English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48378349      Online Users : 951
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/77528
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77528


    Title: 社群網站之多重帳號使用戰術與人際關係研究-以上班族為例
    Multiple Accounts Tactics and Interpersonal Relationships on Social Network Sites: Take Employee as Example
    Authors: 吳皓筠
    Contributors: 吳筱玫
    吳皓筠
    Keywords: Facebook
    de Certeau
    社群網站
    人際關係
    人際權力
    形象整飾
    Facebook
    de Certeau
    social network sites
    interpersonal relationship
    interpersonal power
    image management
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-08-17 14:03:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   社群網站集結了線下各種社會關係於平台中的特色,幫助使用者重整自我人際關係。社群網站中的各種功能得以應對不同社交情況,然而,根據東方線上的調查報告指出,以多重帳號分流管理人際關係的現象愈加普遍,社群媒體打破了虛實人脈的界線,在隱私權與形象管理等需求下,衍生出「雲端多重人格症」,出現多帳號、人際分流的狀態。
      尤其當人們踏入職場後,將比起學生族群面臨更為多樣的社會交際互動。因此,本研究以擁有多個Facebook帳號的上班族為對象,探究他們在使用多重Facebook帳號時所採取的戰術策略、所面臨的人際關係與權力影響,以及在不同帳號中所呈現的自我形象。
      本研究透過深度訪談法蒐集了八位在Facebook中經營多重帳號之上班族的使用經驗,發現上班族使用者們以創建多個Facebook帳號,作為閃躲Facebook意圖讓使用者間更加緊密連結的主要手段,藉由「與現實生活中可連結之假名」、「不完整的個人資料編輯」、「帳號間的互相封鎖或追蹤」等戰術,來對抗Facebook希望達到的人際關係串聯。另一方面,這種策略運用可被視為對de Certeau所提出之「戰略」與「戰術」的顛覆,Facebook使用者不僅運用戰術躲避網站空間的戰略,亦用以閃躲其他戰術使用者,形成另一種「戰略」與「戰術」的共舞狀態。此外,Facebook多重帳號的上班族使用者藉著「戰術」使用,不僅翻轉了原先de Certeau對「戰略」與「戰術」之二元觀點,更推翻費孝通早期所提出的人際親疏遠近模型。社群網路中的人際關係與權力影響充滿不確定性,親疏遠近的定義隨著不同使用者而改變,透過將不同層面之好友加入不同帳號的過程,上班族使用者能夠更彈性地控制這些關係中親疏遠近的變更,並在Facebook人際互動的過程中獲得更多自主權。同時,多重帳號的使用模式將傳統虛擬社群中人們得以自由探索自我之特性帶入與現實生活緊密相連的社群網站中,藉由在不同親疏關係的帳號中有不同程度的展演,上班族使用者得以同時在前/後台中現身,一邊整飾自我形象,一邊解放真實自我。
    Given the function of representing offline social relations, social media platforms, such as Facebook, facilitate users to maintain their online relationships based on different social conditions. According to a report of Eastern Online, some users, for the reasons of privacy and image control, manage their interpersonal relationship with multiple accounts, resulting in the online phenomenon of ‘multiple accounts, multiple relations’.
    This is especially true when students graduate from schools and start to work. Once becoming job employees, they have to encounter their bosses, colleagues, and other phatic relations, enhancing their desire for manipulating multiple accounts. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine Facebook users who have created multiple accounts for social groupings, to explore their tactics against the potential power subjects such as their parents, their bosses, or Facebook itself, and to discover how they formulate their images in different accounts.
    Eight employee subjects with multiple Facebook accounts were recruited for in-depth interviews. The study found that, although the Facebook policy encourages world-wide users tightly interconnected, users tend to escape from this strategy by using pseudonym, partial and falsified personal data, and block and trace tactics among Facebook friends. On the other hand, users not only use tactics against the strategy made by Facebook, but also against other tactic users such as their parents or elders who are relatively powerless in using Facebook and would like to tactically detect their children’s actions all the times. Such findings have challenged de Certeau’s theory of everyday life practice, since the binary distinction of strategy and tactic is no more warranted.
    The study also found the uncertainty of interpersonal relationship in Facebook. Thanks to Facebook design, users are allowed to join different friends into different accounts. In other words, they can define who are ‘close friends’ and who are ‘not so close’ online. And this definition may change from time to time. Such self-control provides users with flexibility to rewrite the closeness of their Facebook ‘friends’ in different life periods. Consequently, they rewrite the stable nature of Fei Hsiao-Tung’s sense of ‘relationship’, in which closeness and strangeness would not change easily over time. Finally, with the use of multiple accounts, the study found both front-stage and back-stage selves in Facebook, making image management more complex and increasing the possibility of liberating the true selves.
    Reference: 方琳琳、黃春柳譯(2009)。《日常生活實踐1. 實踐的藝術》。南京:南京大學。(原書 Michel de Certeau [1990]. L’ Invention du quotidian - 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.)
    王右君(2009)。〈重訪網路上的身分展演:以同志論壇MOTSS為分析對象〉,《新聞學研究》,99:47-77。
    吉佳媛、陳柏佑(2008年7月)。〈虛擬社群網站之「實名制」與網際認同塑造之研究-以南韓Cyworld網站為例〉,「中華傳播學會2008年年會」,台北縣淡水。
    朱道凱譯(1998)。《網路商機:如何經營虛擬社群?》,台北:臉譜。(原書 Hagel, J. III, & Armstrong, A. G. [1997]. Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.)
    江嘉軒(2004)。《虛擬社群網站使用動機與社會臨場感研究》。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳智鴻、蔡依錞(2014)。〈以科技接受模式來探討社群網站 Facebook 的使用意圖〉,《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》,10(1):29-44。
    李令儀、羅慧雯、許家馨譯(1998)。《版本2.0》。台北:大塊文化。(原書 Esther Dyson [1997]. Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age. New York: Broadway Books.)
    李美華譯(2004)。《社會科學研究方法》。臺北:時英。(原書 Barbie, Earl. [2001]. The Practice Of Social Research. Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth Thomson Learning.)
    谷玲玲(2013)。〈網路親密關係中的自我揭露〉,《資訊社會研究》,24: 1-26。
    周尚曄、李岳庭(2012)。〈社會新鮮人學生時期友誼的維持與轉變探討〉,《台灣心理諮商季刊》,4(4):37-54。
    周群英譯(2009)。《分析日常生活與文化理論》。台北:韋伯文化。(原書 Highmore, B. [2002]. Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.)
    林怡秀、李怡青(2011)。〈非語言敏感度:權力差異與不同社會角色期待的效果探討〉,《教育與心理研究》,34(1):55-77。
    林惠琴(2013年7月16日)。〈「鍵人」出現多重人格 FB名單人際「虛胖」〉,《卡優新聞網》。取自http://www.cardu.com.tw/news/detail.php?nt_pk=7&ns_pk=19883
    凃保民(2010)。《從關係網絡觀點探討社會網絡網站使用之研究─以大學生使用Facebook為例》。臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所博士論文。
    洪懿妍(2014年10月)。〈沒下線就不下班?左右升遷的5個社群新規則〉,《Cheers雜誌》。取自http://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5061699
    范麗娟(2004)。〈深度訪談〉,謝臥龍(編),《質性研究》,頁81-125。台北:心理。
    凌筠婷(2011)。《上班族的另一張[臉]─解讀臺灣上班族使用Facebook (臉書)之心理狀態》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    徐江敏、李姚軍譯(1992)。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北:桂冠。(原書 Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.)
    張君玫譯(2001)。《文化消費與日常生活》。台北:巨流。(原書 Storey, J. [1974]. Culture Consumption and Everyday Life. London: Fontana.)
    張純富(2010)。《社交網站人際關係維繫之研究:以Facebook為例》。世新大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。
    許慈雅(2011)。《社交網站與組織內人際關係改變之關聯性研究─以Facebook為例。》國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    陳玉軒(2005)。《組織中人際信任的形成之探索性研究》。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    陳李綢(2005)。《個案研究理論與實務》。臺北市:心理。
    陳姿蓓(2010)。《請看我表演!探討網路社交平台的自我展演》。國立台灣藝術大學應用媒體研究所碩士論文。
    陳蔚承(2013)。《實名制、網路社會運動與網路人際關係之初探:以Facebook個人網頁討論士林王家「文林苑」都更案為例》。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。
    創市際市場研究顧問(2013年10月31日)。台灣2013年9月網路流量報告。台北:創市際市場研究顧問。取自:http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_10_31_13.html
    創市際市場研究顧問(2014年3月3日)。2013年台灣網路使用概況回顧。創市際雙週刊,12,取自http://news.ixresearch.com/?p=7482。
    費孝通(1948)。《鄉土中國》。香港:三聯。
    黃光國(1985)。《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北:巨流。
    黃宗賢(2013)。〈國中生 Facebook 使用情形之初探研究〉,《教育研究論壇》,4(2):23-41。
    黃厚銘(2000)。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉,《臺大社會學刊》,28: 118-149。
    黃洛晴(2004)。《網際空間中虛擬社群的自我組構―以網路小說社群為例》。東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    黃若瑜(2014年7月16日)。〈政策軟化!Google+向用戶道歉並取消實名制〉,《數位時代》。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/33050
    萬毓澤(2007)。〈從日常戰術到「新革命主體」:論de Certeau、Holloway與Negri筆下的權力與抵抗〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,20:57-131。
    資策會產業情報研究所(2014年6月13日)。96.2%台灣網友近期曾使用社交網站。取自http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence/pressroom/pop_pressFull.asp?sno=364&cred=2014/6/13
    蔣昕(2010)。《臉書上的一張臉譜:社交網站上的劃界與展演》。清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
    盧家怡(2011)。《社群網站使用動機與廣告記憶效果之研究-以台灣區Facebook使用者為例》。中興大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文。
    盧嵐蘭(2005)。《媒介消費:閱聽人與社會》。台北:揚智文化。
    謝欣倩(1998)。〈城市中的流浪者:關於宣傳車的批判民族誌研究〉,「中華傳播學會1998年年會」論文,台北縣深坑。
    謝靜雯(2013)。《從媒體中介到社群中介─名人和粉絲透過社群網站的觀展和想像》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    羅紓筠(2008)。《手機、青少女與日常生活:手機使用對外在結構的抗衡》。政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。
    譚天、吳家珍譯(1998)。《虛擬化身─網路世代的身分認同》,台北:違流。(原書Sherry Turkle [1995]. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone. )。
    蘇妍云(2014年1月2日)。〈社群網站評比 你今天social了嗎〉,《電子商務時報》。取自http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=140101234528
    Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford.
    boyd, D. (2006, December). Friends, friendsters, and mySpace Top 8: writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11 (12).
    boyd, D. (2008). None of this is real. In Joe Karaganis (Eds.), Structures of Participation in Digital Culture (pp. 132-157). New York: Social Science Research Council.
    boyd, D. (2011, June). Networked Privacy. New York, NY.
    boyd, D. M. & Nicole B. E. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship [Electronic version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.
    Bruckman, A. (1993). Gender swapping on the Internet? Proceedings of the Internet society(Proc. INET’93). Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/papers/conference/gender-swapping.txt
    Corinne W. (NOVEMBER 16, 2011). Negotiating multiple identities on the social web: Goffman, fragmentation and the multiverse. Retrieved From http://sites.stedwards.edu/socialmedia/2011/11/16/negotiating-multiple-identities-on-the-social-web-goffman-fragmentation-and-the-multiverse/
    DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2007, November). Identity management: multiple presentations of self in facebook. Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, 383-386.
    Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231-251.
    Ellison, N. B. (2013). What is, and will be, the impact of social media on identity? Report commissioned by the UK Government Office for Science for a Foresight project on The Future of Identity.
    Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
    Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.
    Farnham, S. D., & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 359-368.
    Gozzi, Jr., R. (2010). My life is a drama on Facebook. ETC: A Review of General Semantics,67(2), 234-235.
    Gross, B. M., & Churchill, E. F. (2007). Addressing constraints: multiple usernames task spillage and notions of identity. Proceedings of Computer/Human Interaction 2007 Conference, 2393-2398.
    Hampton, K.N., L.S. Goulet, L. Rainie, and K. Purcell. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research: Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx.
    Donath, J. & boyd, D. (2004, October). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
    Kim, K. H., & Yun, H. (2007). Cying for me, cying for us: Relational dialectics in a korean social network site. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 298-318.
    Kolko, B. E. (1999). Representing bodies in virtual space: The rhetoric of avatar design. The Information Society, 15(3), 177-186.
    Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., & Steinfield, C. (2006, November). A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 167-170.
    Changizi, M. (2010/2/22). Multiple personality social media. Retrieved fromhttp://www.science20.com/mark_changizi/multiple_personality_social_media
    Marwick, A. (2005, October). “I’m a lot more interesting than a Friendster profile:” Identity presentation, authenticity, and power in social networking services. Paper presented at Internet Research 6.0, Chicago, IL.
    Marwick, A. E., boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13(1), 114-133.
    Casserly, M. (2011, January 26). Multiple personalities and social media: The many faces of me. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2011/01/26/multiple-personalities-and-social-media-the-many-faces-of-me/
    O’Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403–431.
    Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2010). The relationship between traditional mass media and “social media”: Reality television as a model for social network site behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(3), 508-525.
    Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal power a review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 136-163.
    Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420-433.
    Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2012). The confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research. doi:10.1177/0093650212466257. Retrieved from http://crx.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/18/0093650212466257.full.pdf+html
    Vitak, J., Lampe, C., Gray, R. & Ellison, N. (2012). "Why won`t you be my Facebook friend?": strategies for managing context collapse in the workplace. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 iConference. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~enicole/VitakLampeGrayEllison_iConf2012.pdf
    Wood, J. T. (2010). Interpersonal communication everyday encounters. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
    Yin K. R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    101451015
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101451015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101501.pdf1836KbAdobe PDF2847View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback