities of rational application of the rule of experience. In particular, by way of analyzing the judicial practice in adultery cases, this thesis endeavors to offer solutions to the oft-cited challenges posed to the fact-finding process in such case patterns. Lastly, this thesis provides recommendations to formulate a logical framework to be employed in judicial decisions, in the hope of strengthening the transparency and verifiability of the fact-finding process in the judicial practice.
    Relation: 法學評論, 107 , 1- 81
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文
    [法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-81.pdf977KbAdobe PDF8266View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback