English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109077/140081 (78%)
Visitors : 43372962      Online Users : 741
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76172
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76172


    Title: 處置效果與過度自信之研究─以臺灣期貨市場為例
    A Study of Disposition Effect and Overconfidence in Taiwan Futures Markets
    Authors: 倪詩荏
    Ni, Shih Jen
    Contributors: 陳威光
    林靖庭

    Chen, Wei Kuang
    Lin, Ching Ting

    倪詩荏
    Ni, Shih Jen
    Keywords: 處置效果
    過度自信
    期貨市場
    金融海嘯
    disposition effect
    overconfidence
    futures markets
    financial crisis
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2015-07-01 14:45:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去的實證研究顯示交易人行為並非完全理性,因此,為了研究臺灣期貨市場投資人的交易行為,本篇論文利用期貨合約日內交易資料,探討臺灣期貨交易人的處置效果及過度自信之關係,並將期貨交易人身分類別分為國內法人、散戶、自營商及外資。
    此外,本文更深入探討投資人的交易行為是否受交易量及市場情況影響,因此進一步將資料做不同方向的分類。首先,將散戶依照交易量再分群,以探討不同交易量的散戶族群的交易行為是否不同,另外,我們也將資料區間分為金融海嘯前與金融海嘯期間,藉此觀察金融海嘯是否對交易行為有所影響。
    本篇論文研究結果顯示,(1)國內法人及散戶有較強烈的處置效果,而自營及外資則較弱。(2)依據投資績效結果顯示,自營商的交易量大,卻損失慘重,相較之下,明顯地具有過度自信。(3)交易量大的散戶會有較低的處置效果,但會較具過度自信。(4)機構投資人於金融海嘯期間會降低其處置效果及過度自信,而散戶則具有相反的表現。
    Previous literatures indicate that investors don’t exhibit rationally. To understand investors’ behaviors in Taiwan futures markets, we use intraday trading records from TAIFEX to examine the disposition effect and overconfidence across investor types. We focus on four investor types including domestic institutions, individuals, proprietaries and foreigners.
    To shed some light on trading behaviors of investors, we further discuss whether investors’ behaviors are influenced by trading volume or market conditions. We further separate the individuals by their trading volumes to analyze whether trading behaviors are different. Meanwhile, we also divide our sample period into two sub-periods─before and during financial crisis, to investigate the change of trading behaviors across investor types.
    The main contributions of this study are that (1) the retail investors, namely domestic institutions and individuals, exhibit more disposition effect on futures contracts. However, the professional institutions, including proprietaries and foreigners, display less disposition effect. (2) Proprietaries trade more, but they lose enormously. It appears that proprietaries demonstrate overconfidence. (3) Individual investors with higher trading volume have the lower disposition effect, but higher overconfidence. (4) Overall, institutions reduce disposition effect and overconfidence on most of contracts during financial crisis. In contrast, individual investors perform worse and display more overconfidence.
    Reference: Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. Journal of Finance, 55, 773-806.
    Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261-292.
    Barber, B. M., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., & Odean, T. (2009). Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 609-632.
    Dhar, R., & Zhu, N. (2006). Up close and personal: investor sophistication and the disposition effect. Management Science, 52, 726-740.
    Dorn, D., & Huberman, G. (2005). Talk and action: What individual investors say and what they do. Review of Finance, 9, 437-481.
    Feng, L., & Seasholes, M. (2005). Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Review of Finance, 9, 305-351.
    Glaser, M., & Weber, M. (2007). Overconfidence and trading volume. Geneva Risk and Insurance Revue, 32, 1-36.
    Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Huang, H. (2009). Investor competence, trading frequency, and home bias. Management Science, 55, 1094-1106.
    Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001a). What makes investors trade? Journal of Finance, 56, 589-616.
    Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2001b). How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance, 56, 1053-1073.
    Jhang, W. H. (2008). An examination of the relationship between trader`s profitability and disposition effect. National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology of Finance Management.
    Kahneman. D., & Tversky, A., (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, econometrica, 47, 263-292.
    Li, H. C., Lin, C. H., Cheng, T. Y., & Lai, S. (2013). How different types of traders behavior in the Taiwan futures market. Journal of Futures Markets, 33, 1097-1117.
    Moore, D., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502-517.
    Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.
    Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. Journal of Finance, 53, 1887-1934.
    Shapira, Z., & Venezia, I. (2001). Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 1573-1587.
    Shefrin, H., & Statman, M., (1985). Disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence, Journal of Finance, 40, 777-790.
    Wang, W. T. (2014). The disposition effect of individual investor during financial crisis - an empirical study of Taiwan. Asia University of Finance.
    Weber, M., & Camerer, C., (1998). The disposition effect in securities trading: an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33, 167-184.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    金融研究所
    102352012
    103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102352012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201201.pdf1022KbAdobe PDF2261View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback