政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/77314

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Department of English > Theses > Item 140.119/77314

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77314

Title:	差異化教學對國中生文法學習之效益 The Effects of Differentiated Instruction on English Grammar Learning of Junior High School Students
Authors:	李宜倫 Lee, Yi Lun
Contributors:	黃淑真 Huang, Shu Chen 李宜倫 Lee, Yi Lun
Keywords:	差異化教學文法教學彈性分組階梯式任務 differentiated instruction grammar teaching flexible grouping tiered task
Date:	2015
Issue Date:	2015-08-03 13:43:30 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討國中英文文法課堂中使用差異化教學之成效，主要的研究目標分別是：（一）差異化教學是否能提升學生的文法學習成效。（二）差異化教學在能提升低中高三組學生的文法學習成效上是否有差異。（三）學生對差異化教學的看法。本研究採準實驗研究法，教師以差異化教學策略中的階梯式任務和彈性分組法進行文法教學。在暖身階段，教師以全班式教學講授文法重點後，低中高成就學生分別接受不同的階梯式任務和彈性分組法進行練習；低成就學生須以小組形式完成文法選擇題練習，中成就組學生兩人一組完成文法填空題練習，高成就組學生獨立完成文法看圖造句練習。針對七年級學生進行11週差異化教學後，使用教師自編文法測驗前後測成績進行獨立樣本t檢定和共變數分析，並以焦點團體法瞭解低中高成就三組學生接受差異化教學之後的想法。研究結果顯示：（一）接受差異化教學的學生在前後測結果上有顯著性差異(p<.05)；（二）進一步針對低、中、高成就組學生進行分析，發現除了低分組在文法測驗選擇題中有顯著的學習進步之外，其他兩組與控制組無明顯差異。（三）高成就組學生對於差異化教學喜好度比中、低成就組學生低；（四）高成就組學生認為差異化教學材料對他們的幫助程度較低；（五）低成就組學生反應他們的學習困難為單字和造句；中成就組學生為單字、造句及口說；高成就組則為閱讀、口說、聽力及文法。低、中成就組學生皆認為差異化教學有助於他們克服學習困難。 This current study investigated the effects of integrating differentiated instruction into grammar teaching in junior high school English classes. The main purposes were to explore whether or not differentiated instruction improved the students` grammar achievements in general, whether students, when divided into, low, intermediate and high proficiency levels, respectively benefited from such instruction on grammar learning, and what students` experiences and thoughts were after receiving differentiated grammar instruction. The participants of this quasi-experimental study were 54 seven graders who received differentiated instruction for a total of eleven weeks. The researcher adopted two differentiated instructional strategies, tiered tasks and flexible grouping, to teach grammar. In the warm-up stage, the instructor taught grammar points in the whole class model. After the instruction, low, intermediate and high proficiency learners received different tiered tasks and flexible grouping respectively to do the grammar exercises. Low proficiency learners (LPL) were required to finish multiple choice exercises in small groups, intermediate proficiency learners (IPL) had to complete fill-in exercises in pairs and high proficiency learners (HPL) did the sentence making exercises with picture cues independently. Their performance on the pre- and posttest designed by the researcher was analyzed by independent t-test and ANCOVA. Their thoughts about experiencing DI were collected through focus group interviews. And the findings of the study were summarized as follows: 1. Students in the experimental group outperformed those in the control group significantly (p<.05). 2. When students in the experimental group were divided into three subgroups, only LPL improved their performance on the multiple choice section, and the other two groups showed no significant differences in comparison to their counterparts in the control group. 3. HPLs` preferences for DI were lower than those of LPL and IPL. The learning difficulties of LPL were vocabulary and sentence-making; of IPL were vocabulary, sentence-making, and speaking, and of HPL were reading, speaking, listening and grammar. Both LPL and IPL thought DI was beneficial for them to overcome the learning difficulties
Reference:	Adams, C. M., & Pierce, R. L. (2006). Differentiating Instruction: A Practical Guide to Tiered Lessons in the Elementary Grades: Prufrock Press. Alavinia, P., & Sadeghi, T. (2013). The Impact of Differentiated Task-Based Instruction via Heeding Learning Styles on EFL Learners` Feasible Proficiency Gains. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 19(1). Baecher, L., Artigliere, M., Patterson, D. K., & Spatzer, A. (2012). Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners as" Variations on a Theme". Middle School Journal, 43(3), 14-21. Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M. B., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing Reading Achievement of Primary and Middle School Students through Differentiated Instruction. Benjamin, A. (2014). Differentiated Instruction Using Technology: A Guide for Middle & HS Teachers: Taylor & Francis. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method: Prentice-Hall. Burns, J. P. (2005). An Analysis Of The Implementation Of Differentiated Instruction In A Middle School And High School And The Effects Of Implementation On Curriculum And Student Achievement. Chang, W.-C. (2006). English Language Education in Taiwan: A Comprehensive Survey. Education Resources and Research, 69, 129-144. Chapman, C., & King, R. (2007). Differentiated Instructional Management: Work Smarter, Not Harder: Corwin. Cheng, A.-C. (2006). Effects of differentiated curriculum and instruction on Taiwanese EFL students’ motivation, anxiety and interest. (Ed.D. 3238301), University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ddc_open_link_eng.htm?type=ddc&app=13&doi=3238301 Digital Dissertation Consortium database. Chien, C.-W. (2012). Differentiated Instruction in an Elementary School EFL Classroom. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 280-291. doi: 10.1002/tesj.18 Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Pearson College Division. Cummings, P. L. (2011). A Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Differentiated Instructional Strategies and Traditional Basal Instruction on the Reading Achiecement of Selected Fourth Grade Students. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48106-41346. Dahlman, A., Hoffman, P., & Brauhn, S. (2008). Classroom strategies and tools for differentiating instruction in the ESL classroom. MinneWITESOL Journal, 25, 58-77. Dangelo, F. D. (2006). Differentiated instruction: Effects on reading comprehension in the urban elementary school setting. (Ed.D. 3209259), Northcentral University. Retrieved from http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/ddc_open_link_eng.htm?type=ddc&app=13&doi=3209259 Digital Dissertation Consortium database. Danzi, J., Reul, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Improving Student Motivation in Mixed Ability Classrooms Using Differentiated Instruction. Online Submission. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research: SAGE Publications. Drapeau, P. (2004). Differentiated Instruction: Making It Work : A Practical Guide to Planning, Managing, and Implementing Differentiated Instruction to Meet the Needs of All Learners: Scholastic/Teaching Resources. Echevarría, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: the SIOP model: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Edmunds, H. (2000). The Focus Group Research Handbook: McGraw-Hill Education. Ellis, R. (2002). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 17-34). NJ: Routledge. Ford, M. P. (2005). Differentiation Through Flexible Grouping: Successfully Reaching All Readers. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Gower, R., & Walters, S. (1983). Teaching practice handbook: Heinemann London. Graham, K. J. (2009). Mandated differentiated instruction effectiveness examined. Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn`t Fit All: SAGE Publications. Gusman, J. (2004). Differentiated Instruction and the English Language Learner: Best Practices to Use With Your Students (K-12): National Professional Resources. Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Hartnell, B. J. (2011). Standards-based curriculum, differentiated instruction, and end of course assessments. (Ed.D. 3443953), Walden University Education. Retrieved from http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/ddc_open_link_eng.htm?type=ddc&app=13&doi=3443953 Digital Dissertation Consortium database. Harvey, P. (1985). A lesson to be learned: Chinese approaches to language learning. ELT Journal, 39, 183-186. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings: SUNY Press. Heacox, D. (2012). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners (Updated Anniversary Edition): Free Spirit Publishing. Heaton, J. B. (1990). Classroom testing: Longman. Hoover, J. J. P. J. R. (2004). Differentiating Standards-Based Education for Students with Diverse Needs. Remedial & Special Education, 25(2), 74-78. Hsieh, L.-H. (2011). Factors in Using Workbooks and/or Worksheets for English Classroom Assessment. [英語課堂評量中作業本與學習單的使用因素]. 課程與教學, 14(3), 199-238. Improving students` academic achievement through differentiated instruction, WALDEN UNIVERSITY (2010). Kang, C.-C. (2008). The Study on Differentiated Instructions of Regular Class Teachers in Taipei County. 國立台北教育大學. King, S. (2010). Factors associated with inclusive classroom teachers` implementation of differentiated instruction for diverse learners. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research: Sage. Lee, T.-k. (2007). Using case study to investigate Taiwanese ESL teachers’ beliefs about differentiated instruction. (Ph.D. 3285316), University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ddc_open_link_eng.htm?type=ddc&app=13&doi=3285316 Digital Dissertation Consortium database. Leedy, P. D. A., & Ormrod, J. E. A. (2001). Practical Research: Planning and Design: Merrill Prentice Hall. Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the Needs of All Students through Differentiated Instruction: Helping Every Child Reach and Exceed Standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 161-164. doi: 10.3200/TCHS.81.4.161-164 Li, C.-C. (2012). The Evolution and Vision of Taiwan’s English Education. Taiwan Eduction, 674, 31-40. McCullough, S. M. (2012). The Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Academic Achievement of Struggling Second Grade Readers. (Ed.D. 3489743), Walden University Education. Retrieved from http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ddc_open_link_eng.htm?type=ddc&app=13&doi=3489743 Digital Dissertation Consortium database. Mills, R. (1998). Grouping students for instruction in middle Schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education Champaign IL. Nassaji, H. (2000). Towards Integrating Form-Focused Instruction and Communicative Interaction in the Second Language Classroom: Some Pedagogical Possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 241-250. doi: 10.1111/0026-7902.00065 Parker, C. C. (2011). An Investigation of Differentiated Instruction: Closing the Achievement Gap for Elementary English Language Learners: ERIC. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice: Cambridge University Press. Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152-1162. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.003 Smutny, J. F., & Fremd, S. E. (2009). Differentiating for the Young Child: Teaching Strategies Across the Content Areas, PreK–3: SAGE Publications. Stuart, S., & Rinaldi, C. (2009). A Collaborative Planning Framework for Teachers Implementing Tiered Instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(2), 52-57. Tomlinson, C. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-ability Classrooms: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Tomlinson, C., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for Differentiating Schools and Classrooms: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Tomlinson, C., & Eidson, C. (2003). Differentiation in Practice: A Resource Guide for Differentiating Curriculum, Grades 5-9: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Tseng, S.-s. (2008). Academic Adjustment of Junior High School EFL Students in Taiwan. 國立屏東教育大學. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Wu, C. M. (2003). A Study of the Comparative Effect of Input-based Grammar Instruction and Output-based Instruction on the Acquisition of the English Subjunctive Mood. (碩士(Master)), National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan. Retrieved from http://etds.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs/ntnugsweb.cgi?o=dntnucdr&i=sid=%22N2003000367%22. Wu, M. Q. (2004). English teaching problems in the primary school. 台灣教育(629), 45-48. Yang, C.-H. (2013). The Effects of Inductive and Deductive Grammar Instruction: A Comparative Analysis. (碩士), 國立東華大學, 花蓮縣. 張武昌. (2006). 台灣的英語教育: 現況與省思 (Vol. 69, pp. 129-144): 教育資料與研究雙月刊.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班 100951015
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100951015
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
101501.pdf	1877Kb	Adobe PDF2	131	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...