English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46020300      Online Users : 931
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73659


    Title: 區域的整合與衝突:京津冀城市區域的治理與矛盾
    Other Titles: Regional Integration and Conflict: The Governance and Contradiction of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei City-Region
    Authors: 楊勝群
    Yang, Sheng-Chun
    Contributors: 國發所
    Keywords: 京津冀;全球城市區域;國家空間戰略;空間分工
    Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei;Global city-regions;State spatial strategies;spatial division of labor
    Date: 2014-03
    Issue Date: 2015-03-04 16:15:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討京津冀城市區域的整合與衝突議題。隨著中國與全球經濟越來越高度連結,北京已逐漸轉型成吸引跨國公司總部聚集的全球城市,並與天津和河北逐漸形成功能分工的首都經濟圈。然而,自2006 年起,區域內另一大城市—天津,在中央主導的濱海新區成長極戰略的扶持下,不只屢屢與北京競爭金融特許政策,還磁吸河北的製造業。不過,本文發現,濱海新區的開發,雖促使天津經濟與工業快速發展,但北京的首要地位目前並未因此減弱。本文將指出,既有的經濟空間分工理論或政治權力決定論,都忽略了城市區域空間本身也同時是歷史的產物,因此無法有效解釋京津冀之間的競合關係,部分受到歷史空間因素的影響。因此,計畫經濟所遺留的歷史空間結構,使北京聚集了國家級部委、國有金融與企業總部,成為所有中外資本亟欲建立總部之地,而國家濱海空間戰略雖局部改變城市間的經濟空間分工關係,卻無法再度逆轉北京的歷史-制度空間結構,導致天津的城市功能只能被迫錯位發展,並與河北競爭工業發展。
    This paper discusses the issues of regional integration and conflict of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei city-region. With increasing links to global economy, Beijing has gradually been transformed into a global city, attracting multinational companies to establish headquarters, as well as promoted as a economic capital with functional divisions of labor and economic links. However, Tianjin, another major city in the region, has undergone rapid industrial development since 2006, especially from the central government`s “Tianjin Binhai New Area” spatial strategies stimulus. Under this strategic support, Tianjin has not only competes with Beijing for central government’s financial franchise polices, but also absorbs the manufacturing industries of Hebei and Beijing. However, we find that despite the rise in the Binhai New Area that prompted Tianjin’s economic and industrial development, the primary position of Beijing in this region has not been weakened. This article will point out that the arguments based on the spatial division of economic labor theory or political power determinism both ignore the fact that the cityregional spatial structures are also products of history, thus are not effective in explaining the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei competitive relationships. Therefore, the historical spatial structure of planned economy determines the gathering of national ministries, state-owned financial and corporate headquarters in Beijing. Although the state’s Binhai spatial strategy has partly changed the spatial division of economic relationships between cities, it cannot again reverse the historical-institutional spatial structure of Beijing. The results will be dislocated development of Tianjin city and forced competition with Hebei industrial developments.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究 , 57(1) ,1-31
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國家發展研究所] 期刊論文
    [中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-31.pdf1869KbAdobe PDF2675View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback