English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110943/141871 (78%)
Visitors : 47565405      Online Users : 1204
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 歷史學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/71692


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71692


    Title: 從雷震案看戒嚴時期政治案件的法律處置對人權的侵害
    Other Titles: “Legal” Violation on Human Rights for Lei Chen Case During the Martial Law Period
    Authors: 蘇瑞鏘
    Su, Jui-Chiang
    Contributors: 歷史學系
    Keywords: 戒嚴時期;人權;人權侵害;白色恐怖;雷震
    Taiwan;Martial Law;Human Rights;White Terror;Lei Chen
    Date: 2006-12
    Issue Date: 2014-11-26 09:02:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 戰後臺灣戒嚴時期，國民黨政府曾製造過許多政治案件，以「叛亂」罪名處置過不少政治犯，對人權造成相當大的侵害。近年來，隨著民主政治的發展，不少有識之士陸續投入相關問題或個案的研究。然這些研究往往會呈現當局違法侵害人權的作為，卻未必會進一步分析當局實亦常披著「合法」的外衣來「依法」處置政治犯、從而侵害人權的作為。而細究當局這些「合法」的手段，即便是「合法律性」，卻多不具「正當性」，甚至常有曲解法律、玩弄法律之嫌，乃至有違憲之虞。本文特別選擇了1960年的雷震案作為實例，討論當局違法與「合法」的法律處置如何侵害人權（特別是人身自由與言論自由）的作為。而探討這段兼具高度學術價值與現實意義的人權侵害史，應有助於人權的保障與民主的鞏固。
    During the Martial Law Period in postwar Taiwan, the Kuomintang administration had punished many political offenders by charging them with rebellion. It caused a great violation on human rights. Recently with the development of democracy, some of elites are studying the relevant issues or cases. However, those researches usually manifest the authorities’ violating the human rights, but they neglect the fact that the authorities often punished the political criminals “according to the law” under the cover of “legalization”. To probe into the meaning of authorities’ “legal” carefully, we can find it did not have “legitimacy”, even distorting the law, and possibly violating the Constitution. This article selects Lei Chen case in 1960 as an example specially to discuss how the authorities’ illegal and “legal” disposal on law violating human rights (especially the personal liberty and the freedom of speech and expression). It has highly value to explore such history of violating human rights with a view of academy
    Relation: 國史館館刊, 15, 113-158
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[歷史學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    113-158.pdf2247KbAdobe PDF2863View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback