政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70327

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70327

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 110175/141113 (78%)
造访人次 : 46558105 在线人数 : 1022

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS) > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/70327

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70327

题名:	新瓶舊酒：中國文化與中共政權正當性之研究 Old Wine in a New Bottle? The Role of Confucianism in the Legitimacy Strategy of the Chinese Communist Party
作者:	范德銘 Alexander van der Meer
贡献者:	趙建民 Chao, Chien Min 范德銘 Alexander van der Meer
关键词:	儒家中國共產黨正當性中國文化 Confucianism Chinese Communist Party Political Legitimacy Chinese Culture
日期:	2013
上传时间:	2014-10-01 13:43:19 (UTC+8)
摘要:	數十年來，中國共產黨對於儒家主義的文化價值產生巨變。不似四十年前的革命，當時共產黨欲拔除儒道深植的價值，孔夫子成為國家反革命的代表形象。相反的，近年來黨內開始重塑孔夫子的地位，藉由每年慶祝孔子誕辰，立孔子像以彰顯他的貢獻，塑造成中國偉大的聖人。這大膽假設過去以馬克思主義的基本意識形態可能在改變，產生共鳴的對象從馬克思主義蛻變成儒家主義。另外一說：中國共產黨意圖採用普世的儒家價值來合理化其作為。因此我們應如何看待這個黨與過去其眼中的「魔」共舞？黨對於儒家主義的真正意圖為合？本文研究重點將解釋以上問題。首先，本文將透過理論去探討儒家主義如何合理化政治行為。接著將透過重要的歷史背景因素證明一開始的中國共產黨對儒家主義的深惡痛絕。其後將透過第一手的文件和歷史文獻佐證在1980年代儒家主義復甦以後，黨轉變為尋找與大眾價值的共識──與儒家主義共存的立場。儒家主義的再次興起帶來了民族尊嚴，進而使黨更容易透過國家主義統一整個國家。另一方面，中國共產黨也試著傳播精心塑造的儒家主義，去蕪存菁的挑選出最利於黨的儒家元素架構。後段將提到中國共產黨如何選擇性的篩選儒家主義元素來支持獨裁統治，向國際營造中國穩定社會的形象；而非摒棄過去基本意識形態──馬克思主義卻選擇西化。最後駁斥某些立場：如中國共產黨正準備脫離現下的基本意識進而靠攏儒家主義。因此，儘管過去中國共產黨批評儒家主義是製造階級化的淵藪，但現在卻一步步採用同樣思想，合理化獨裁統治。這種五十步笑百步的行為，挑選了利於黨的儒家元素，將存在中國兩千年的儒家主義的這甕舊酒，裝到中國共產黨統治下的這個新瓶裡。 Over the last few decades, the Chinese Communist Party’s attitude towards the most profound determinant of the traditional Chinese culture – Confucianism – changed significantly. Not even 40 years ago, Confucius was represented as an anti-revolutionary enemy of the state, while the party tried to root out every sprout of Confucianism amongst the population. Contrarily, nowadays, the party seems to have re-instated Confucius to the position of ‘great Chinese sage’, for which it organizes his annual birthday parties, raises statues for him and praises his contributions to humanity. This leads some observers to the bold conclusion that the party might even be prepared to change its ideological basis from Marxism – which lost its resonance amongst the population anyways – to Confucianism. Others disagree, and argue that the party is just widening its legitimacy basis in a populist way by using all kinds of means, amongst which Confucianism. Thus, how should we assess the party’s dance with the former devil? What is actually the party’s plan with Confucianism? Giving an answer to the latter question is the main purpose of this research. First of all, as most authors relate this phenomenon to the party’s quest for political legitimacy, a basic theoretical overview will be given, showing possible causality between Confucianism and political legitimacy. Secondly, the most essential historical background will be provided in order to explain why the party was initially so malicious towards Confucianism. Subsequently, based on literature, and based on an analysis of primary sources, it will be argued that the party, after witnessing a popular revival of Confucianism in the 1980s, on the one hand sought consensus with the population by co-opting this revival – a revival which led to national pride, enabling the party to capitalize on its nationalist legacy as unifier of the country – while it on the other hand tried to channel this development into a meticulously constructed form of Confucianism – by selecting some elements and discarding others – that would benefit the party. The latter refers to a fragmented version of Confucianism which supports authoritarian rule, enhances social stability, shows a gentler face of China to the outside world, presents an attractive cultural alternative to Westernization, but - most importantly - doesn’t present an ideological alternative to Marxism. The latter refutes the claim that the CCP is preparing to depart from its current ideological base towards Confucianism. Concluding, despite the fact that the party previously vigorously blamed Confucianism for having facilitated the subjugation of the population, it now more or less uses Confucianism in a similar manner. The pot seems to have called the kettle black. Therefore, the role of Confucianism in the CCP’s legitimacy strategy is old wine – symbolizing the way in which dynastical China has used a selection of Confucian teachings to enhance its authoritarian rule for two millennia – in a new socialist bottle.
參考文獻:	Ai, Jiawen. “The Refunctioning of Confucianism: The Mainland Chinese Intellectual Response to Confucianism since the 1980s.” Issues & Studies 44, no. 2(2008): 29-78. Ai, Jiawen. “Two Sides of one Coin: The Party’s Attitude towards Confucianism in Contemporary China.” Journal of Contemporary China 18, no. 61 (2009): 689-701. Ashiwa, Yoshiko and David L. Wank. Making Religion , Making the State, the Politics of Religion in Modern China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009. Bell, Daniel A. China’s new Confucianism, Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Buchanan, Allen. “Political Legitimacy and Democracy.” Ethics 112, no.4 (2002): 689-719. Burton, Charles. Political and Social Change in China since 1978. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990. Chang, Jung and Jon Halliday. Mao: The Unknown Story. London: Random House, 2005. Covell, Ralph R. “Christianity and China’s Minority Nationalities, Faith and Unbelief.” In China and Christianity, Burdened Past, Hopeful Future, edited by Stephen Uhalley and Xiaoxin Wu, 271-282. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2001. Clifford Geertz. The Interpretation of Cultures, Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books, 1993. Dotson, John. “The Confucian Revival in the Propaganda Narratives of the Chinese Government.” The United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, U.S. Congress, July 20, 2011. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Fan, R., ed. The Renaissance of Confucianism in Contemporary China. New York: Springer, 2011. Fan, Ying. “A Classification of Chinese Culture.” Cross Cultural Management 7, no. 2 (2000): 3-10. Fan, Ying. “Confucius meets Mao, the Changing Chinese National Identity and its Implications for Branding.” In Contemporary Perspectives on Corporate Marketing, Contemplating Corporate Branding, Marketing and Communications in the Twenty-First Century, edited by. John M.T. Balmer, Laura Illia and Almudena Gonzalez Del Valle Brena, 55-71. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2013. Gilley, Bruce. “Legitimacy and Institutional Change.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 3 (2008): 47-71. Gilley, Bruce. “The Determinants of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries.” International Political Science Review 27, no. 1 (2006): 47-71. Guo, Baogang. China’s Quest for Political Legitimacy, The New Equity-Enhancing Politics. Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2010. Guo, Baogang. “Political Legitimacy in China’s Transition toward a Market Economy.” In China’s Deep Reform, Domestic Politics in Transition, edited by Lowell Dittmer and Guoli Liu, 147-176. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. Guo, Sujian and Baogang Guo, ed. China in Search of a Harmonious Society. Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2008. Hassid, Jonathan. “Controlling the Chinese Media, an Uncertain Business.” Asian Survey 48, no. 3 (2008): 414-430. Heberer, Thomas and Gunter Schuber, ed. Regime Legitimacy in Contemporary China, Institutional Change and Stability. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2009. Heberer, Thomas and Gunter Schubert. “Political Reform and Regime Legitimacy in Contemporary China.” ASIEN 99 (2006): 9-28. Hofstede, Geert. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001. Hofstede, Geert. “Cultural Dimensions in Management and Planning.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1, no. 2 (1984): 81-98. Holbig, Heike and Bruce Gilley. “Reclaiming Legitimacy in China.” Politics & Policy 38, no. 3 (2010): 395-422. Holbig, Heike. “Remaking the CCP’s Ideology: Determinants, Progress and Limits under Hu Jintao.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 38, no. 3 (2009): 35-61. Jansen, Harry. Triptiek van de Tijd: Geschiedenis in Drievoud. Nijmegen: Vantilt, 2010. Jesse, Eckhard. “Vergangenheitsbewältigung nach totalitärer Herrschaft in Deutschland. ” German Studies Review 17, no. 1 (1994): 157-171. Jiang, Qing. A Confucian Constitutional Order, How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. Jones, L. “Hofstede, Culturally Questionable?” Paper presented at the Oxford Business & Economic Conference, Oxford, June 24-26, 2007. Lai, Hongyi and Yiyi Lu. China’s Soft Power and International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2012. Li, Mingjiang. “China Debates Soft Power.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 2 (2008): 287-308. Liu, Jun. “Restless Chinese Nationalist Currents in the 1980s and the 1990s: A Comparative Reading of River Elegy and China Can Say No.” In Chinese Nationalism in Perspective: Historical and Recent Cases, edited by C. X. George Wei and Xiaoyuan Liu, 205-231. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2001. Kurlantzick, Joshua. Charm Offensive, How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World. Yale University Press, 2007. Makeham, John, ed. New Confucianism, a Critical Examination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Makeham, John. Lost Soul, Confucianism in Contemporary Chinese Academic Discourse. Harvard: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008. Mei, Yi Lee and Paul Ellis. “Insider-Outsider Perspectives of Guanxi.” Business Horizons 43, no. 1 (2000): 25-30. Meissner, Werner. “China’s Search for Cultural and National Identity from the Nineteenth Century to the Present.” China Perspectives 4, no. 68 (2006):1-17. Metzger, Thomas. A Cloud Across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash between Chinese and Western Political Theories Today. Hong Kong, The Chinese University Press, 2005. Moeller, Robert G. Protecting Motherhood, Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. Nathan, Andrew J. “China’s Changing of the Guard, Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14, no. 1 (2003): 6-17. North, Douglas C. “Economic Performance through Time.” American Economic Review 84, no. 3 (1994): 359-362. Pye, Lucian W. “China: Erratic State, Frustrated Society.” Foreign Affairs 69, no. 4 (1990): 26-74. Qu, Hong. “Religious Policy in the People’s Republic of China: An Alternative Perspective.” Journal of Contemporary China 20, no. 70 (2011): 24-41. Rainey, Lee Dian. Confucius & Confucianism, the Essentials. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Sebastien, Billioud. “Confucianism, Cultural Tradition and Official Discourses in China at the Start of the New Century.” China Perspectives 3 (2007): 50-65. Sewell Jr., William H. “The Concepts of Culture.” In Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, edited by Victoria E. Bonnel and Lynn Hunt, 35-37. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999. Shambaugh, David L. China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaption. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008. Smith, Huston. The World’s Religions. New York: HarperCollings, 1991. Tu, Wei-ming. “Cultural China: the Periphery as the Center.” Daedalus 120, no. 2 (1991): 1-28. Weatherly, Robert. Politics in China since 1949, Legitimizing Authoritarian Rule. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2007. Weber, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 1964. Wu, Shufang. “The Revival of Confucianism and the CCP’s Struggle for Cultural Leadership: A Content Analysis of the People’s Daily, 2000-2009.” Journal of Contemporary China (2014): 1-21. Wuthnow, Joel. “The Concept of Soft Power in China’s Strategic Discourse.” Issues & Studies 44, no. 2 (2008):1-28. Yanqi, Tong and Lei Shaohua. “Large-Scale Mass Incidents in China.” East Asian Policy 2 (2008): 23-33. Yu, Anthony C. State and Religion in China, Historical and Textual Perspectives. Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 2005. Zelditch, Morris. “Theories of Legitimacy.” In The psychology of Legitimacy, Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice and Intergroup Relations, edited by John T. Jost and Brenda Major, 33-53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Zhang, Tong and Barry Schwartz. “Confucius and the Cultural Revolution: A Study in Collective Memory.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 11, no. 2 (1997): 189-212. Zhu, Yuchao. “Performance Legitimacy and China’s Political Adaption Strategy.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 16, no. 2 (2011): 123-140.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 101926022 102
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1019260221
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
022101.pdf	1472Kb	Adobe PDF2	565	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈