English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46089995      Online Users : 1362
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/79445


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79445


    Title: 康德的「責任的作者」概念
    Other Titles: Kant`s Concept of ＂Author of Obligation＂
    Authors: 劉若韶
    Lau, Edward Yeuk-Siu
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 道德責任;道德立法者;道德自律;上帝誡命理論
    moral obligation;moral legislator;moral autonomy;divine command theory
    Date: 2015-01
    Issue Date: 2015-12-01 14:56:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: John Hare認為，雖然康德否認道德義務的內涵出於上帝的誡命，但是他卻相信上帝的誡命是道德義務的權威的來源。Hare因此主張，康德其實是一位上帝誡命論者。本文引述康德對自然責任與制定責任的區分，指出道德法則的強制能力是自然責任，沒有任何作者；所謂「上帝是依據道德法則的責任的作者」，其實是指祂是以道德義務作為內涵的上帝的誡命的制定責任的作者，又或者說，是道德法則的自然責任的轉化者或強化者。由於上帝並不是道德法則本身具有的自然責任的作者，上帝的誡命並不是道德義務的權威的來源。因此，Hare的論點並不成立。
    John Hare has argued that Kant does not reject the divine command theory in general because he himself accepts a form of the theory. While Kant denies that divine commands are the source of the content of duties, he believes that duties depend on divine commands for their authority, so says Hare. This articles attempts to clarify Kant`s conception of moral legislator as author of obligation. By referring to Kant`s distinction between natural and positive obligations, I argue that the moral law is a natural law and its obligation has no author. While Kant calls God author of the obligation in accordance with the moral law, he means that God is the author of the positive obligation of divine commands, or alternatively speaking, God is the enhancer of the obligation of the moral law by transforming it from a natural obligation into a positive one. As God is not the author of the obligation of the moral law as such, moral duties do not depend on divine commands for their authority. I, therefore, conclude that Hare`s thesis is not plausible.
    Relation: 鵝湖學誌, 54, 83-116
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    83116.pdf1384KbAdobe PDF2587View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback